Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018; 66(08): 686-692
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1608899
Original Thoracic
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Clinical Outcome of Urgent Thoracotomy in Patients with Penetrating and Blunt Chest Trauma: A Retrospective Survey

Yael Refaely*
1   Department of CardioThoracic Surgery, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
,
Leonid Koyfman*
2   Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, General Intensive Care Unit, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
,
Michael Friger
3   Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
,
Leonid Ruderman
1   Department of CardioThoracic Surgery, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
2   Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, General Intensive Care Unit, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
,
Mahmud Abu Saleh
1   Department of CardioThoracic Surgery, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
,
Gidon Sahar
1   Department of CardioThoracic Surgery, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
,
Gad Shaked
4   Department of Surgery, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
,
Moti Klein
2   Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, General Intensive Care Unit, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
,
Evgeni Brotfain
2   Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, General Intensive Care Unit, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

11. Juli 2017

18. Oktober 2017

Publikationsdatum:
12. Dezember 2017 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Introduction In contrast to an emergency department of thoracotomy (EDT), an urgent thoracotomy (UT) is defined as a surgical thoracic intervention performed in the operating room within the first 48 hours of the patient's intensive care unit (ICU) stay. The factors affecting survival after UT are not fully understood. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical data and outcome of patients with blunt and penetrating chest injuries who underwent UT.

Methods All adult patients who had blunt or penetrating chest trauma and who underwent UT, were included in the study. All data were collected from the patients' hospital and ICU records. Forty-five patients with thoracic injuries who underwent UT during the first 48 hours of ICU stay were analyzed. Of these, 25 had penetrating chest injuries, and 20 had blunt thoracic injuries. Of the penetrating injuries, 16 were stab wounds, and 9 were gunshot wounds.

Results Overall ICU mortality was 29% (n = 13) and was significantly higher in the blunt chest trauma group than in the penetrating trauma group (45% vs 16%; p = 0.04). Lung parenchyma injuries (lacerations and contusions) were the most common intraoperative findings in both groups. The following independent predictors of in-hospital mortality were found: an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of >40; an Acute Physiology and Chronic Evaluation II (APACHE II) score of >30; prolonged duration of UT; low body temperature on admission to the ED; abnormal arterial blood lactate, bicarbonate, and pH at the end of UT; and use of vasopressors during the first 24 hours of ICU stay.

Conclusion Mortality after UT was higher in patients with blunt chest trauma. The UT should be performed in both penetrating and blunt chest trauma as quickly as possible and should be limited to damage control. It also emerges that acidosis and hypothermia in chest trauma patients need to be treated extremely aggressively before, during, and after UT.

Ethics

The Human Research and Ethics Committee at Soroka Medical Center in Beer-Sheva, Israel, approved this study (RN-0124–15-SOR).


Authors' Contributions

Dr. Yael Refaely participated in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, and writing. Dr. Leonid Koyfman participated in the literature search, study design, data collection, data analysis, and data interpretation. Prof. Michael Friger participated in data collection and performed the statistical analysis and data interpretation. Dr. Leonid Ruderman participated in the design of the study, performed the statistical analysis, and helped in revising the manuscript. Dr. Mahmud Abu Saleh participated in the design of the study, performed the statistical analysis, and helped in revising the manuscript. Dr. Gidon Sahar participated in the design of the study, performed the statistical analysis, and helped in revising the manuscript. Dr. Gad Shaked participated in the design of the study, performed the statistical analysis, and helped in revising the manuscript. Dr. Moti Klein conceived the study, participated in its design and coordination, and helped to draft the manuscript. Dr. Evgeni Brotfain participated in the design of the study and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript.


All authors read and approved the manuscript. It is important to clarify that all authors listed agreed that both Dr. Refaely and Dr. Koyfman contributed equal work regarding the paper. They both participated in design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, and writing of the paper.


* Both authors contributed equally to this work.