Dynamic Kinetic Resolution of Phosphinic Acid Derivatives via Nucleophilic­ Substitution at Phosphorus Center

Dorota Strzelecka; Olga Bąk; Piotr Borowski; Marek Stankevič

doi:10.1055/s-0037-1609947

Synthesis, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Synthesis 2018; 50(24): 4922-4932
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1609947

paper

Dynamic Kinetic Resolution of Phosphinic Acid Derivatives via Nucleophilic Substitution at Phosphorus Center

Dorota Strzelecka

^aDepartment of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Marie Curie-Sklodowska University in Lublin, 33 Gliniana St., 20-614 Lublin, Poland eMail: marek.stankevic@poczta.umcs.lublin.pl

,

Olga Bąk

^bDepartment of Chromatographic Methods, Faculty of Chemistry, Marie Curie-Sklodowska University in Lublin, 3 Marie Curie-Sklodowska Sq., 20-031 Lublin, Poland eMail: piotr.borowski@poczta.umcs.lublin.pl

,

Piotr Borowski*

^bDepartment of Chromatographic Methods, Faculty of Chemistry, Marie Curie-Sklodowska University in Lublin, 3 Marie Curie-Sklodowska Sq., 20-031 Lublin, Poland eMail: piotr.borowski@poczta.umcs.lublin.pl

,

Marek Stankevič *

^aDepartment of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Marie Curie-Sklodowska University in Lublin, 33 Gliniana St., 20-614 Lublin, Poland eMail: marek.stankevic@poczta.umcs.lublin.pl

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Alle Artikel dieser Rubrik

Abstract

Reaction of racemic phosphinic acid derivatives with chiral alcohols proceeds with predominant formation of one diastereomer. The highest level of enrichment has been obtained for transesterfication of racemic methyl benzylphenylphosphinate (64% de). The outcome of the reaction depends on both the structure of chiral alcohol and the starting organophosphorus compound. The results strongly suggest that the nature of the observed phenomena is not a classical equilibration of intermediates found in dynamic kinetic resolution process but is a result of a different reactivity of both enantiomers of racemic substrate towards the same chiral nucleophile.

Key words

phosphinic acid derivatives - transesterification - dynamic kinetic resolution - Berry pseudorotation - stereochemistry

Volltext

Referenzen

References

1a Grabulosa A. P-Stereogenic Ligands in Enantioselective Catalysis: RSC Publishing: Cambridge. 2011
1b Phosphorus Ligands in Asymmetric Catalysis. Synthesis and Applications. Börner A. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2008

2 Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis. Ojima I. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2000. 2nd ed. Chap. 1-3
3 Knowles WS. Sabacky MJ. Vineyard BD. Weinkauff DJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975; 97: 2567

4a Lipkowitz KB. D’Hue CA. Sakamoto T. Stack JN. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002; 124: 14255
4b Crepy KV. L. Imamoto T. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2003; 345: 79

5a Jugé S. Stephan M. Laffitte JA. Genêt JP. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990; 31: 6357
5b Carey JV. Barker MD. Brown JM. Russell MJ. H. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1993; 831
5c Maienza F. Spindler F. Thommen M. Pugin B. Malan C. Mezzetti A. J. Org. Chem. 2002; 67: 5239
5d Colby EA. Jamison TF. J. Org. Chem. 2003; 68: 156
5e Grabulosa A. Muller G. Ordinas JI. Mezzetti A. Maestro MA. Font-Bardia M. Solans X. Organometallics 2005; 24: 4961

6a Muci AR. Campos KR. Evans DA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995; 117: 9075
6b Wolfe B. Livinghouse T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998; 120: 5116
6c Imamoto T. Watanabe J. Wada Y. Masuda H. Yamada H. Tsuruta H. Matsukawa S. Yamaguchi K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998; 120: 1635
6d Tsuruta H. Imamoto T. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1999; 10: 877
6e Ohashi A. Imamoto T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001; 42: 1099

7a Pellissier H. Tetrahedron 2018; 74: 3459
7b Liu B. Yan J. Huang R. Wang W. Jin Z. Zanoni G. Zheng P. Yang S. Chi YR. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 3447
7c Paladhi S. Hwang I.-S. Yoo EJ. Ryu DH. Song CE. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 2003
7d Guasch J. Giménez-Nueno I. Funes-Ardoiz I. Bernús M. Matheu MI. Maseras F. Castillón S. Díaz Y. Chem. Eur. J. 2018; 24: 4635

8a Huang X. Oh WR. J. J. Zhou JS. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018; 57: 7673
8b Ironmonger A. Shipton M. Slater F. Szeto P. Unthank MG. Alexandre F.-R. Caillet C. Dousson CB. Tetrahedron Lett. 2018; 59: 2154
8c Keßberg A. Lübken T. Metz P. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 3006
8d Song B. Chen M.-W. Zhou Y.-G. Org. Chem. Front. 2018; 5: 1113

9 Wittig G. Cristau HJ. Braun H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1967; 6: 700

10a Kiełbasiński P. Omelańczuk J. Mikołajczyk M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1998; 9: 283
10b Kwiatkowska M. Krasiński G. Cypryk M. Cierpiał T. Kiełbasiński P. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2011; 22: 1581
10c Mikołajczyk M. Łuczak J. Kiełbasiński P. Colonna S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2009; 20: 1948

11 Deerenberg S. Schrekker HS. van Strijdonck GP. F. Kamer PC. J. van Leeuwen PW. N. M. Fraanje J. Goubitz K. J. Org. Chem. 2000; 65: 4810

12a Bergin E. O’Connor CT. Robinson SB. McGarrigle EM. O’Mahony CP. Gilheany DG. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007; 129: 9566
12b Nikitin K. Rajendran KV. Müller-Bunz H. Gilheany DG. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 1906
12c Rajendran KV. Gilheany DG. Chem. Commun. 2012; 48: 10040

13a Liu L.-J. Wang W.-M. Yao L. Meng F.-J. Sun Y.-M. Xu H. Xu Z.-Y. Li Q. Zhao C.-Q. Han L.-B. J. Org. Chem. 2017; 82: 11990
13b Krasowska D. Chrzanowski J. Kiełbasiński P. Drabowicz J. Molecules 2016; 21: 1573

14a Bürgi H.-B. Shklover V. In Reaction Paths for Nucleophilic Substitution (S_N2) Reactions. In Structure Correlation. Vol. 1. Bürgi H.-B. Dunitz JD. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2008
14b Jennings EV. Nikitin K. Ortin Y. Gilheany DG. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014; 136: 16217
14c Kolodiazhnyi OI. Kolodiazhna A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2017; 28: 1651

15a Oswald AA. Can. J. Chem. 1959; 37: 1498
15b Froneman M. Modro TA. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988; 27: 3327

16a Bálint E. Tajti A. Drahos L. Ilia G. Keglevich G. Curr. Org. Chem. 2013; 17: 555
16b Bálint E. Tajti A. Tóth N. Keglevich G. Molecules 2018; 23: 1618

17a Harger MJ. P. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1977; 1882
17b Benamer M. Turcaud S. Royer J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010; 51: 645

18a Korpiun O. Lewis RA. Chickos J. Mislow K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968; 98: 4842
18b Oshiki T. Imamoto T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1990; 63: 3719
18c Reichl KD. Ess DH. Radosevich AT. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013; 135: 9354

19a Orgué S. Flores-Gaspar A. Biosca M. Pàmies O. Diéguez M. Riera A. Verdaguer X. Chem. Commun. 2015; 51: 17548
19b Salomo E. Prades A. Riera A. Verdaguer X. J. Org. Chem. 2017; 82: 7065

20 Bąk, O.; Borowski, P.; Stankevič, M. manuscript in preparation.
21 Berger O. Montchamp JL. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 11377
22 Dams I. Białońska A. Ciunik Z. Wawrzeńczyk C. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004; 2662
23 Gream GE. Wege D. Mular M. Aust. J. Chem. 1974; 27: 567
24 Souto JA. Stockman RA. Ley SV. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015; 13: 3871
25 Cremonesi G. Dalla CP. Forni A. La Rosa C. Tetrahedron 2013; 69: 1175
26 Huston RC. Bostwick CO. J. Org. Chem. 1948; 13: 331
27 Little CB. Schuster GB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984; 106: 7167
28 Petit C. Favre-Reguillon A. Mignani G. Lemaire M. Green Chem. 2010; 12: 326
29 Rajendran KV. Gilheany DG. Chem. Commun. 2012; 48: 817
30 Harger MJ. P. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1980; 1505
31 Yoshino T. Togo H. Synlett 2005; 517
32 Stankevič M. Siek M. Pietrusiewicz KM. ARKIVOC 2011; (v): 102
33 Becke AD. J. Chem. Phys. 1993; 98: 5648
34 Krishnan R. Binkley JS. Seeger R. Pople JA. J. Chem. Phys. 1980; 72: 650
35 Frisch MJ. Pople JA. Binkley JS. J. Chem. Phys. 1984; 80: 3265
36 Baker J. Wolinski K. Malagoli M. Kinghorn D. Wolinski P. Magyarfalvi G. Saebo S. Janowski T. Pulay P. J. Comput. Chem. 2009; 30: 317
37 Makowiec S. Rachoń J. Phosphorus, Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 2002; 177: 941
38 Rodriguez VY. del Aguila MA. Iglesias MJ. Lopez Ortiz F. Tetrahedron 2012; 68: 7355
39 Uziel J. Darcel C. Moulin D. Bauduin C. Juge S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2001; 12: 1441
40 Yoshino T. Imori S. Togo H. Tetrahedron 2006; 62: 1309
41 Sheldrick WS. Haegele G. Kueckelhaus W. J. Mol. Struct. 1981; 74: 331
42 Zhou Y. Wang G. Saga Y. Shen R. Goto M. Zhao Y. Han LB. J. Org. Chem. 2010; 75: 7924

Zusatzmaterial

Supporting Information

Dynamic Kinetic Resolution of Phosphinic Acid Derivatives via Nucleophilic­ Substitution at Phosphorus Center

Dynamic Kinetic Resolution of Phosphinic Acid Derivatives via Nucleophilic Substitution at Phosphorus Center