RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1612627
Inhibitors in Hemophilia A: A Pharmacoeconomic Perspective
Publikationsverlauf
Publikationsdatum:
08. Dezember 2017 (online)
Abstract
A discussion of the main pharmacoeconomic issues related to inhibitors in hemophilia A cannot be separated from an analysis of the most relevant clinical questions. In the field of inhibitors, the clinical evidence includes several controversial topics, such as high-titer versus low-titer inhibitors, the influence of factor VIII products on inhibitor risk, effectiveness of different immune tolerance induction (ITI) treatments, the role of bypassing agents, and development of new non-factor-VIII compounds. In terms of pharmacoeconomic data, numerous cost estimates have been reported in these fields, but this information is strongly influenced by the wide between-country differences in unit costs. Quite reliable data are, however, available regarding expenditure for replacement therapy in patients without inhibitors, increased lifetime costs caused by high-titer inhibitors, and cost of pharmacological interventions aimed at eradicating inhibitors. As regards the cost-effectiveness ratio, the data on ITI are not conclusive; nonetheless, irrespective of the specific treatments employed for inducing tolerance, their costs seem to be offset by the subsequent savings in the cost per patient. Other issues, such as the cost of low-titer inhibitors in patients with hemophilia A and effectiveness of pharmacological interventions aimed at eradicating low-titer inhibitors are not supported by sound data and will require further research. Finally, although the efficacy and safety profiles of novel treatments (e.g., emicizumab, Roche) warrant long-term clinical studies, the economic advantages of these new compounds might be very substantial both in patients with inhibitors and in those at risk of developing inhibitors.
-
References
- 1 Valente M, Cortesi PA, Lassandro G. , et al. Health economic models in hemophilia A and utility assumptions from a clinician's perspective. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2015; 62 (10) 1826-1831
- 2 Earnshaw SR, Graham CN, McDade CL, Spears JB, Kessler CM. Factor VIII alloantibody inhibitors: cost analysis of immune tolerance induction vs. prophylaxis and on-demand with bypass treatment. Haemophilia 2015; 21 (03) 310-319
- 3 Farrugia A, Cassar J, Kimber MC. , et al. Treatment for life for severe haemophilia A- A cost-utility model for prophylaxis vs. on-demand treatment. Haemophilia 2013; 19 (04) e228-e238
- 4 Rasekh HR, Imani A, Karimi M, Golestani M. Cost-utility analysis of immune tolerance induction therapy versus on-demand treatment with recombinant factor VII for hemophilia A with high titer inhibitors in Iran. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res 2011; 3: 207-212
- 5 Escobar MA. Health economics in haemophilia: a review from the clinician's perspective. Haemophilia 2010; 16 (Suppl. 03) 29-34
- 6 Ballal RD, Botteman MF, Foley I, Stephens JM, Wilke CT, Joshi AV. Economic evaluation of major knee surgery with recombinant activated factor VII in hemophilia patients with high titer inhibitors and advanced knee arthropathy: exploratory results via literature-based modeling. Curr Med Res Opin 2008; 24 (03) 753-768
- 7 Drummond M, Houwing N, Slothuus U, Giangrande P. Making economic evaluations more helpful for treatment choices in haemophilia. Haemophilia 2017; 23 (02) e58-e66
- 8 Kempton CL, Meeks SL. Toward optimal therapy for inhibitors in hemophilia. Blood 2014; 124 (23) 3365-3372
- 9 Peyvandi F, Ettingshausen CE, Goudemand J, Jiménez-Yuste V, Santagostino E, Makris M. New findings on inhibitor development: from registries to clinical studies. Haemophilia 2017; a; 23 (Suppl. 01) 4-13
- 10 Antunes SV, Tangada S, Stasyshyn O. , et al. Randomized comparison of prophylaxis and on-demand regimens with FEIBA NF in the treatment of haemophilia A and B with inhibitors. Haemophilia 2014; 20 (01) 65-72
- 11 Qi X, Zhao Y, Li K, Fan L, Hua B. Evaluating and monitoring the efficacy of recombinant activated factor VIIa in patients with haemophilia and inhibitors. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2014; 25 (07) 754-760
- 12 Peyvandi F, Mannucci PM, Garagiola I. , et al. A Randomized Trial of Factor VIII and Neutralizing Antibodies in Hemophilia A. N Engl J Med 2016; a; 374 (21) 2054-2064
- 13 Franchini M, Coppola A, Rocino A. , et al; Italian Association of Hemophilia Centers (AICE) Working Group. Systematic review of the role of FVIII concentrates in inhibitor development in previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia a: a 2013 update. Semin Thromb Hemost 2013; 39 (07) 752-766
- 14 Gouw SC, van der Bom JG, Ljung R. , et al; PedNet and RODIN Study Group. Factor VIII products and inhibitor development in severe hemophilia A. N Engl J Med 2013; 368 (03) 231-239
- 15 Fischer K, Lassila R, Peyvandi F. , et al; EUHASS participants. Inhibitor development in haemophilia according to concentrate. Four-year results from the European HAemophilia Safety Surveillance (EUHASS) project. Thromb Haemost 2015; 113 (05) 968-975
- 16 Peyvandi F, Mannucci PM, Palla R, Rosendaal FR. SIPPET: methodology, analysis and generalizability. Haemophilia 2017; 23 (03) 353-361
- 17 Hay CR, Palmer BP, Chalmers EA. , et al. The incidence of factor VIII inhibitors in severe haemophilia A following a major switch from full-length to B-domain-deleted factor VIII: a prospective cohort comparison. Haemophilia 2015; 21 (02) 219-226
- 18 Coppola A, Marrone E, Conca P. , et al. Safety of switching factor VIII products in the era of evolving concentrates: myths and facts. Semin Thromb Hemost 2016; 42 (05) 563-576
- 19 Kempton CL, Soucie JM, Abshire TC. Incidence of inhibitors in a cohort of 838 males with hemophilia A previously treated with factor VIII concentrates. J Thromb Haemost 2006; 4 (12) 2576-2581
- 20 Holstein K, Batorova A, Carvalho M. , et al; European Haemophilia Therapy Strategy Board (EHTSB). Current view and outcome of ITI therapy-A change over time?. Thromb Res 2016; 148: 38-44
- 21 Hay CR, DiMichele DM. ; International Immune Tolerance Study. The principal results of the International Immune Tolerance Study: a randomized dose comparison. Blood 2012; 119 (06) 1335-1344
- 22 Rocino A, Coppola A, Franchini M. , et al; Italian Association of Haemophilia Centres (AICE) Working Party. Principles of treatment and update of recommendations for the management of haemophilia and congenital bleeding disorders in Italy. Blood Transfus 2014; 12 (04) 575-598
- 23 Walsh CE, Jiménez-Yuste V, Auerswald G, Grancha S. The burden of inhibitors in haemophilia patients. Thromb Haemost 2016; 116 (Suppl. 01) S10-S17
- 24 Astermark J, Donfield SM, DiMichele DM. , et al; FENOC Study Group. A randomized comparison of bypassing agents in hemophilia complicated by an inhibitor: the FEIBA NovoSeven Comparative (FENOC) Study. Blood 2007; 109 (02) 546-551
- 25 Messori A, Peyvandi F, Trippoli S, Palla R, Rosendaal FR, Mannucci PM. High-titre inhibitors in previously untreated patients with severe haemophilia A receiving recombinant or plasma-derived factor VIII: a budget-impact analysis. Blood Transfus 2017; b; 15: 1-7
- 26 Abrahamyan L, Willan AR, Beyene J, Mclimont M, Blanchette V, Feldman BM. ; Canadian Hemophilia Primary Prophylaxis (CHPS) Study Group. Using value-of-information methods when the disease is rare and the treatment is expensive--the example of hemophilia A. J Gen Intern Med 2014; 29 (Suppl. 03) S767-S773
- 27 Elder-Lissai A, Hou Q, Krishnan S. The changing costs of caring for hemophilia patients in the u.s.: insurers' and patients' perspectives. Presented at: the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology; December 6–9, 2014; San Francisco, CA. Abstract # 199
- 28 Gringeri A, Mantovani LG, Scalone L, Mannucci PM. ; COCIS Study Group. Cost of care and quality of life for patients with hemophilia complicated by inhibitors: the COCIS Study Group. Blood 2003; 102 (07) 2358-2363
- 29 Maratea D, Fadda V, Trippoli S, Messori A. Economic analysis of not undertaking tenders for recombinant factor VIII procurement: a simplified analysis to estimate an otherwise unknown pharmacoeconomic index. Eur J Hosp Pharm 2016; 23: 219-223
- 30 Colowick AB, Bohn RL, Avorn J, Ewenstein BM. Immune tolerance induction in hemophilia patients with inhibitors: costly can be cheaper. Blood 2000; 96 (05) 1698-1702
- 31 Steen Carlsson K, Astermark J, Donfield S, Berntorp E. Cost and outcome: comparisons of two alternative bypassing agents for persons with haemophilia A complicated by an inhibitor. Thromb Haemost 2008; 99 (06) 1060-1067
- 32 Oldenburg J, Austin SK, Kessler CM. ITI choice for the optimal management of inhibitor patients - from a clinical and pharmacoeconomic perspective. Haemophilia 2014; 20 (Suppl. 06) 17-26
- 33 Rocino A, Franchini M, Coppola A. Treatment and prevention of bleeds in haemophilia patients with inhibitors to factor VIII/IX. J Clin Med 2017; 6 (04) E46
- 34 Rocino A, Cortesi PA, Scalone L, Mantovani LG, Crea R, Gringeri A. ; European Haemophilia Therapy Strategy Board (EHTSB); European Haemophilia Therapy Strategy Board EHTSB. Immune tolerance induction in patients with haemophilia a and inhibitors: effectiveness and cost analysis in an European Cohort (The ITER Study). Haemophilia 2016; 22 (01) 96-102
- 35 Aznar JA, Moret A, Ibáñez F. , et al. Inhibitor development after switching of FVIII concentrate in multitransfused patients with severe haemophilia A. Haemophilia 2014; 20 (05) 624-629
- 36 Sharathkumar A, Lillicrap D, Blanchette VS. , et al. Intensive exposure to factor VIII is a risk factor for inhibitor development in mild hemophilia A. J Thromb Haemost 2003; 1 (06) 1228-1236
- 37 Fischer K, Iorio A, Lassila R. , et al; EUHASS Participants. Inhibitor development in non-severe haemophilia across Europe. Thromb Haemost 2015; 114 (04) 670-675
- 38 Messori A, Peyvandi F, Mengato D, Mannucci PM. Incidence of low-titre factor VIII inhibitors in patients with haemophilia A: meta-analysis of observational studies. Haemophilia 2017; a; 23 (02) e87-e92
- 39 van den Berg HM, Hashemi SM, Fischer K. , et al; PedNet Study group. Increased inhibitor incidence in severe haemophilia A since 1990 attributable to more low titre inhibitors. Thromb Haemost 2016; 115 (04) 729-737
- 40 Meeks SL, Batsuli G. Hemophilia and inhibitors: current treatment options and potential new therapeutic approaches. Hematology (Am Soc Hematol Educ Program) 2016; 2016 (01) 657-662
- 41 Castaman G, Fijnvandraat K. Molecular and clinical predictors of inhibitor risk and its prevention and treatment in mild hemophilia A. Blood 2014; 124 (15) 2333-2336
- 42 Nance D, Fletcher SN, Bolgiano DC, Thompson AR, Josephson NC, Konkle BA. Factor VIII mutation and desmopressin-responsiveness in 62 patients with mild haemophilia A. Haemophilia 2013; 19 (05) 720-726
- 43 Castaman G, Eckhardt C, van Velzen A, Linari S, Fijnvandraat K. Emerging issues in diagnosis, biology, and inhibitor risk in mild hemophilia A. Semin Thromb Hemost 2016; 42 (05) 507-512
- 44 Miners AH. Economic evaluations of prophylaxis with clotting factor for people with severe haemophilia: why do the results vary so much?. Haemophilia 2013; 19 (02) 174-180
- 45 Lyseng-Williamson KA, Plosker GL. Recombinant factor VIIa (eptacog alfa): a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in haemophilia in patients with inhibitors to clotting factors VIII or IX. Pharmacoeconomics 2007; 25 (12) 1007-1029
- 46 Astermark J, Rocino A, Von Depka M. , et al; EHTSB. Current use of by-passing agents in Europe in the management of acute bleeds in patients with haemophilia and inhibitors. Haemophilia 2007; 13 (01) 38-45
- 47 Jimenez-Yuste V, Núñez R, Romero JA, Montoro B, Espinós B. Cost-effectiveness of recombinant activated factor VII vs. plasma-derived activated prothrombin complex concentrate in the treatment of mild-to-moderate bleeding episodes in patients with severe haemophilia A and inhibitors in Spain. Haemophilia 2013; 19 (06) 841-846
- 48 Salaj P, Penka M, Smejkal P. , et al. Economic analysis of recombinant activated factor VII versus plasma-derived activated prothrombin complex concentrate in mild to moderate bleeds: haemophilia registry data from the Czech Republic. Thromb Res 2012; 129 (05) e233-e237
- 49 Villarrubia R, Oyagüez I, Álvarez-Román MT, Mingot-Castellano ME, Parra R, Casado MA. Cost analysis of prophylaxis with activated prothrombin complex concentrate vs. on-demand therapy with activated factor VII in severe haemophilia A patients with inhibitors, in Spain. Haemophilia 2015; 21 (03) 320-329
- 50 Coppola A, Windyga J, Tufano A, Yeung C, Di Minno MN. Treatment for preventing bleeding in people with haemophilia or other congenital bleeding disorders undergoing surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (02) CD009961
- 51 Shapiro AD, Gilchrist GS, Hoots WK, Cooper HA, Gastineau DA. Prospective, randomised trial of two doses of rFVIIa (NovoSeven) in haemophilia patients with inhibitors undergoing surgery. Thromb Haemost 1998; 80 (05) 773-778
- 52 Pruthi RK, Mathew P, Valentino LA, Sumner MJ, Seremetis S, Hoots WK. ; NovoSeven in Surgery Study Investigators. Haemostatic efficacy and safety of bolus and continuous infusion of recombinant factor VIIa are comparable in haemophilia patients with inhibitors undergoing major surgery. Results from an open-label, randomized, multicenter trial. Thromb Haemost 2007; 98 (04) 726-732
- 53 Pokras SM, Petrilla AA, Weatherall J, Lee WC. The economics of inpatient on-demand treatment for haemophilia with high-responding inhibitors: a US retrospective data analysis. Haemophilia 2012; 18 (02) 284-290
- 54 Shima M, Hanabusa H, Taki M. , et al. Factor VIII-mimetic function of humanized bispecific antibody in hemophilia A. N Engl J Med 2016; 374 (21) 2044-2053
- 55 Hay CR. Purchasing factor concentrates in the 21st century through competitive tendering. Haemophilia 2013; 19 (05) 660-667