Measuring Electronic Health Record Use in Primary Care: A Scoping Review

Abstract

Background Simple measures of electronic health record (EHR) adoption may be inadequate to evaluate EHR use; and positive outcomes associated with EHRs may be better gauged when varying degrees of EHR use are taken into account. In this article, we aim to assess the current state of the literature regarding measuring EHR use.

Objective This article conducts a scoping review of the literature to identify and classify measures of primary care EHR use with a focus on the Canadian context.

Methods We conducted a scoping review. Multiple citation databases were searched, as well as gray literature from relevant Web sites. Resulting abstracts were screened for inclusion. Included full texts were reviewed by two authors. Data from the articles were extracted; we synthesized the findings. Subsequently, we reviewed these results with seven EHR stakeholders in Canada.

Results Thirty-seven articles were included. Eighteen measured EHR function use individually, while 19 incorporated an overall level of use. Eight frameworks for characterizing overall EHR use were identified.

Conclusion There is a need to create standardized frameworks for assessing EHR use.

Keywords

electronic health records - computerized medical record - electronic medical records - meaningful use - primary care - scoping review

Authors' Contributions

M.Z.H.: Concept and design of study; data collection; data analysis and interpretation; draft of manuscript; approval of final version of manuscript. A.L.T.: Concept and design of study; data collection; data analysis and interpretation; draft of manuscript components; revisions of manuscript; approval of final version of manuscript. C.J.G.: Concept and design of study; revision of manuscript; approval of final version of manuscript.

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

This review received ethics approval from the Health Sciences Research Ethics Board at The University of Western Ontario.

• References

• 1 Protti D. Comparison of information technology in general practice in 10 countries. Healthc Q 2007; 10 (02) 107-116
• 2 Canadian Medical Association. How can Canada achieve enhanced use of electronic medical records? 2014. Available at: https://www.cma.ca/Assets/assets-library/document/en/advocacy/Enhanced-Use-of-EMRs-Discussion-Paper-Final-May-2014.pdf . Accessed February 26, 2016
• 3 Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The “meaningful use” regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med 2010; 363 (06) 501-504
• 4 Canada Health Infoway. Infoway invests $380 million to help physicians and nurse practitioners implement electronic medical record (EMR) systems. 2011. Available at: https://www.infoway-inforoute.ca/en/what-we-do/news-events/newsroom/2011-news-releases/137-infoway-invests-380-million-to-help-physicians-and-nurse-practitioners-implement-electronic-medical-record-emr-systems . Accessed March 14, 2016
• 5 Schoen C, Osborn R, Squires D. , et al. A survey of primary care doctors in ten countries shows progress in use of health information technology, less in other areas. Health Aff (Millwood) 2012; 31 (12) 2805-2816
• 6 Osborn R, Moulds D, Schneider EC, Doty MM, Squires D, Sarnak DO. Primary care physicians in ten countries report challenges caring for patients with complex health needs. Health Aff (Millwood) 2015; 34 (12) 2104-2112
• 7 Chang F, Gupta N. Progress in electronic medical record adoption in Canada. Can Fam Physician 2015; 61 (12) 1076-1084
• 8 Canada Health Infoway. Backgrounder: Electronic Medical Records (EMR) Progress in Canada. 2016. Available at: https://www.infoway-inforoute.ca/en/component/edocman/2860-2016-electronic-medical-records-emr-progress-in-canada/view-document . Accessed April 21, 2017
• 9 PwC. The emerging benefits of electronic medical record use in community-based care. 2013. Available at: https://www.infoway-inforoute.ca/en/component/edocman/1224-the-emerging-benefits-of-electronic-medical-record-use-in-community-based-care-full-report/view-document . Accessed April 21, 2017
• 10 PwC. The emerging benefits of EMR use in ambulatory care in Canada: Benefits Evaluation Study. 2016. Available at: https://www.infoway-inforoute.ca/en/component/edocman/3025-the-emerging-benefits-of-emr-use-in-ambulatory-care-in-canada-full-report/view-document . Accessed April 21, 2017
• 11 Reed M, Huang J, Graetz I. , et al. Outpatient electronic health records and the clinical care and outcomes of patients with diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med 2012; 157 (07) 482-489
• 12 Kern LM, Barrón Y, Dhopeshwarkar RV, Kaushal R. Health information exchange and ambulatory quality of care. Appl Clin Inform 2012; 3 (02) 197-209
• 13 Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S. , et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144 (10) 742-752
• 14 Furukawa MF. Electronic medical records and efficiency and productivity during office visits. Am J Manag Care 2011; 17 (04) 296-303
• 15 Linder JA, Ma J, Bates DW, Middleton B, Stafford RS. Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167 (13) 1400-1405
• 16 Han YY, Carcillo JA, Venkataraman ST. , et al. Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system. Pediatrics 2005; 116 (06) 1506-1512
• 17 Baron RJ. Quality improvement with an electronic health record: achievable, but not automatic. Ann Intern Med 2007; 147 (08) 549-552
• 18 Friedberg MW, Coltin KL, Safran DG, Dresser M, Zaslavsky AM, Schneider EC. Associations between structural capabilities of primary care practices and performance on selected quality measures. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151 (07) 456-463
• 19 Crosson JC, Stroebel C, Scott JG, Stello B, Crabtree BF. Implementing an electronic medical record in a family medicine practice: communication, decision making, and conflict. Ann Fam Med 2005; 3 (04) 307-311
• 20 Jang Y, Lortie MA, Sanche S. Return on investment in electronic health records in primary care practices: a mixed-methods study. JMIR Med Inform 2014; 2 (02) e25
• 21 Ontario MD. Navigating eHealth in Ontario: a Physician Lens. 2015. Available at: http://www.coachorg.com/en/newsandevents/resources/ONUP15/SHutchison_OntarioMD.pdf . Accessed April 21, 2017
• 22 Price M, Lau F, Lai J. Measuring EMR adoption: a framework and case study. Electr Healthc 2011; 10 (01) e23-e28
• 23 Adler-Milstein J, Holmgren AJ, Kralovec P, Worzala C, Searcy T, Patel V. Electronic health record adoption in US hospitals: the emergence of a digital “advanced use” divide. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017; 24 (06) 1142-1148
• 24 Jha AK, DesRoches CM, Campbell EG. , et al. Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. N Engl J Med 2009; 360 (16) 1628-1638
• 25 Stewart M, Ryan B. Ecology of health care in Canada. Can Fam Physician 2015; 61 (05) 449-453
• 26 Green LA, Fryer Jr GE, Yawn BP, Lanier D, Dovey SM. The ecology of medical care revisited. N Engl J Med 2001; 344 (26) 2021-2025
• 27 Canada Health Infoway. Understanding EHRs, EMRs and PHRs. Available at: https://www.infoway-inforoute.ca/en/what-we-do/digital-health-and-you/understanding-ehrs-emrs-and-phrs . Accessed October 11, 2017
• 28 Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2005; 8 (01) 19-32
• 29 Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci 2010; 5: 69
• 30 U.S. National Library of Medicine. MEDLINE/PubMed Search & Electronic Health Record Information Resources. 2015. Available at: https://www.nlm.nih.gov/services/queries/ehr.html . Accessed December 1, 2017
• 31 Belz NE. Advanced use of electronic health records in patient-centered medical homes [dissertation]. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas; 2015
• 32 Bowes III WA. Measuring use of electronic health record functionality using system audit information. Stud Health Technol Inform 2010; 160 (Pt 1): 86-90
• 33 Goetz Goldberg D, Kuzel AJ, Feng LB, DeShazo JP, Love LE. EHRs in primary care practices: benefits, challenges, and successful strategies. Am J Manag Care 2012; 18 (02) e48-e54
• 34 Gordon SH, Baier RR, Gardner RL. Primary care physicians' use of electronic health records in Rhode Island: 2009–2014. R I Med J (2013) 2015; 98 (10) 29-32
• 35 Hogan SO, Kissam SM. Measuring meaningful use. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010; 29 (04) 601-606
• 36 Hsiao C-J, Jha AK, King J, Patel V, Furukawa MF, Mostashari F. Office-based physicians are responding to incentives and assistance by adopting and using electronic health records. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013; 32 (08) 1470-1477
• 37 Lanham HJ, Sittig DF, Leykum LK, Parchman ML, Pugh JA, McDaniel RR. Understanding differences in electronic health record (EHR) use: linking individual physicians' perceptions of uncertainty and EHR use patterns in ambulatory care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014; 21 (01) 73-81
• 38 Li C. Use of health information technology by office-based physicians: comparison of two contemporaneous public-use physician surveys. Perspect Health Inf Manag 2011; 8: 1f
• 39 Makam AN, Lanham HJ, Batchelor K. , et al. Use and satisfaction with key functions of a common commercial electronic health record: a survey of primary care providers. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013; 13: 86
• 40 McClellan SR, Casalino LP, Shortell SM, Rittenhouse DR. When does adoption of health information technology by physician practices lead to use by physicians within the practice?. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013; 20 (e1): e26-e32
• 41 Meehan Sr TP, Meehan Jr TP, Kelvey-Albert M, Van Hoof TJ, Ruth S, Petrillo MK. The path to quality in outpatient practice: meaningful use, patient-centered medical homes, financial incentives, and technical assistance. Am J Med Qual 2014; 29 (04) 284-291
• 42 Ornstein SM, Nemeth LS, Nietert PJ, Jenkins RG, Wessell AM, Litvin CB. Learning from primary care meaningful use exemplars. J Am Board Fam Med 2015; 28 (03) 360-370
• 43 Pfoh ER, Abramson E, Zandieh S, Edwards A, Kaushal R. Satisfaction after the transition between electronic health record systems at six ambulatory practices. J Eval Clin Pract 2012; 18 (06) 1133-1139
• 44 Poon EG, Wright A, Simon SR. , et al. Relationship between use of electronic health record features and health care quality: results of a statewide survey. Med Care 2010; 48 (03) 203-209
• 45 Riddell MC, Sandford KG, Johnson AO, Steltenkamp C, Pearce KA. Achieving meaningful use of electronic health records (EHRs) in primary care: proposed critical processes from the Kentucky Ambulatory Network (KAN). J Am Board Fam Med 2014; 27 (06) 772-779
• 46 Shin P, Sharac J. Readiness for meaningful use of health information technology and patient centered medical home recognition survey results. Medicare Medicaid Res Rev 2013; 3 (04) mmrr.003.04.b01
• 47 Wright A, Feblowitz J, Samal L, McCoy AB, Sittig DF. The Medicare Electronic Health Record Incentive Program: provider performance on core and menu measures. Health Serv Res 2014; 49 (1 Pt 2): 325-346
• 48 Xiao N, Sharman R, Singh R, Singh G, Danzo A, Rao HR. “Meaningful Use” of ambulatory EMR: does it improve the quality and efficiency of health care?. Heal Policy Technol 2012; 1 (01) 28-34
• 49 Zhou L, Soran CS, Jenter CA. , et al. The relationship between electronic health record use and quality of care over time. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009; 16 (04) 457-464
• 50 Rao SR, Desroches CM, Donelan K, Campbell EG, Miralles PD, Jha AK. Electronic health records in small physician practices: availability, use, and perceived benefits. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011; 18 (03) 271-275
• 51 Simon SR, McCarthy ML, Kaushal R. , et al. Electronic health records: which practices have them, and how are clinicians using them?. J Eval Clin Pract 2008; 14 (01) 43-47
• 52 Miller RH, Sim I, Newman J. Electronic medical records in solo/small groups: a qualitative study of physician user types. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004; 107 (Pt 1): 658-662
• 53 Wilcox A, Bowes WA, Thornton SN, Narus SP. Physician use of outpatient electronic health records to improve care. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008; 809-813
• 54 Singh R, Lichter MI, Danzo A, Taylor J, Rosenthal T. The adoption and use of health information technology in rural areas: results of a national survey. J Rural Health 2012; 28 (01) 16-27
• 55 Lanham HJ, Leykum LK, McDaniel Jr RR. Same organization, same electronic health records (EHRs) system, different use: exploring the linkage between practice member communication patterns and EHR use patterns in an ambulatory care setting. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012; 19 (03) 382-391
• 56 Felt-Lisk S, Johnson L, Fleming C, Shapiro R, Natzke B. Toward understanding EHR use in small physician practices. Health Care Financ Rev 2010; 31 (01) 11-22
• 57 Paré G, Raymond L, Guinea AO. , et al. Electronic health record usage behaviors in primary care medical practices: a survey of family physicians in Canada. Int J Med Inform 2015; 84 (10) 857-867
• 58 Raymond L, Paré G, Ortiz de Guinea A. , et al. Improving performance in medical practices through the extended use of electronic medical record systems: a survey of Canadian family physicians. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2015; 15: 27
• 59 Tagg BL. Meaningful electronic medical record use: a survey of family practice clinics [dissertation]. Lethbridge, AB, Canada: University of Lethbridge; 2015
• 60 Price M, Singer A, Kim J. Adopting electronic medical records: are they just electronic paper records?. Can Fam Physician 2013; 59 (07) e322-e329
• 61 Rimmer C, Hagens S, Baldwin A, Anderson CJ. Measuring maturity of use for electronic medical records (EMRs) in British Columbia: the Physician Information Technology Office (PITO). Healthc Q 2014; 17 (04) 75-80
• 62 COACH. Canada's Health Informatics Association [Internet]. Canadian EMR Adoption and Maturity Model: a multi-jurisdiction Collaborative and Common EMR Adoption & Maturity Model White Paper. 2013. Available upon request from COACH
• 63 Dombrosky D. Saskatchewan eHealth Conference: Evolution of Patient Care through EMRs. 2014. Available at: https://www.cps.sk.ca/Documents/1409-EMR_conference-web.pdf . Accessed April 21, 2017
• 64 Djalali S, Ursprung N, Rosemann T, Senn O, Tandjung R. Undirected health IT implementation in ambulatory care favors paper-based workarounds and limits health data exchange. Int J Med Inform 2015; 84 (11) 920-932
• 65 Gillies A. Information support for general practice in the new NHS. Health Info Libr J 2000; 17 (02) 91-96
• 66 Manuel DG, Maaten S, Thiruchelvam D, Jaakkimainen L, Upshur R. Primary care in the health care system. In: Jaakkimainen L, Upshur REG, Klein-Geltink JE, Leong A, Schultz SE, Wang L. , eds. Primary Care in Ontario: ICES Atlas. Toronto, Canada: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; 2006: 1-14
• 67 Government of Canada. Canada's Health Care System. Available at: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/health-care-system/reports-publications/health-care-system/canada.html . Accessed October 19, 2017
• 68 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Certified EHR Technology. 2016. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/regulations-and-guidance/legislation/ehrincentiveprograms/certification.html . Accessed February 28, 2016
• 69 HIMSS Analytics. Continuity of Care Maturity Model. Available at: https://app.himssanalytics.org/emram/continuity.aspx . Accessed February 28, 2016
• 70 Boonstra A, Broekhuis M. Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions. BMC Health Serv Res 2010; 10 (01) 231
• 71 Terry AL, Stewart M, Fortin M. , et al. Stepping up to the plate: an agenda for research and policy action on electronic medical records in Canadian primary healthcare. Healthc Policy 2016; 12 (02) 19-32
• 72 Terry AL, Stewart M, Fortin M. , et al. Gaps in primary healthcare electronic medical record research and knowledge: findings of a pan-Canadian study. Healthc Policy 2014; 10 (01) 46-59
• 73 Lau F, Price M, Boyd J, Partridge C, Bell H, Raworth R. Impact of electronic medical record on physician practice in office settings: a systematic review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2012; 12 (01) 10
• 74 Harris/Decima. National Survey of Canadian Nurses: Use of Digital Health Technologies in Practice. 2014. Available at: https://www.infoway-inforoute.ca/en/component/edocman/resources/reports/clinical-adoption/1913-national-survey-of-canadian-nurses-use-of-digital-health-technologies-in-practice . Accessed April 21, 2017
• 75 Harris/Decima. 2015 Ambulatory EMR Landscape survey. 2016. Available at: https://www.infoway-inforoute.ca/en/component/edocman/3023-ambulatory-emr-landscape-survey/view-document . Accessed April 21, 2017