Thromb Haemost 1999; 82(02): 918-924
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1615933
Research Article
Schattauer GmbH

Prophylaxis of Venous Thromboembolism Following Orthopedic Surgery: Mechanical and Pharmacological Approaches and the Need for Extended Prophylaxis

G.F Pineo
1   Thrombosis Research Unit, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CANADA
,
R.D. Hull
1   Thrombosis Research Unit, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CANADA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
09 December 2017 (online)

Zoom Image

Introduction

Major orthopedic surgery, particularly total joint replacement or hip fracture, represents a high risk of future development of postoperative venous thromboembolism and warrants the routine use of prophylaxis with either mechanical devices or pharmacological agents. The aim of prophylaxis is to prevent fatal pulmonary embolism (PE) and the morbidity of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), particularly the development of post-thrombotic syndrome. Patterns of clinical practice, with respect to the prevention of venous thromboembolism and the appropriate use of anticoagulants for the treatment of thrombotic disease, have been strongly influenced by recent consensus conferences.1,2 Rules of evidence for assessing the literature have been applied to all recommendations regarding the prevention and treatment of thrombotic disease. These results were extrapolated using evidence gleaned from major clinical disorders and are based only on nonrandomized clinical trials or case series.1-3 Data from a large number of Level I clinical trials in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery have provided answers to many of the questions regarding prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism. In this review, we will discuss the prevention of venous thromboembolism following orthopedic surgery and discuss some of the controversial issues where further studies are required.

Crossref Cited-by logo
Article Citations