Thromb Haemost 1999; 82(02): 983-986
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1615942
Research Article
Schattauer GmbH

Thrombolysis in Acute Cerebrovascular Disease: Indications and Limitations

Werner Hacke
1   Department of Neurology, Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg, Heidelberg, GERMANY
,
Peter Ringleb
1   Department of Neurology, Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg, Heidelberg, GERMANY
,
Robert Stingele
1   Department of Neurology, Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg, Heidelberg, GERMANY
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
09 December 2017 (online)

Preview

Introduction

Large-scale trials have shown that thrombolytic therapy reduces mortality and preserves left ventricular function in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). As most ischemic strokes are thromboembolic in origin,1 there appears to be a rationale for the use of thrombolytic agents in the management of ischemic stroke.

Thrombolytic agents differ in their mechanisms of action, but in general, they act by promoting the conversion of plasminogen into plasmin, resulting in fibrin degradation and clot dissolution. Streptokinase and recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) are the agents that have been the most widely investigated in stroke studies. Ancrod, the active agent in the venom of the Malayan pit viper, is primarily considered an anticoagulant, although it does stimulate endogenous t-PA release from the vascular endothelium and may enhance local thrombolysis. Urokinase is used in local, intra-arterial thrombolysis but has not been subjected to large clinical trials since computed tomography (CT) diagnosis became widely available.