Go und die Moral in Südkorea

• Literatur

• 1 Anonymus. Calculating machine psychs out grandmaster. New Scientist. 1997 2082 ( www.news cientist.com/article/mg15420821–700-calculating-machine-psychs-out-grandmaster ).
• 2 Asakawa N. Flaws in AI seen despite AlphaGo victory. Nikkei Asian Review 20.3.2016 ( http://asia.nikkei.com/Tech-Science/Tech/Flaws-in-AI-seen-despite-AlphaGo-victory?page=1 ).
• 3 Rutkin A. Anything you can do .... New Scientist 2016; 3065: 20-21.
• 4 Schaeffer J. Marion Tinsley: Human Perfection at Checkers?. Games of No Chance 1996; 29: 115-118.
• 5 Schaeffer J, Burch N, Björnsson Y, Kishimoto A, Müller M, Lake R, Lu P, Sutphen S. Checkers is solved. Science 2007; 317: 1518-1522.
• 6 Spitzer M. Selbstbestimmen. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag; 2003
• 7 Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton: University Press; 1944
• 8 Zastrow M. Google victory at Go stokes AI fear in Korea. New Scientist 2016; 3065: 9.
• 9 Zastrow M. Machnine outsmarts man in battle oft he decade. New Scientist 2016; 3065: 21.
• 10 Zastrow M. How victory for Google’s Go AI is stoking fear in South Korea. New Scientist 2016; 3065: 19 März 2016.
• 11 Zastrow M. ‘I’m in shock!’ How an AI beat the world’s best human at Go. New Scientist Daily News 9. März 2016 ( www.newscientist.com/article/2079871-im-in-shock-how-an-ai-beat-the-worlds-best-human-at-go ).
• 12 Silver D. et al Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature 2016; 529: 484-489.
• 13 Anonymus. [Editoria] Digital intuition. A computer program that can outplay humans in the abstract game of Go will redefine our relationship with machines. Nature 2016; 529: 437.