Download PDF
Hamostaseologie 2008; 28(05): 438-447
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1617190
Hämostaseologie
Schattauer GmbH

Antithrombotische und thrombolytische Therapie beim akuten Koronarsyndrom

Anticoagulant and thrombolytic agents in acute coronary syndromes
M. Schwarz
1   Abteilung Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie und Angiologie, Medizinische Universitätsklinik Freiburg
,
B. Saurbier
1   Abteilung Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie und Angiologie, Medizinische Universitätsklinik Freiburg
,
C. Bode
1   Abteilung Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie und Angiologie, Medizinische Universitätsklinik Freiburg
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
29 December 2017 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Unter dem Begriff des akuten Koronarsyndroms (ACS) werden die instabilen und somit lebensbedrohlichen Formen der klinisch manifesten koronaren Herzkrankheit zusammengefasst. Dies sind die instabile Angina pectoris, der Nicht-ST-Streckenhebung- (NSTEMI) und der ST-Streckenhebungs- Myokardinfarkt (STEMI) sowie der plötzliche Herztod. Wichtigstes therapeutisches Ziel ist die rasche und vollständige Wiedereröffnung der eingeengten oder verschlossenen Koronararterie, um das Ausmaß der Myokardnekrose zu minimieren. Therapie der Wahl ist hierfür die primäre perkutane Koronarintervention (PCI), wenn diese innerhalb von zwei Stunden von einem erfahrenen Team vorgenommen werden kann. Als alternative Reperfusionsstrategie steht für alle anderen Patienten die Thrombolyse zur Verfügung. Neben einer schnellen Reperfusion ist auch die optimale gerinnungs- und aggregationshemmende Therapie essenziell. Die Balance zwischen effektiver Gerinnungsinhibition einerseits und Blutungsgefährdung andererseits ist dabei Prognose entscheidend. Zahlreiche Neuentwicklungen in diesem Bereich bringen uns diesem Ziel immer näher. Dieser Übersichtsartikel gibt einen Überblick über die aktuellen Empfehlungen und einen Ausblick auf die Neuentwicklungen in diesem Bereich.

Summary

The term acute coronary syndrome (ACS) pertains to the instable and life-threatening forms of a clinically manifest coronary artery disease with biochemical and/or electro - cardiographic evidence of myocyte cell death. In detail, it includes the unstable angina pectoris, the non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) the ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and as well the sudden cardiac death. As early reperfusion of ischaemic myocardium is the most effective way for limiting infarct size by restoring the balance between myocardial oxygen supply and demand, it is the most important therapeutic goal to achieve early and complete antegrade flow in the occluded or restricted vessel, related with a reduction of short and longtime complications as heart failure and severe arrhythmias. It is generally accepted, that the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the method of choice in acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) to restore TIMI-3 blood flow in occluded coronary arteries, if this can be performed within two hours of symptom onset and by a highly specialized team. Since these requirements are only met in 20% of hospitals caring for patients with STEMI in Germany, the therapy with thrombolytic and anticoagulant agents plays still an important role. Apart from a rapid and effective prehospital primary care, it depends furthermore on a differentiated anticoagulatory and antithrombotic therapy during coronary intervention to get optimal results.

Schlüsselwörter

Akutes Koronarsyndrom - primäre perkutane Koronarintervention - Fibrinolyse - Thrombozytenaggregationshemmung

Keywords

Acute coronary syndrome - percutaneous coronary intervention - fibrinolytic therapy - antithrombin therapy - antiplatelet therapy
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 A comparison of aspirin plus tirofiban with aspirin plus heparin for unstable angina.. Platelet Receptor Inhibition in Ischemic Syndrome Management (PRISM) Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 1498-1505.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 A comparison of reteplase with alteplase for acute myocardial infarction.. The Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO III) Investigators. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 1118-1123.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction.. The GUSTO investigators. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 673-682.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Andersen HR, Nielsen TT, Rasmussen K. et al. A comparison of coronary angioplasty with fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 733-742.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW. et al. ACC/ AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction – executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 671-719.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Antman EM, Giugliano RP, Gibson CM. et al. Abciximab facilitates the rate and extent of thrombolysis: results of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 14 trial. The TIMI 14 Investigators. Circulation 1999; 99: 2720-2732.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Antman EM, Morrow DA, McCabe CH. et al. Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin with fibrinolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 1477-1488.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Arntz HR. Prehospital accommodation of patients with acute coronary syndrome Summary position paper of the German Society for Cardiological, Heart and Circulatory Research e. V. and the German Interdisciplinary Coalition for Intensive and Emergency Medicine. Zeitschrift für Kardiologie 2004; 93: 915-916.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Bassand JP, Hamm CW, Ardissino D. et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-STsegment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 1598-1660.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Cannon CP, Gibson CM, McCabe CH. et al. TNKtissue plasminogen activator compared with front- loaded alteplase in acute myocardial infarction: results of the TIMI 10B trial. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 10B Investigators. Circulation 1998; 98: 2805-2814.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Cohen M, Demers C, Gurfinkel EP. et al. A comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin with unfractionated heparin for unstable coronary artery disease. Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q-Wave Coronary Events Study Group. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 447-452.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Efficacy and safety of tenecteplase in combination with enoxaparin, abciximab, or unfractionated heparin: the ASSENT-3 randomised trial in acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 2001; 358: 605-613.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Franzosi MG, Santoro E, De Vita C. et al. Ten-year follow-up of the first megatrial testing thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results of the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell‘Infarto-1 study. The GISSI Investigators. Circulation 1998; 98: 2659-2665.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Hamm CW, Goldmann BU, Heeschen C. et al. Emergency room triage of patients with acute chest pain by means of rapid testing for cardiac troponin T or troponin I. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 1648-1653.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hamm CW, Ravkilde J, Gerhardt W. et al. The prognostic value of serum troponin T in unstable angina. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 146-150.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hirsch A, Windhausen F, Tijssen JG. et al. Longterm outcome after an early invasive versus selective invasive treatment strategy in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome and elevated cardiac troponin T (the ICTUS trial): a follow-up study. Lancet 2007; 369: 827-835.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Intravenous NPA for the treatment of infarcting myocardium early; InTIME-II, a double-blind comparison of single-bolus lanoteplase vs accelerated alteplase for the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 2005-2013.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Intravenous streptokinase given within 0–4 hours of onset of myocardial infarction reduced mortality in ISIS-2. Lancet 1987; 1: 502.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet 2003; 361: 13-20.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Libby P. Current concepts of the pathogenesis of the acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 2001; 104: 365-372.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Neuhaus KL, Molhoek GP, Zeymer U. et al. Recombinant hirudin (lepirudin) for the improvement of thrombolysis with streptokinase in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results of the HIT-4 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34: 966-973.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Neuhaus KL, von Essen R, Tebbe U. et al. Improved thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction with front-loaded administration of alteplase: results of the rt-PA-APSAC patency study (TAPS). J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 885-891.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Nguyen TA, Diodati JG, Pharand C. Resistance to clopidogrel: a review of the evidence. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 1157-1164.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Oler A, Whooley MA, Oler J, Grady D. Adding heparin to aspirin reduces the incidence of myocardial infarction and death in patients with unstable angina. A meta-analysis. JAMA 1996; 276: 811-815.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Perzborn E, Kubitza D, Misselwitz F. Rivaroxaban. A novel, oral, direct factor Xa-inhibitor in clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thrombembolic disorders. Hämostaseologie 2007; 27: 282-289.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Primary versus tenecteplase-facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with STsegment elevation acute myocardial infarction (ASSENT-4 PCI): randomised trial. Lancet 2006; 367: 569-578.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Ross R. Atherosclerosis is an inflammatory disease. Am Heart J 1999; 138: S419-420.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Smalling RW, Bode C, Kalbfleisch J. et al. More rapid, complete, and stable coronary thrombolysis with bolus administration of reteplase compared with alteplase infusion in acute myocardial infarction. RAPID Investigators. Circulation 1995; 91: 2725-2732.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Stone GW, Bertrand ME, Moses JW. et al. Routine upstream initiation vs deferred selective use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: the ACUITY Timing trial. JAMA 2007; 297: 591-602.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Topol EJ, Moliterno DJ, Herrmann HC. et al. Comparison of two platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, tirofiban and abciximab, for the prevention of ischemic events with percutaneous coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 1888-1894.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Van den Werft F. et al. Safety assessment of singlebolus administration of TNK tissue-plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction: the ASSENT- 1 trial. Am Heart J 1999; 137: 786-791.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Van den Werft F. et al. Single-bolus tenecteplase compared with front-loaded alteplase in acute myocardial infarction: the ASSENT-2 doubleblind randomised trial. Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic (ASSENT-2) Investigators. Lancet 1999; 354: 716-722.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH. et al. Intensive oral antiplatelet therapy for reduction of ischaemic events including stent thrombosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with percutaneous coronary intervention and stenting in the TRITON-TIMI 38 trial: a subanalysis of a randomised trial. Lancet 2008; 371: 1353-1363.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH. et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2001-2015.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Yusuf S, Mehta SR, Chrolavicius S. et al. Effects of fondaparinux on mortality and reinfarction in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the OASIS-6 randomized trial. JAMA 2006; 295: 1519-1530.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar