Download PDF
Phlebologie 2004; 33(04): 131-134
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1617286
Original Articles
Schattauer GmbH

Leitlinie[*]: Phlebologischer Kompressionsverband

Entwicklungsstufe S1, IDA Ø
V. Wienert
,
F. Waldermann
,
M. Zabel
,
E. Rabe
,
M. Jünger
Further Information

Publication History

Eingegangen: 16 May 2004



Publication Date:
29 December 2017 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

 

* Diese Leitlinie wurde im Auftrag der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Phlebologie (DGP) ausgearbeitet, vom Vorstand und im wissenschaftlichen Beirat der DGP am 5. Mai 2004 verabschiedet. Diese Leitlinie berücksichtigt den aktuellen Stand der Literatur, aber nicht die in jedem Fall unterschiedliche Zulassungsbestimmungen für die verschiedenen Pharmaka.


 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Badger CMA, Peacock JL, Mortimer PP. A randomized, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial. Comparing multilayer bandaging followed by hosiery versus hosiery alone in the treatment of patients with lymphedema of the limb. Cancer 2000; 88: 2832-7.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Batch AJ, Wickremsinghe SS, Gannon ME. et al. Randomised trial of bandaging after sclerotherapy for varicose veins. Br Med J 1980; 281: 423.
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Bond R, Whyman MR, Wilkins DC. et al. A randomised trial of different compression dressings following varicose vein surgery. Phlebology 1999; 14: 9-11.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Callam MJ, Harper DR, Dale JJ. et al. Lothian and Fort Valley leg ulcer healing trial, Part 1: Elastic versus non-elastic bandaging in the treatment of chronic leg ulceration. Phlebology 1992; 7: 136-41.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cordts PR, Hanrahan LM, Rodriguez AA. et al. A prospective, randomized trial of Unna’s boot versus Duoderm CGF hydroactive dressing plus compression in the management of venous leg ulcers. J Vasc Surg 1992; 15: 480-6.
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Danielsen L, Madsen SM, Henriksen L. Venous leg ulcer healing: A randomized prospective study of long-stretch versus short-stretch compression bandages. Phlebology 1998; 13: 59-63.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Gould DJ, Campbell S, Harding EF. Short stretch vs. long stretch bandages in the management of chronic venous leg ulcers. Phlebology 1993; 8: 43.
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Gould DJ, Campbell S, Newton H. et al. Setopress vs. Elastocrepe in chronic venous ulceration. Br J Nurs 1998; 7: 66-73.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Harper DR, Ruckley CV, Dale JJ. et al. Prevention of recurrence of chronic leg ulcer: A randomised trial of different degress of compression. In: Raymond-Martimbeau P, Prescott M, Zummo M. (eds). Phlebologie ’92. Paris: John Libbey Eurotext; 1992: 902-3
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Hendricks WM, Roger T, Swallow T. et al. Management of stasis leg ulcers with Unna’s boots versus elastic support stockings. J Am Acad Dermatol 1985; 12: 90-8.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Horakova MA, Partsch H. Ulceres de jambe d’origine veineuse: Indications pour les bas de compression?. Phlébologie 1994; 47: 53-7.
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Johannson K, Albertsson M, Ingvar C. et al. Effects of compression bandaging with or without manual lymph drainage treatment in patients with postoperative arm lymphoedema. Lymphology 1999; 32: 103-10.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Meyer FJ, Burnand KG, Lagatolla RF. et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of two bandaging regimes in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 40-4.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Partsch H, Damstra RJ, Tazelaar DJ. et al. Multicentre, randomised controlled trial of forlayer bandaging versus short-stretch bandaging in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Vasa 2001; 30: 108-13.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Raj TB, Makin GS. A random controlled trial of two forms of compression bandaging in outpatient sclerotherapy of varicose veins. J Surg Res 1981; 31: 440-5.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Rodrigus I, Bleyn J. For how long do we have to advise elastic support after varicose vein surgery? A prospective randomized study. Phlebology 1991; 6: 95-8.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Rubin JR, Alexander J, Placha EJ. et al. Unna’s boot vs. polyurethane foam dressings for the treatment of venous ulceration. Arch Surg 1990; 125: 489-90.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Scriven JM, Bell PRF, Taylor LE. et al. A prospective randomised trial of four-layer versus short stretch compression bandages for the treatment of venous leg ulcers. J R Coll Surg England 1998; 80: 215-20.
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Taylor A, Taylor R, Marcuson R. Comparative healing rates and lost of conventional and fourlayer treatment of venous ulcers. Phlebology 1995; 10: 85.
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Taylor AD, Taylor RJ, Marcuson RW. et al. Prospective comparison of healing rates and therapy costs for conventional and four-layerhigh- compression bandaging treatments of venous leg ulcers. Phlebology 1998; 13: 20-4.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Ukat A, Konig M, Vanscheidt W. et al. Shortstretch versus multilayer compression for venous leg ulcers: a comparison of healing rates. J Wound Care 2003; 12: 139-43.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Wilkinson E, Buttfied R, Cooper C. et al. Trial of two bandaging systems for chronic venous leg ulcers. J Wound Care 1997; 6: 339-40.
    Google Scholar