Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21(03): 221-230
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1617365
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Total hip arthroplasty outcomes assessment using functional and radiographic scores to compare canine systems

D. Iwata
1   School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
,
H. C. Broun
2   Adelaide Veterinary Specialist and Referral Centre, Norwood, South Australia, Australia
,
A. P. Black
3   Northern Sydney Vet Specialist Centre, Nth Turramurra, New South Wales, Australia
,
C. A. Preston
4   Animal Surgical Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
,
G. I. Anderson
5   School of Veterinary Science, University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 18 February 2008

Accepted 06 April 2008

Publication Date:
12 January 2018 (online)

Summary

A retrospective multi-centre study was carried out in order to compare outcomes between cemented and uncemented total hip arthoplasties (THA). A quantitative orthopaedic outcome assessment scoring system was devised in order to relate functional outcome to a numerical score, to allow comparison between treatments and amongst centres. The system combined a radiographic score and a clinical score. Lower scores reflect better outcomes than higher scores. Consecutive cases of THA were included from two specialist practices between July 2002 and December 2005. The study included 46 THA patients (22 uncemented THA followed for 8.3 ± 4.7M and 24 cemented THA for 26.0 ± 15.7M) with a mean age of 4.4 ± 3.3 years at surgery. Multi-variable linear and logistical regression analyses were performed with adjustments for age at surgery, surgeon, follow-up time, uni- versus bilateral disease, gender and body weight. The differences between treatment groups in terms of functional scores or total scores were not significant (p > 0.05). Radiographic scores were different between treatment groups. However, these scores were usually assessed within two months of surgery and proved unreliable predictors of functional outcome (p > 0.05). The findings reflect relatively short-term follow-up, especially for the uncemented group, and do not include clinicianderived measures, such as goniometry and thigh circumference. Longer-term follow-up for the radiographic assessments is essential. A prospective study including the clinician-derived outcomes needs to be performed in order to validate the outcome instrument in its modified form.

 
  • References

  • 1 Skurla CT, Egger EL, Schwarz PD. et al. Owner assessment of the outcome of total hip arthroplasty in dogs.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000; 217: 1010-1012.
  • 2 Olmstead ML. Canine cemented total hip replacements - State-of-the-Art.. J Small Anim Pract 1995; 36: 395-399.
  • 3 Massat BJ, Vasseur PB. Clinical and radiographic results of total hip-arthroplasty in dogs - 96 cases (1986-1992).. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1994; 205: 448-454.
  • 4 Olmstead ML. Total hip replacement in the dog.. Semin Vet Med Surg (Small Anim) 1987; 2: 131-140.
  • 5 Olmstead ML, Hohn RB, Turner TM. A five-year study of 221 total hip replacements in the dog.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1983; 183: 191-194.
  • 6 Lewis RH, Jones JP. A clinical-study of canine total hip-arthroplasty.. Vet Surg 1980; 9: 20-23.
  • 7 Deyoung DJ, Deyoung BA, Aberman HA. et al. Implantation of an uncemented total hip-prosthesis - Technique and initial results of 100 arthroplasties.. Vet Surg 1992; 21: 168-177.
  • 8 Paul HA, Bargar WL. A modified technique for canine total hip-replacement.. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1987; 23: 13-18.
  • 9 Parker RB, Bloomberg MS, Bitetto W. et al. Canine total hip-arthroplasty - A clinical review of 20 cases.. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1984; 20: 97-104.
  • 10 Olmstead ML, Hohn RB. Total hip replacement in 103 clinical cases at the Ohio State University.. Kleintierpraxis 1980; 25: 407-415.
  • 11 Olmstead ML, Hohn RB, Turner TM. Technique for canine total hip replacement.. Vet Surg 1981; 10: 44-50.
  • 12 Gau M, Simonnet JH, Rocca A. et al. The treatment of chronically dislocated hips by recentered total hip-arthroplasty in the adult - A review of 43 cases.. Revue De Chirurgie Orthopedique et Reparatrice de l’ Appareil Moteur 1988; 74: 391-401.
  • 13 Montgomery RD, Milton JL, Pernell R. et al. Total hip-arthroplasty for treatment of canine hip-dysplasia.. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1992; 22: 703-719.
  • 14 Ludkowski P, Wilson-MacDonald J. Total arthroplasty in Paget’ s disease of the hip - A clinical review and review of the literature.. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; 225: 160-167.
  • 15 Furnes O, Lie SA, Espehaug B. et al. Hip disease and the prognosis of total hip replacements - A review of 53 698 primary total hip replacements reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1987-99.. JBJS (B) 2001; 83: 579-586.
  • 16 Charnley J. Total prosthetic replacement of hip. Reconstr Surg Traumatl. 1969 11. : 9ff.
  • 17 Perslow MB, Kaiser S, Grussendorf C. et al. Canine total hip replacement. A retrospective study at the clinic and policlinic for small domestic animals at the Free University Berlin between 1993-1998.. Kleintierpraxis 2002; 47: 157 -ff.
  • 18 Bergh MS, Gilley RS, Shofer FS. et al. Complications and radiographic findings following cemented total hip replacement - A retrospective evaluation of 97 dogs.. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2006; 19: 172-179.
  • 19 Charnley J. Arthroplasty of hip - A new operation.. Lancet 1961; 1: 1129-1132.
  • 20 Charnley J. Total hip replacement by low-friction arthroplasty.. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1970; 7-21.
  • 21 Charnley J. Total hip-replacement.. JAMA 1974; 230: 1025-1028.
  • 22 Haboush EJ. A new operation for arthroplasty of the hip.. Bull Hosp Joint Dis 1953; 14: 242.
  • 23 Jasty MJ, Floyd WE, Schiller AL. et al. Localized osteolysis in stable, nonseptic total hip-replacement.. JBJS-(A) 1986; 68: 912-919.
  • 24 Harris WH, Schiller AL, Scholler JM. et al. Extensive localized bone-resorption in femur following total hip-replacement.. JBJS-(A) 1976; 58: 612-618.
  • 25 Willert HG, Ludwig J, Semlitsc M. Reaction of bone to methacrylate after hip arthroplasty-longterm gross, light microscopic, and scanning electron-microscopic study.. JBJS-(A) 1974; 56: 1368-1382.
  • 26 Mendes DG, Walker PS, Figarola F. et al. Total surface hip-replacement in dog - Preliminary study of local tissue reaction.. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1974; 100: 256-264.
  • 27 Wilson JN, Scales JT. Loosening of total hip replacements with cement fixation - clinical findings and laboratory studies.. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1970; 72: 145-160.
  • 28 McLaughlin RE, Reger SI, Wang GJ. et al. Total hip replacement in dogs: technical considerations.. Canine Practice 1976; 3: 57-66.
  • 29 Smith E, Harris WH. Increasing prevalence of femoral lysis in cementless total hip-artrhoplasty.. J Arthroplasty 1995; 10: 407-412.
  • 30 Jasty M, Bragdon C, Jiranek W. et al. Etiology of osteolysis around porous-coated cementless total hip arthroplasties.. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; 111-126.
  • 31 Schmalzried TP, Jasty M, Harris WH. Periprosthetic bone loss in total hip-arthroplasty - polyethylene wear debris and the concept of the effective joint space.. JBJS-(A) 1992; 74: 849-863.
  • 32 McKellop HA, Campbell P, Park SH. et al. The origin of submicron polyethylene wear debris in total hip-arthroplasty.. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995; 3-20.
  • 33 Shanbhag AS, Jacobs JJ, Glant TT. et al. Composition and morphology wear debris in failed uncemented total hip-replacement.. JBJS-(B) 1994; 76: 60-67.
  • 34 Vanrietbergen B, Huiskes R, Weinans H. et al. The mechanism of bone remodelling and resorption around press-fitted THA systems.. J Biomech 1993; 26: 369-382.
  • 35 Willert HG, Bertram H, Buchhorn GH. Osteolysis in alloarthroplasty of the hip - the role of ultra high-molecular-weight polyethylene wear particles.. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; 95-107.
  • 36 Goldring SR, Jasty M, Roelke M. et al. Biological factors that influence the development of a bonecement membrane.. In: Fitzgerald RH, ed. Non-cemented total hip arthroplasty. New York: Raven Press, Ltd.,; 1988: 35-39.
  • 37 Gelb H, Schumacher HR, Cuckler J. et al. In vivo inflammatory response to polymethylmethacrylate particualte debris - effect of size, morphology, and surface area.. J Orthop Res 1994; 12: 83-92.
  • 38 Santavirta S, Konttinen YT, Bergroth V. et al. Aggressive granulomatous lesions associated with hip-arthroplasty - immunopathological studies.. JBJS-(A) 1990; 72A: 252-258.
  • 39 Olmstead ML. The canine cemented modular total hip prosthesis.. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1995; 31: 109-124.
  • 40 Skurla CP, James SP. Assessing the dog as a model for human total hip replacement: Analysis of 38 post mortem-retrieved canine cemented acetabular components.. J Biomed Mat Res Part B-Applied Biomaterials 2005; 73B: 260-270.
  • 41 Wooley PH, Schwarz EM. Aseptic loosening.. Gene Therapy 2004; 11: 402-407.
  • 42 Palmisano MP, Dyce J, Olmstead ML. Extraosseous cement granuloma associated with total hip replacement in 6 dogs.. Vet Surg 2003; 32: 80-90.
  • 43 Rothman RH, Cohn JC. Cemented versus cementless total hip-arthroplasty - a critical-review.. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1990; 153-169.
  • 44 Marcellin-Little DJ, Roe SC, DeYoung DJ. Development and principles of application of the canine BFX cementless hip system.. Vet Surg 2004; 294-296.
  • 45 Rashmir-Raven AM, DeYoung DJ, Abrams CF. et al. Subsidence of an uncemented canine femoral stem.. Vet Surg 1992; 21: 327-331.
  • 46 Marcellin-Little DJ, DeYoung BA, Doyens DH. et al. Canine uncemented porous-coated anatomic total hip arthroplasty: results of a long-term prospective evaluation of 50 consecutive cases.. Vet Surg 1999; 28: 10-20.
  • 47 Marcellin-Little DJ, DeYoung BA, Doyens DH. et al. Long-term fixation of 32 canine uncemented total hip prostheses.. Vet Surg 1997; 26: 254.
  • 48 Schutzer SF, GradyBenson J, Jasty M. et al. Influence of intraoperative femoral fractures and cerclage wiring on bone ingrowth into canine porous-coated femoral components.. J Arthroplasty 1995; 10: 823-829.
  • 49 Ota J, Cook JL, Lewis DD. et al. Short-term aseptic loosening of the femoral component in canine total hip replacement: Effects of cementing technique on cement mantle grade.. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 345-352.
  • 50 Edwards MR, Egger EL, Schwarz PD. Aseptic loosening of the femoral implant after cemented total hip arthroplasty in dogs: 11 cases in 10 dogs (1991-1995).. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1997; 211: 580-586.
  • 51 Skurla CP, Pluhar GE, Frankel DJ. et al. Assessing the dog as a model for human total hip replacement - Analysis of 38 canine cemented femoral components retrieved at post mortem.. JBJS - (B) 2005; 87: 120-127.
  • 52 Liska WD. Femur fractures associated with canine total hip replacement.. Vet Surg 2004; 33: 164-172.
  • 53 Liska WD, Poteet BA. Pulmonary embolism associated with canine total hip replacement.. Vet Surg 2003; 32: 178-186.
  • 54 Hunter S, Dyce J, Butkus L. et al. Acetabular cup displacement after polyethylene-cement interface failure: a complication of total hip replacement in seven dogs.. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003; 16: 99-104.
  • 55 Sebestyen P, Marcellin-Little DJ, DeYoung BA. Femoral medullary infarction secondary to canine total hip arthroplasty.. Vet Surg 2000; 29: 227-236.
  • 56 Dyce J, Wisner ER, Wang Q. et al. Evaluation of risk factors for luxation after total hip replacement in dogs.. Vet Surg 2000; 29: 524-532.
  • 57 Garino JP, Steinberg ME. Etiology of failure: An overview.. In: Garino JP, Steinberg ME, eds. Revision Total Hip Arthoplasty. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999. .
  • 58 Dyce J, Olmstead ML. Removal of infected canine cemented total hip prostheses using a femoral window technique.. Vet Surg 2002; 31: 552-560.
  • 59 Hanson SP, Peck JN, Berry CR. et al. Radiographic evaluation of the Zurich cementless total hip acetabular component.. Vet Surg 2006; 35: 550-558.
  • 60 Warnock JJ, Dyce J, Pooya H. et al. Retrospective analysis of canine miniature total hip prostheses.. Vet Surg 2003; 32: 285-291.
  • 61 DeYoung DJ, Schiller RA, DeYoung BA. Radiographic assessment of a canine uncemented porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis.. Vet Surg 1993; 22: 473-481.
  • 62 Manley PA, Vanderby R, Dogan S. et al. Ground reaction force comparison of canine cemented and cementless total hip-replacement.. Clin Biomech 1990; 5: 199-204.
  • 63 Ho P 50 cases of cementless total hip replacement in the dog.. Vet Surg. 1988 17. 38.
  • 64 Holton L, Reid J, Scott EM. et al. Development of a behaviour-based scale to measure acute pain in dogs.. Vet Rec 2004; 148: 525-531.
  • 65 McMillan FD. Maximising quality of life in ill animals.. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2003; 39: 227-234.
  • 66 Hudson JT, Slater MR. et al. Assessing repeatability and validity of a visual analogue scale questionnaire for use in assessing pain and lameness in dogs.. Am J Vet Res 2004; 65 (12) 1634-1643.
  • 67 Morton CM, Reid J. et al. Application of a scaling model to establish and validate an interval level pain scale for assessment of acute pain in dogs.. Am J Vet Res 2005; 66 (12) 2154-2166.
  • 68 Wojciechowska J, Hewson CJ. et al. Development of a discriminitive questionnaire to assess nonphysical aspects of quality of life of dogs.. Am J Vet Res 2005; 8: 1453-1460.
  • 69 Wiseman-Orr L, Scott M. et al. Validation of a structured questionnaire as an instrument to measure chronic pain in dogs on the basis of effects on health-related quality of life.. Am J Vet Res 2006; 67 (11) 1826-1836.
  • 70 Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH. et al. Validation-study of WOMAC - a health-status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drugtherapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.. J Rheumatol 1988; 15: 1833-1840.
  • 71 Angst F, Goldhahn J, Drerup S. et al. Responsiveness of six outcome assessment instruments in total shoulder arthroplasty.. Arthritis Rheum 2008; 3: 391-398.
  • 72 Angst F, John M, Pap G. et al. Comprehensive assessment of clinical outcomes and quality of life after total elbow arthroplasty.. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 53: 73-82.
  • 73 Baron G, Tubach F. Validation of a short form of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarhritis Index function subscale in hip and knee osteoarthritis.. Arthritis Rheum 2007; 57: 633-638.
  • 74 Johanson NA, Liang MH, Daltroy L. et al. American Academy of Ortho Surgeons lower limb out comes assessment instruments. Reliability, validity and sensitivity to change.. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A (05) 902-909.
  • 75 Engh CA, Glassman AH, Suthers KE. The case for porous-coated hip implants - The femoral side.. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; 261): 63-81.
  • 76 Budsberg SC, Chambers JN, VanLue SL. et al. Prospective evaluation of ground reaction forces in dogs undergoing unilateral total hip replacement.. Am J Vet Res 1996; 57: 1781-1785.
  • 77 Frankel DJ, Pluhar E, Skurla CP. et al. Radiographic evaluation of mechanically tested cemented total hip arthroplasty femoral components retrieved post mortem.. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2004; 17: 216-224.
  • 78 ElMaraghy AW, Humeniuk B, Anderson GI. et al. Femoral bone blood flow after reaming and intramedullary canal preparation - A canine study using laser Doppler flowmetry.. J Arthroplasty 1999; 14: 220-226.
  • 79 VanEnkevort BA, Markel MD, Manley PA. Alterations in bone remodeling in the femur after medullary reaming and cemented hip arthroplasty in dogs.. Am J Vet Res 1999; 60: 922-928.
  • 80 Buckwalter AE, Callaghan JJ, Liu SS. et al. Results of Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved femoral cementing techniques - A concise follow-up, at a minimum of twenty-five years, of a previous report.. JBJS-(A) 2006; 88: 1481-1485.
  • 81 El-Warrak AO, Olmstead ML, von Rechenberg B. et al. A review of aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty.. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2001; 14: 115-124.