RSS-Feed abonnieren
PDF herunterladen
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1619855
Knochenhistologie bei renaler Osteodystrophie
Bone histology in renal osteodystrophyPublikationsverlauf
Publikationsdatum:
28. Dezember 2017 (online)
Zusammenfassung
Chronische Nierenfunktionseinschränkungen führen am Knochen zu Stoffwechsel- und Strukturschäden, deren differenzierte Beurteilung vor allem durch die histologische Aufarbeitung von Knochenbioptaten möglich ist. Die internationale Klassifikation unterscheidet vier Formen der renalen Osteodystrophie (ROD). Dabei wird zwischen renalem Hyperparathyreoidismus (Osteitis fibrosa), Osteomalazie, gemischter urämischer Osteodystrophie und adynamer renaler Knochenerkrankung unterschieden. In der Arbeit werden die Methoden der Knochenentnahme und -bearbeitung, typische histologische Befunde sowie die Indikationen zur osteologischen Beckenkammbiopsie dargestellt.
Summary
Impaired renal function causes disturbances in mineral and bone metabolism which can be differenciated by bone biopsy only. The international classification separates 4 forms of renal osteodystrophy: hyperparathyroidism, osteomalacia, mixed uremic osteodystrophy and adynamic renal bone disease. Methods of bone biopsy, preparation of bone samples, characteristic findings of several forms of renal osteodystrophy and indications for bone biopsy are summarized.
-
Literatur
- 1 Arnold JS, WSS Jee. Embedding ans sectioning undecalcified bone and its application to Radioautography. Stain Technol 1954; 02: 225-239.
- 2 Atsumi K, Kushida K, Yamazaki K. et al. Risk factors for vertebral fractures in renal osteodystrophy.Am J Kidney Dis. 1999; 33: 287-293.
- 3 Burkhardt R. Präoperative Voraussetzungen zur klinischen Histologie des menschlichen Knochengewebes. Blut 1996; 14: 30-46.
- 4 De Boer IH, Gorodetskaya B, Young CY. et al. The severity of secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic renal insufficiency is GFR-dependent, race-dependent, and associated with cardiovascular disease. Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13: 2762-2769.
- 5 Delling G. Endokrine Osteopathien. Morphologie, Histomorphometrie und Differentialdiadnose. In: Büngeler W, Eder M, Lennert K, Peters G, Sandritter W, Seifert G. Hrsg. Veröffentlichungen aus der Pathologie, Heft 98. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer; 1975
- 6 Denton J, Freemont AJ, Ball J. Detection and distribution of aluminium in bone. J Clin Pathol 1974; 37: 136-142.
- 7 Duncan H, Rao S, Parfitt A. Complications of bone biopsies. In: Jee W, Parfitt A. Hrsg. Bone Histomorphometry. Paris: Societe Nouvelle de Publicatione Medicales Dentaires; 1981
- 8 Frost HM, Villanueva AR. Tetracycline staining of newly formed bone ans mineralized cartilage in vivo. Stain Technol 1960; 35: 135-138.
- 9 Goldner J. A modification of the Masson trichrome technique for routine laboratory purposes. Am J Pathol 1938; 14: 237-243.
- 10 Gomori G. Silver impregnation of paraffin sections. Am J Physiol 1937; 13: 993.
- 11 Goodman WG, Ramirez JA, Belin T. et al. Development of adynamic bone in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism after intermittnd calcitriol therapy. Kidney Int 1994; 46: 1160-1166.
- 12 Hahn M, Vogel G, Delling G. Undecalcified preparation of bone tissue: report of Technical experience and development of new methods. Virchows Arch A. Pathol A nat. Histopathol 1991; 418: 1-7.
- 13 Hamdy NA, Kanis JA, Beneton MNC. et al. Effect of alphacalcidol on natural course of renal bone disease in mild to moderate renal failure.BMJ. 1995; 310: 358-363.
- 14 Harris WH. A microscopic method of determining rates of bone growth. Nature 1960; 188: 1038-1039.
- 15 Lehmann G, Ott U, Kämmerer D. et al. Bone histomorphometry and biochemical markers of bone turnover in patients with chronic kidney diseases stages 3–5. Clin Nephrol. (im Druck).
- 16 Lehmann G, Ott U, Stein G. et al. Renal Osteodystrophy After successful Renal Transplantation: A Histomorphometric analysis in 57 Patients. Transpl proceedings 2005; 39: 3153-3158.
- 17 London GM, Matry C, Marchais SJ, Alain PG, Metivier F, de Vernejoul MC. Arterial Calcifications and bone histomorphometry in end-stage renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004; 15: 1943-1951.
- 18 Malluche HH, Sherman D, Meyer W, Massry SG. A new semiautomatic method for quantitative static and dynamic bone histology. Calcif Tissue 1982; 34: 439-448.
- 19 Malluche HH, Faugere M. Renal bone disease 1990: An unmet challenge for the nephrologist. Kidney Int 1990; 38: 193-211.
- 20 Merz WA, Schenk RK. Quantitative structural analysis of human cancellous bone. Anat (Basel) 1970; 75: 54-66.
- 21 Milch R, Rall D, Tobie J. Fluorescence of tetracyclin antibiotics in bone. J Bone Joint Surg 1958; 40A: 897-910.
- 22 Moe S, Drüecke T, Cunningham J. et al. Definition, evaluation, and classificationn of Renal osteodystrophy: a position statement from Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney Int 2006; 69: 1945-1953.
- 23 Parfitt AM, Drezner MK, Glorieux FH. et al. Bone histomorphometry, standardisation of nomenclature, symbols and units. J Bone Miner Res 1987; 02: 595-610.
- 24 Romeis B. Mikroskopische Technik, 17. Ausg. München, Wien, Baltimore: Urban und Schwarzenberg 1989
- 25 Salusky IB, Ramirez JA, Oppenheim W, Gales B, Serge GV, Goodman WG. Biochemical markers of renal osteodystrophy in pediatric patients undergoing CAPD/CCPD. Kidney Int 1994; 45: 253-258.
- 26 Sherrard DJ, Ott SM, Maloney NA. Uremic osteodystrophy: classification, cause and treatment. In: Frame B, Potts J. Hrsg. Clinical Disorders of Bone and Mineral Metabolism. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica; 1983
- 27 Von Kossa G. Ueber die im Organismus kuenstlich erzeugten Verkalkungen. Beitr Pathol Anat 1901; 29: 163-202.
- 28 Young EW, Albert JM, Satayathum S. et al. Predictors and consequences of altered mineral metabolism: The Dialysis Outcomes and Predictive Patterns Study. Kidney Int 2005; 67: 1179-1187.