Open Approaches to the Anterior Skull Base in Children: Review of the Literature

Abstract

Introduction Skull base lesions in children and adolescents are rare, and comprise only 5.6% of all skull base surgery. Anterior skull base lesions dominate, averaging slightly more than 50% of the cases. Until recently, surgery of the anterior skull base was dominated by open procedures and endoscopic skull base surgery was reserved for benign pathologies. Endoscopic skull base surgery is gradually gaining popularity. In spite of that, open skull base surgery is still considered the “gold standard” for the treatment of anterior skull base lesions, and it is the preferred approach in selected cases.

Objective This article reviews current concepts and open approaches to the anterior skull base in children in the era of endoscopic surgery.

Materials and Methods Comprehensive literature review.

Results Extensive intracranial–intradural invasion, extensive orbital invasion, encasement of the optic nerve or the internal carotid artery, lateral supraorbital dural involvement and involvement of the anterior table of the frontal sinus or lateral portion of the frontal sinus precludes endoscopic surgery, and mandates open skull base surgery. The open approaches which are used most frequently for surgical resection of anterior skull base tumors are the transfacial/transmaxillary, subcranial, and subfrontal approaches. Reconstruction of anterior skull base defects is discussed in a separate article in this supplement.

Discussion Although endoscopic skull base surgery in children is gaining popularity in developed countries, in many cases open surgery is still required. In addition, in developing countries, which accounts for more than 80% of the world's population, limited access to expensive equipment precludes the use of endoscopic surgery. Several open surgical approaches are still employed to resect anterior skull base lesions in the pediatric population. With this large armamentarium of surgical approaches, tailoring the most suitable approach to a specific lesion in regard to its nature, location, and extent is of utmost importance.

Keywords

skull base - children - open approaches - subcranial approach - reconstruction

• References

• 1 Gil Z, Patel SG, Cantu G. , et al; International Collaborative Study Group. Outcome of craniofacial surgery in children and adolescents with malignant tumors involving the skull base: an international collaborative study. Head Neck 2009; 31 (03) 308-317
• 2 Kassam A, Thomas AJ, Snyderman C. , et al. Fully endoscopic expanded endonasal approach treating skull base lesions in pediatric patients. J Neurosurg 2007; 106 (2, Suppl) 75-86
• 3 Mandonnet E, Kolb F, Tran Ba Huy P, George B. Spectrum of skull base tumors in children and adolescents: a series of 42 patients and review of the literature. Childs Nerv Syst 2008; 24 (06) 699-706
• 4 Gil Z, Constantini S, Spektor S. , et al. Skull base approaches in the pediatric population. Head Neck 2005; 27 (08) 682-689
• 5 Brockmeyer D, Gruber DP, Haller J, Shelton C, Walker ML. Pediatric skull base surgery. 2. Experience and outcomes in 55 patients. Pediatr Neurosurg 2003; 38 (01) 9-15
• 6 Stapleton AL, Tyler-Kabara EC, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH, Wang EW. Risk factors for cerebrospinal fluid leak in pediatric patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 93: 163-166
• 7 Shlomi B, Chaushu S, Gil Z, Chaushu G, Fliss DM. Effects of the subcranial approach on facial growth and development. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 136 (01) 27-32
• 8 Youssef CA, Smotherman CR, Kraemer DF, Aldana PR. Predicting the limits of the endoscopic endonasal approach in children: a radiological anatomical study. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2016; 17 (04) 510-515
• 9 Fliss DM, Zucker G, Amir A, Gatot A. The combined subcranial and midfacial degloving technique for tumor resection: report of three cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 58 (01) 106-110
• 10 Rastatter JC, Snyderman CH, Gardner PA, Alden TD, Tyler-Kabara E. Endoscopic endonasal surgery for sinonasal and skull base lesions in the pediatric population. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2015; 48 (01) 79-99
• 11 Lewark TM, Allen GC, Chowdhury K, Chan KH. Le Fort I osteotomy and skull base tumors: a pediatric experience. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 126 (08) 1004-1008
• 12 Fishman G, Fliss DM, Benjamin S. , et al. Multidisciplinary surgical approach for cerebrospinal fluid leak in children with complex head trauma. Childs Nerv Syst 2009; 25 (08) 915-923
• 13 Gao X, Zhang R, Mao Y, Wang Y. Childhood and juvenile meningiomas. Childs Nerv Syst 2009; 25 (12) 1571-1580
• 14 Hassler W, Zentner J. Pterional approach for surgical treatment of olfactory groove meningiomas. Neurosurgery 1989; 25 (06) 942-945 , discussion 945–947
• 15 Fliss DM, Abergel A, Cavel O, Margalit N, Gil Z. Combined subcranial approaches for excision of complex anterior skull base tumors. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 133 (09) 888-896
• 16 Fliss DM, Zucker G, Amir A, Gatot A, Cohen JT, Spektor S. The subcranial approach for anterior skull base tumors. Oper Tech Otolaryngol--Head Neck Surg 2000; 11: 238-253
• 17 Li Z, Li H, Wang S, Zhao J, Cao Y. Pediatric SBM. Clinical features and surgical outcomes. J Child Neurol 2016; 31 (14) 1523-1527
• 18 Turazzi S, Cristofori L, Gambin R, Bricolo A. The pterional approach for the microsurgical removal of olfactory groove meningiomas. Neurosurgery 1999; 45 (04) 821-825 , discussion 825–826