PDF herunterladen
Phlebologie 2012; 41(04): 206-213
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1621819
Leitlinie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Phlebologie
Schattauer GmbH

Leitlinie: Sklerosierungsbehandlung der Varikose

der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Phlebologie (ICD 10: I83.0, I83.1, I83.2, I83.9)5AWMF-Leitlinien-Register-Nr.: 037/015 Entwicklungsstufe: S1
E. Rabe
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms Universität Bonn;
,
H. Gerlach
2   T6, Mannheim
,
F. X. Breu
,
S. Guggenbichler
,
M. Stücker
5   Kliniken der Ruhr-Universität Bochum im St. Maria-Hilf Krankenhaus;
,
F. Pannier
6   Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie und Venerologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

15. Juni 2001

31. Dezember 2014

Publikationsdatum:
30. Dezember 2017 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Diese Leitlinie wurde im Auftrag der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Phlebologie (DGP) ausgearbeitet, vom Vorstand und im wissenschaftlichen Beirat der DGP am 15.06.2001 verabschiedet, am 26.09.2007 sowie im Mai 2012 novelliert und ersetzt die Vorversion vom November 2007. Diese Leitlinie berücksichtigt den aktuellen Stand der Literatur, aber nicht die in jedem Fall unterschiedlichen Zulassungsbestimmungen für die verschiedenen Pharmaka.

Leitlinien sind systematisch erarbeitete Empfehlungen, um den Arzt in Klinik und Praxis bei Entscheidungen über eine angemessene Versorgung des Patienten im Rahmen spezifischer klinischer Umstände zu unterstützen. Leitlinien gelten für Standardsituationen und berücksichtigen die aktuellen, zu den entspre- chenden Fragestellungen zur Verfügung stehenden wissenschaftlichen Erkenntnisse. Leitlinien bedürfen der ständigen Überprüfung und eventuell der Änderung auf dem Boden des wissenschaftlichen Erkenntnisstandes und der Praktikabilität in der täglichen Praxis. Durch die Leitlinien soll die Methodenfreiheit des Arztes nicht eingeschränkt werden. Ihre Beachtung garantiert nicht in jedem Fall den diagnostischen und therapeutischen Erfolg. Leitlinien erheben keinen Anspruch auf Vollständigkeit. Die Entscheidung über die Angemessenheit der zu ergreifenden Maßnahmen trifft der Arzt unter Berücksichtigung der in-dividuellen Problematik.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Rabe E, Pannier F, Gerlach H, Breu FX, Guggenbichler S, Wollmann JC. Leitlinie Sklerosierungsbehandlung der Varikose. Phlebologie 2008; 37: 27-34.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Drake LA, Dinehart SM, Goltz RW. et al. Guidelines of care for sclerotherapy treatment of varicose and teleangiectatic leg veins. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996; 34: 523-528.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Rabe E, Pannier-Fischer F, Gerlach H. et al. Guidelines for sclerotherapy of varicose veins. Dermatol Surg 2004; 30: 687-693.
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Einarsson E, Eklöf B, Neglén P. Sclerotherapy or Surgery as Treatment for Varicose Veins: A Prospective Randomized Study. Phlebology 1993; 8: 22-26.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Malouf GM. Ambulatory Venous Surgery versus Sclerotherapy. Hawaii Med J 2000; 59: 248-249.
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Bullens-Goessens YIJM, Mentink LF. et al. Ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy of the insufficient short saphenous vein. Phlebologie 2004; 33: 89-91.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Schultz-Ehrenburg U, Tourbier H. Doppler-kontrollierte Verödungsbehandlung der Vena saphena magna. Phlebol u Proktol 1984; 13: 117-122.
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Vin F. Principes de la Sclérothéraphie des Troncs Saphènes Internes. Phlebologie 1997; 50: 229-234.
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Wright D, Gobin JP, Bradbury AW. et al. Varisolve European Phase III Investigators Group. Varisolve® polidocanol microfoam compared with surgery or sclerotherapy in the management of varicose veins in the presence of trunk vein incompetence: European randomized controlled trial. Phlebology 2006; 21: 180-190.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Cavezzi A, Frullini A, Ricci S, Tessari L. Treatment of varicose veins by foam sclerotherapy: Two clinical series. Phlebology 2002; 17: 13-18.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hamel-Desnos C, Desnos P, Wollmann JC. et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of Polidocanol in the form of foam compared with liquid form in sclero therapy of the long saphenous vein: Initial results. Dermatol Surg 2003; 29: 1170-1175.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Hamel-Desnos C, Ouvry P, Benigni JP. et al. Comparison of 1% and 3% Polidocanol Foam in Ultrasound Guided Sclerotherapy of the Great Saphenous Vein: A Randomised, Double-Blind Trial with 2 Year-Follow-up. “The 3/1 Study" Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007; 34: 723-729.
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Rabe E, Otto J, Schliephake D, Pannier F. Efficacy and Safety of Great Saphenous Vein Sclerotherapy Using Standardised Polidocanol Foam (ESAF): A Randomised Controlled Multicentre Clinical Trial. Eur J Endovasc Vasc Surg 2008; 35: 2238-2245.
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Breu FX, Guggenbichler Wollmann JC. 2nd European Consensus Meeting on Foam Sclerotherapy, 28-30 April 2006, Tegernsee, Germany. Vasa 2008; 37 (Suppl. 71) 1-32.
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Kreussler Fachinformationen Aethoxysklerol 0,25% / 0,5% / 1% / 2% /3% Stand Oktober. 2009. Chemische Fabrik Kreussler & Co GmbH
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Guex JJ, Allaert F-A, Gillet J-L. Immediate and midterm complications of sclerotherapy: Report of a prospective multicenter registry of 12,173 sclerotherapy sessions. Dermatol Surg 2005; 31: 123-128.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Munavalli GS, Weiss RA. Complications of sclerotherapy. Semin Cutan Med Surg 2007; 26: 22-28.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Weiss RA, Weiss MA. Incidence of Side Effects in the Treatment of Telangiectasias by Compression Sclerotherapy: Hypertonics Saline vs. Polidocanol. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1990; 16: 800-804.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Gillet JL, Guedes JM, Guex JJ. et al. Side effects amd complications of foam sclerotherapy of the great and small saphenous veins: a controlled multicentre prospective study including 1025 patients. Phlebology 2009; 24: 131-138.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Feied CF, Jackson JJ, Bren TS. et al. Allergic Reactions to Polidocanol for Vein Sclerosis. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1994; 20: 466-468.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Pradalier A, Vincent D, Hentschel V. et al. Allergie aux sclérosants des varices. Rev Fr Allergol 1995; 35: 440-443.
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Morrison N, Cavezzi A, Bergan J, Partsch H. Regarding „stroke after varicose vein foam injection sclerotherapy“. J Vasc Surg 2006; 44: 224-225.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Passariello F. Sclerosing foam and patent foramen ovale. The final report. In: Word Congress of the International Union of Phlebology; 2007 Jun 18-20; Kyoto, Japan. Int Angiol 2007; 26: 87
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Wagdi P. Migräne und offenes Foramen Ovale: nur ein vorübergehender Hoffnungsschimmer?. Kardiovasc Med 2006; 9: 32-36.
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Forlee MV, Grouden M, Moore DJ. et al. Stroke after varicose vein foam injection sclerotherapy. J Vasc Surg 2006; 43: 162-164.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Breu FX, Marshall M. Sklerotherapie mit Polidocanol in einer angiologisch-phlebologischen Spezialpraxis. Prospektive und retrospektive Erhebung über Ergebnisse und Komplikationen. Phlebologie 2003; 32: 76-80.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Myers KA, Jolley D. Factors Affecting the Risk of Deep Venous Occlusion after Ultrasound-guided Sclerotherapy for Varicose Vein. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008; 36: 602-605.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Hamel-Desnos C, Ouvry P, Desnos P. et al. Sclérothérapie et thrombophilie: Démarche pour un consensus dans la sclérothérapie chez les thrombophiles, Phlébologie. 2003; 56: 165-169.
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Hanisch F, Müller T, Krivocuca M, Winterholler M. Stroke following variceal sclerotherapy. Eur J Med Res 2004; 9: 282-284.
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Busch RG, Derrick M, Manjoney D. Major neurological events following foam sclerotherapy. Phlebology 2008; 23: 189-192.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Yamaki T, Nozaki M, Sakurai H. et al. Multiple Small-Dose Injections can reduce the passage of sclerosant foam into deep veins during foam sclerotherapy for varicose veins. Eur J Endovasc Surg 2008. online Oct. 2008
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Goldman MP, Sadick NS, Weiss RA. Cutaneous Necrosis, Telangiectatic Matting and Hyperpigmentation following Sclerotherapy. Dermatol Surg 1995; 21: 19-29.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Bergan JJ, Weiss RA, Goldman MP. Extensive tissue necrosis following high concentration sclerotherapy for varicose veins. Dermatol Surg 2000; 26: 535-542.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Geukens J, Rabe E, Bieber T. Embolia cutis medicamentosa of the foot after sclerotherapy. Eur J Dermatol 1999; 9: 132-133.
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Oesch A, Stirnemann P, Mahler F. The Acute Ischemic Syndrome of the Foot after Sclerotherapy of Varicose Veins. Schweiz. Med. Wochenschr 1984; 114: 1155-1158.
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Weiss RA, Sadick NS, Goldman MP, Weiss MA. Postsclerotherapy compression: controlled comparative study of duration of compression and its effects on clinical outcome. Dermatol Surg 1999; 25: 105-108.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Van der Plas JPL, Lambers JC, van Wersch JW, Koehler PJ. Reversible ischaemic neurological deficit after sclerotherapy of varicose veins. Lancet 1994; 343: 428
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Zipper SG. Nervus peronäus-Schaden nach Varizensklerosierung mit Aethoxysklerol. Versicherungsmedizin 2000; 4: 185-187.
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Grondin L, Young R, Wouters L. Sclérothérapie ècho-guidée et sécurité: Comparison des techniques. Phlebologie 1997; 50 (02) 241-245.
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Guex JJ. Ultrasound Guided Sclerotherapy (USGS) for Perforating Veins. Hawaii Med J 2000; 59 (06) 261-262.
    Google Scholar
  • 41 Schadeck M, Allaert FA. Résultats à long terme de la Sclérothérapie des Saphènes internes. Phlebologie 1997; 50 (02) 257-262.
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Wollmann JC. The history of sclerosing foams. Dermatol Surg 2004; 30: 694-703.
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Sadoun S, Benigni JP, Sica M. Étude prospective de l'efficacité de la mousse de sclérosant dans le traitement des varices tronculaires des membres inférieurs. Phlébologie 2002; 55: 259-262.
    Google Scholar
  • 44 Alos J, Carreno P, Lopez JA. et al. Efficacy and safety of sclerotherapy using Polidocanol foam: A controlled clinical trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006; 31: 101-107.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Ceulen RPM, Bullens-Goessens YIJM, Pi-Van De Venne SJA. Outcomes and side effects of duplexguided sclerotherapy in the treatment of great saphenous veins with 1% versus 3% Polidocanol foam: Results of a randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. Dermatol Surg 2007; 33: 276-281.
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Kahle B, Leng K. Efficacy of sclerotherapy in varicose veins – a prospective, blinded placebocontrolled study. Dermatol Surg 2004; 30: 723-728.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Rao J, Wildemore JK, Goldmann MP. Double-blind prospective comparative trial between foamed and liquid Polidocanol and Natrium Tetradecyl Sulfate in the treatment of varicose and telangiectatic leg veins. Dermatol Surg 2005; 31 (06) 631-635.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Yamaki T, Nozaki M, Iwasaka S. Comparative study of duplex-guided foam sclerotherapy and duplexguided liquid sclerotherapy for the treatment of superficial venous insufficiency. Dermatol Surg 2004; 30: 718-722.
    Google Scholar
  • 49 Ouvry P, Allaert FA, Desnos P, Hamel-Desnos C. Efficacy of Polidocanol Foam versus Liquid in Sclerotherapy of the Great Saphenous Vein: A Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial with a 2-year Followup. Eur J Vasc Surg 2008; 36: 366-370.
    Google Scholar
  • 50 Kern P, Ramelet AA, Wütschert R. et al. Single-blind, randomized study comparing Chromated Glycerin, Polidocanol solution and Polidocanol foam for treatment of telangiectatic leg veins. Dermatol Surg 2004; 30: 367-372.
    Google Scholar
  • 51 McCoy S, Evans A, Spurrier N. Sclerotherapy for Leg Telangiectasia – A Blinded Comparative Trial of Polidocanol and Hypertonic Saline. Dermatol Surg 1999; 25: 381-386.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Norris MJ, Carlin MC, Ratz JL. Treatment of essential telangiectasia: Effects of increasing concentrations of polidocanol. J Am Acad of Dermatol 1989; 20: 643-649.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Rabe E, Schliephake D, Otto J, Breu F X, Pannier F. Sclerotherapy of telangiectases and reticular veins: a double-blind, randomized, comparative clinical trial of polidocanol, sodium tetradecyl sulphate and isotonic saline (EASI study). Phlebology 2010; 25: 124-131.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Rasmussen LH. et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation,radiofrequency ablation, foam sclerotherapy and surgicalstripping for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg 2011; 98: 1079-1087.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Ceulen RPM, Jagtmann EA, Sommer A, Teule GJJ, Schurink GWH, Kemerink GJ. Blocking the saphenafemoral junction during ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy – assessment of a presumed safety-measure procedure. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2010; 40: 772-776.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Blaise S, Bosson JL, Diamand JM. Ultrasound guided sclerotherapy of the great saphenous vein with 1 % vs 3 % Polidocanol foam: a multicentre double-blind randomised trial with 3 year follow up. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2010; 39
    Google Scholar
  • 57 Chapman-Smith P, Browne A. Prospective five year study of ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy in the treatment of great saphenous vein reflux. Phlebology 2009; 24: 183-188.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Kern P, Ramelet AA, Wütschert R, Hayoz D. Compression after sclerotherapy for telangiectasias and reticular leg veins. A randomized controlled study. J Vas Surg 2007; 45: 1212-1216.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Goldman PM, Beaudoing D, Marley W. et al. Compression in the Treatment of Leg Teleangiectasia: A Preliminary Report. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1990; 16: 322-325.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Stanley PRW, Bickerton DR, Campbell WB. Injection sclerotherapy for varicose veins – a comparison of materials for applying local compression. Phlebology 1991; 6: 37-39.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Brodersen JP. Catheter-assisted vein sclerotherapy: A new approach for sclerotherapy of the greater saphenous vein with a double-lumen balloon catheter. Dermatol Surg 2007; 33: 469-475.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Wildenhues B. Catheter-assisted foam sclerotherapy: A new minimally invasive method fort he treatment of trunk varicosis of the long and short saphenous veins. Phlebologie 2005; 34: 165-170.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Hahn M, Schulz T, Jünger M. Sonographically guided, transcatheter foam sclerotherapy of the great saphenous vein. Medical and oeconomic aspects. Phlebologie 2007; 36: 309-312.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Bidewai A, Beresford T, Dialynas M. et al. Balloon control of the saphenofemoral junction during foam sclerotherapy : proposed innovation. J Vasc Surg 2007; 46: 145-147.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Kölbel T, Hinchliffe RJ, Lindbal B. Catheter-directed foam sclerotherapy of axial saphenous reflux. Early results. Phlebology 2007; 22: 219-222.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Stücker M, Reich S, Hermes N. et al. Safety and efficiency of perilesional sclerotherapy in leg ulcer patients with postthrombotic syndrome and/or oral anticoagulation with Phenprocoumon. JDDG 2006; 4: 734-738.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 67 De Waard MM, Der Kinderen DJ. Duplex ultrasonography-guided foam sclerotherapy of incompetent perforator veins in a patient with bilateral venous leg ulcers. Dermatol Surg 2005; 31: 580-583.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Hertzman PA, Owens R. Rapid healing of chronic venous ulcers following ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy. Phlebology 2007; 22: 34-39.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Pang KH, Bate GR, Darvall KAL, Adam DJ, Bradbury AW. Healing and recurrence rates following ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy of superficial venous reflux in patients with chronic venous ulceration. Eur J Vasc endovasc Surg 2010; 40: 790-795.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Yamaki T, Nozaki M, Sakurai H. et al. Prospective randomized efficacy of ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy compared with ultrasound-guided liquid sclerotherapy in the treatment of symptomatic venous malformations. J Vasc Surg 2008; 47: 578-584.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar