Download PDF
Nuklearmedizin 2006; 45(05): 219-222
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1625223
Original Articles
Schattauer GmbH

Combined 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging of the head and neck

An approach to metal artifact correctionKombinierte 18F-FDG-PET/CTBildgebung im HNO-BereichEin Ansatz zur Korrektur von Metallartefakten
K. P. Schäfers
1   Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster
,
R. Raupach
2   Siemens Medical Solutions, Computed Tomography, Forchheim
,
T. Beyer
3   University Hospital Essen, Germany
4   Timaq medical imaging Inc, Zurich, Switzerland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 28 April 2006

in revised form: 27 June 2006

Publication Date:
10 January 2018 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Summary:

PET/CT imaging is particularly promising for head/neck malignancies, but dental implants lead to biased CT attenuation and PET activity values following CT-based attenuation correction (CT-AC). Objective: Here, we implement a metal artifact correction procedure (MAR) as part of the CT-AC for PET/CT imaging. Results: Phantom studies indicate a maximum quantitative bias in CT and PET of 1000 HU and 30 %, which is reduced to 230 HU and 6 %, respectively following MAR. These results were verified in selected patients. Conclusion: Artifacts and biases from dental implants can be reduced in PET/CT imaging by applying a simple MAR as part of the CT-AC.

Zusammenfassung:

Die PET/CT ist eine vielversprechende Bildgebungsmethode für onkologische Erkrankungen im HNO-Bereich. Allerdings führen Metallimplantate über eine CT-basierte Schwächungskorrektur (CT-AC) zu Bildartefakten und verfälschten PET-Aktivitätswerten. Ziel: Ein Korrekturalgorithmus für Metallartefakte (MAR) wurde als Teil der CT-AC implementiert. Ergebnisse: Phantomstudien zeigen einen maximalen Fehler der CT und PET Werte von 1000 HU bzw. 30%. Diese Fehler können durch MAR auf 230 HU bzw. 6% reduziert werden. Diese Ergebnisse wurden in ausgewählten Patienten verifiziert. Schlussfolgerung: In der PET/CT können Artefakte und quantitative Fehler durch Zahnimplantate über eine einfache Metallartefaktkorrektur als Teil der CT-AC reduziert werden.

Key words:

Head and neck - metal artifacts - PET/CT imaging

Schlüsselwörter:

HNO - Metallartefakte - PET/CT Bildgebung
 

  • References

  • 1 Antoch G, Freudenberg LS, Egelhof T. et al. Focal tracer uptake: A potential artifact in contrast-enhanced dual-modality PET/CT scans. J Nucl Med 2002; 43: 1339-42.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Beyer T, Bockisch A, Kuhl H. et al. Whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT in the presence of truncation artifacts. J Nucl Med 2006; 47: 91-9.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Beyer T, Tellmann L, Nickel I. et al. On the use of positioning aids to reduce mis-registration in the head/neck region of whole-body PET/CT studies. J Nucl Med 2005; 46: 596-602.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Beyer T, Townsend DW, Brun T. et al. A combined PET/CT tomograph for clinical oncology. J Nucl Med 2000; 41: 1369-79.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bujenovic S, Mannting F, Chakrabarti R. et al. Artifactual 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose localization surrounding metallic objects in a PET/CT scanner using CT-based attenuation correction. Mol Imag Biol 2003; 5: 20-2.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 DiFilippo FP, Brunken RC. Do implanted pacemakers leads and ICD leads cause metal-related artifact in caridac PET/CT?. J Nucl Med 2005; 46: 436-43.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Goerres G, Schmid D, Eyrich G. Do hardware artefacts influence the performance of head and neck PET scans in patients with oral cavity squamous cell cancer?. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 2003; 32: 365-71.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Goerres GW, von Schulthess GK, Hany TF. Positron emission tomography and PET CT of the head and neck: FDG uptake in normal anatomy, in benign lesions, and in changes resulting from treatment. Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179: 1337-43.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Goerres GW, Ziegler SI, Burger C. et al. Artifacts at PET and PET/CT caused by metallic hip prosthetic material. Radiology 2003; 226: 577-84.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kamel EM, Burger C, Buck A. et al. Impact of metallic dental implants on CT-based attenuation correction in a combined PET/CT scanner. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 724-8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Kinahan P, Hasegawa B, Beyer T. X-ray based attenuation correction for PET/CT scanners. Semin Nucl Med 2003; 33: 166-79.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Mahnken AH, Raupach R, Wildberger JE. et al. A new algorithm for metal artifact reduction in computed tomography. In vitro and in vivo evaluation after total hip replacement. Invest Radiol 2003; 38: 769-75.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Osman MM, Cohade C, Fishman EK. et al. Clinically significant incedental findings on the unenhanced CT portion of PET/CT studies: frequency in 250 patients. J Nucl Med 2005; 46: 1352-5.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar