Methods of Information in Medicine, Inhaltsverzeichnis Methods Inf Med 2010; 49(03): 269-270DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1625339 Special Topic – Editorial Schattauer GmbH Health Informatics Meets eHealth E. Ammenwerth 1 UMIT – University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tyrol, Austria , G. Schreier 2 AIT – Austrian Institute of Technology, Graz, Austria , D. Hayn 2 AIT – Austrian Institute of Technology, Graz, Austria › Institutsangaben Artikel empfehlen Abstract Artikel einzeln kaufen Volltext Referenzen References 1 Haux R. Individualization, globalization and health – about sustainable information technologies and the aim of medical informatics. Int J Med Inform 2006; 75 (12) 795-808. 2 Kim GR, Lehmann CU. In search of dialogue and discourse in applied clinical informatics. ACI 2009; 0 (01) 1-9. doi: 10.4338/ACI09-10-0002. http://www.aci-journal.org. 3 Ammenwerth E, de Keizer N. A viewpoint on Evidence-based Health Informatics, based on a pilot survey on evaluation studies in health care informatics. JAMIA 2007; 14 (03) 368-371. 4 Kuhn KA, Giuse DA, Lapão L, Wurst SH. Expanding the scope of health information systems – from hospitals to regional networks, to national infrastructures, and beyond. Methods Inf Med 2007; 46 (04) 500-502. 5 Eysenbach G. What is e-health?. J Med Internet Res 2001; 3 (02) e20. http://www.jmir.org/2001/2/e20. 6 Sood S, Mbarika V, Jugoo S, Dookhy R, Doarn CR, Prakash N, Merrell RC. What is telemedicine? A collection of 104 peer-reviewed perspectives and theoretical underpinnings. J Telemed J E Health 2007; 13 (05) 573-590. 7 Ruland CM, Brynhi H, Andersen R, Bryhni T. Developing a shared electronic health record for patients and clinicians. In: Andersen SK, Klein MCA, Schluz S, Aarts J, Mazzoleni MC. (eds). eHealth beyond the horizon – get IT there. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008; 136: 57-62. 8 Arnrich B, Mayora O, Bardram J, Tröster G. Pervasive Healthcare. Paving the way for a pervasive, user-centered and preventive healthcare model. Methods Inf Med 2010; 49: 67-73. 9 Stroetmann KA, Jones T, Dobrev A, Stroetmann VN. eHealth is worth it. The economic benefits of implemented eHealth solutions at ten European sites. European Commission; 2006 http://www.ehealth-impact.org/download/documents/ehealthimpactsept2006.pdf. 10 Iakovidis I, Wilson P, Healy JC. The road ahead. In: Iakovidis I, Wilson P, Healy JC. (eds). E-Health: Current Situation and Examples of Implemented and Beneficial E-Health Applications. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004; 100: 246-249. 11 Lintonen TP, Konu AI, Seedhouse D. Information technology in health promotion. Health Educ Res 2008; 23 (03) 560-566. Epub 2007 Feb 13. 12 Kuhn KA, Giuse DA. From hospital information systems to health information systems. Problems, challenges, perspectives. Methods Inf Med 2001; 40 (04) 275-287. 13 Koch S. Ubiquitous care in aging societies – a social challenge. In: Blobel B, Pharow P, Nerlich M. (eds). eHealth: Combining Health Telematics, Telemedicine, Biomedical Engineering and Bioinformatics to the Edge. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008; 134: 89-95. 14 The eHealth-conference series, organized by the Working Group “Medical Informatics” of the Austrian Computer Society (OCG) and the Austrian Society for Biomedical Technologies (ÖGBMT). www.eHealth2007.at, www.eHealth2008.at, www.eHealth2009.at, www.eHealth2010.at. 15 Rinner C, Janzek-Hawlat S, Sibinovic S, Duftschmid G. Semantic validation of standard-based electronic health record documents with W3C XML Schema. Methods Inf Med 2010; 49: 271-280. 16 Namli T, Dogac A. Testing conformance and inter-operability of eHealth applications. Methods Inf Med 2010; 49: 281-289. 17 Pfeifer B, Hanser F, Seger M, Netzer M, Osl M, Modre-Osprian R, Schreier G, Wurz M, Baumgartner C. An epidemiologic modeling and data integration framework. Methods Inf Med 2010; 49: 290-296.
