Nervenheilkunde 2004; 23(05): 274-278
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1626377
Original- und Übersichtsarbeiten - Original and Review Articles
Schattauer GmbH

Mechanismen neuropathischer Schmerzen am Beispiel des Phantomschmerzes

Übertragbarkeit tierexperimenteller Daten auf den MenschenMechanisms of neuropathic pain: Comparison of data from experimental models of neuropathic pain and patients with phantom limb pain
K. Wiech
1   Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, London
,
R.-T. Kiefer
2   Abteilung für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
31. Januar 2018 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Die aktuellen Vorstellungen über pathophysiologische Mechanismen neuropathischer Schmerzen basieren wesentlich auf experimentellen Untersuchungen am Tier. Am Beispiel des Phantomschmerzes wird dargestellt, welche tierexperimentellen Befunde zur Erklärung neuropathischer Schmerzen beim Menschen herangezogen werden können. Neben pathologischen Prozessen im Stumpfbereich (z.B. Neurombildungen) und Fehlregulationen im sympathischen Nervensystem wurden vornehmlich schmerzassoziierte Auffälligkeiten in supraspinalen Strukturen untersucht. Untersuchungen mit Verfahren funktioneller Bildgebung zeigen, dass Phantomschmerzen mit Veränderungen der funktionellen Organisation im primären sensorischen und motorischen Kortex in Zusammenhang stehen, die den tierexperimentellen Befunden entsprechen.

Summary

Today, most insights into the pathophysiology underlying neuropathic pain come from animal studies. Based on the example of phantom limb pain, analogies between experimental evidence from animal studies and pain research in humans are discussed. In addition to pathological processes in the residual limb (e.g. formation of neuroma), and dysregulation in the sympathetic nervous system, pain associated alterations in supraspinal structures have been investigated. Studies using functional neuroimaging techniques showed that phantom limb pain is related to changes in the functional organization of the primary somatosensory and motor cortex reflecting cortical reorganization observed in animals.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Baron R, Jänig W. Schmerzsyndrome mit kausaler Beteiligung des Sympathikus. Anaesthesist 1998; 47: 4-23.
  • 2 Baron R, Maier C. Phantom limb pain: Are cutaneous nociceptors and spinothalamic neurons involved in the signaling and maintenance of spontaneous and touch-evoked pain? A case report. Pain 1995; 60: 223-8.
  • 3 Birbaumer N, Lutzenberger W, Montoya P, Larbig W, Unertl K, Toepfner S, Grodd W, Taub E, Flor H. Effects of regional anesthesia on phantom limb pain are mirrored in changes in cortical reorganization. J Neurosci 1997; 17: 5503-8.
  • 4 Blumberg H, Jänig W. Discharge pattern of afferent fibers from neuroma. Pain 1984; 20: 335-53.
  • 5 Churchill JD, Arnold LL, Garraghty PE. Somatotopic reorganization in the brainstem and thalamus following peripheral nerve injury in adult primates. Brain Res 2001; 910 (1-2): 142-52.
  • 6 Davis KD, Kwan CL, Crawley AP, Mikulis DJ. Functional MRI study of thalamic and cortical activations evoked by cutaneous heat, cold, and tactile stimuli. J Neurophysiol 1998; 80: 1533-46.
  • 7 Devor M, Wall PD, Catalan N. Systemic lidocaine silences ectopic neuroma and DRG discharge without blocking nerve conduction. Pain 1992; 48: 261-8.
  • 8 Flor H, Elbert T, Knecht S, Wienbruch C, Pantev C, Birbaumer N, Larbig W, Taub E. Phantom-limb pain as a perceptual correlate of cortical reorganization following arm amputation. Nature 1995; 375: 482-4.
  • 9 Florence SL, Garraghty PE, Wall JT, Kaas JH. Sensory afferent projections and area 3b somatotopy following median nerve cut and repair in macaque monkeys. Cereb Cortex 1994; 04 (04) 391-407.
  • 10 Fried K, Govrin-Lippmann R, Rosenthal F, Ellisman MH, Devor M. Ultrastructure of afferent axon endings in a neuroma. J Neurocytol 1991; 20 (08) 682-701.
  • 11 Gorecki J, Hirayama T, Dostrovsky JO, Tasker RR, Lenz FA. Thalamic stimulation and recording in patients with deafferentation and central pain. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1987; 52: 219-26.
  • 12 Jänig W, Levine JD, Michaelis M. Interactions of sympathetic and primary afferent neurons following nerve injury and tissue trauma. In: Kumazawa T, Kruger L, Mizamura K. (Hrsg.). Progress in Brain Research. vol. 113. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 1996
  • 13 Karl A, Birbaumer N, Lutzenberger W, Cohen LG, Flor H. Reorganization of motor and somatosensory cortex in upper extremity amputees with phantom limb pain. J Neurosci 2001; 21 (10) 3609-18.
  • 14 Katz J. Phantom limb pain. Lancet 1997; 350: 1338-9.
  • 15 Katz J. Psychophysiological contributes to phantom limbs. Can J Psychiatry 1992; 37: 282-98.
  • 16 Kew JJ, Halligan PW, Marshall JC, Passingham RE, Rothwell JC, Ridding MC, Marsden CD, Brooks DJ. Abnormal access of axial vibrotactile input to deafferented somatosensory cortex in human upper limb amputees. J Neurophysiol 1997; 77: 2753-64.
  • 17 Kew JJ, Ridding MC, Rothwell JC, Passingham RE, Leigh PN, Sooriakumaran S, Frackowiak RSJ, Brooks DJ. Reorganization of cortical blood flow and transcranial magnetic stimulation maps in human subjects after upper limb amputation. J Neurophysiol 1994; 72: 2517-24.
  • 18 Lotze M, Flor H, Grodd W, Larbig W, Birbaumer N. Phantom movements and pain: an fMRI study in upper limb amputees. Brain 2001; 124: 101-10.
  • 19 Lotze M, Grodd W, Birbaumer N, Erb M, Huse E, Flor H. Does use of a myoelectric prothesis prevent cortical reorganization and phantom limb pain? Nat Neurosci. 1999; 02: 501-2.
  • 20 Marsland AR, Weekes JWN, Atkinson RL, Leong MG. Phantom limb pain: a case for betablockers?. Pain 1982; 12 (03) 295-7.
  • 21 Melzack R. Phantom limb and the concept of a neuromatrix. Trends Neurosci 1990; 13: 88-92.
  • 22 Merzenich MM, Kaas JH, Wall JP, Sur RJ, Nelson RJ, Felleman DJ. Progression of change following median nerve section in the cortical representation of the hand in areas 3b and I in adult owl and squirrel monkeys. Neurosci 1983; 10: 639-65.
  • 23 Montoya P, Larbig W, Grulke N, Flor H, Taub E, Birbaumer N. The relationship of phantom limb pain to other phantom limb phenomena in upper extremity amputees. Pain 1997; 72: 87-93.
  • 24 Montoya P, Ritter K, Huse E, Larbig W, Braun C, Töpfner S, Lutzenberger W, Grodd W, Flor H, Birbaumer N. The cortical somatotopic map and phantom phenomena in subjects with congenital limb atrophy and traumatic amputees with phantom limb pain. Eur J Neurosci 1998; 10 (03) 1095-102.
  • 25 Nyström B, Hagbarth K-E. Microelectrode recordings from transected nerves in amputees with phantom limb pain. Neurosci Lett 1981; 27: 211-6.
  • 26 Pons T, Garraghty PE, Ommaya AK, Kaas J, Taub E, Mishkin M. Massive cortical reorganization after sensory deafferentation in adult macaques. Science 1991; 252: 1857-60.
  • 27 Sandkühler J. Neurobiology of spinal nociception: new concepts. In: Carli G, Zimmermann M. (Hrsg.). Progress in Brain Research, Vol. 110 Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 1996: 207-24.
  • 28 Scadding JW. Development of ongoing activity, mechanosensitivity, and adrenaline sensitivity in severed peripheral nerve axons. Exp Neurol 1981; 73 (02) 345-64.
  • 29 Sherman RA, Sherman CJ, Bruno GM. Psychological factors influencing phantom limb pain: an analysis of literature. Pain 1987; 28: 285-95.
  • 30 Sherman RA. Phantom limb pain: Mechanismbased management. Clinics Pediatric Med Surg 1994; 11: 85-106.
  • 31 Sherman RA. Phantom pain. New York: Plenum Press; 1997
  • 32 Wassef MR. Phantom pain with probable reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Reg Anesth 1997; 22 (03) 287-90.
  • 33 Woolf CJ, Mannion RJ. Neuropathic pain: aetiology, symptoms, mechanisms, and management. Lancet 1999; 353: 1959-64.
  • 34 Woolf CJ, Salter MW. Neuronal plasticity: increasing the gain in pain. Science 2000; 288 (5472) 1765-9.
  • 35 Wüllenweber R. Ergebnisse der chirurgischen Behandlung des Phantomschmerzes Amputierter. Der Chirurg 1958; 03: 115-8.
  • 36 Yang TT, Gallen C, Schwartz B, Bloom FE, Ramachandran VS. Sensory maps in the human brain. Nature 1994; 368: 592-3.