Initial Management of Traumatic Digit Amputations: A Retrospective Study of Functional Outcomes

Abstract

Background Traumatic amputation of one or more digits can have a serious detrimental effect on social and economic standings which can be mitigated by successful replantation. Little has been recorded on preoperative management before replantation and how this affects the outcomes of the replanted digit.

Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted and data collected over an 18-month period. Three protocols for preoperative management were examined: minimal (basic wound management), complete Buncke (anticoagulation, dry dressing on amputate placed on indirect ice and absence of a digital block), and incomplete (any two or three criteria from complete Buncke in addition to the minimal) protocols. Data was collected on survival rate, secondary operations, and complication rate. Function was defined by sensation, range of movement, and strength.

Results Seventy four of 177 digits were replanted with an overall survival rate of 86.5%. The rates for minimal, incomplete, and complete protocols were 95%, 87%, and 91%, respectively, and not significantly different. The complication rate was significantly different between the complete (20%) and minimal (60%) protocols (p = 0.0484). Differences in sensation and grip strength were statistically significant between protocols (p = 0.0465 and p = 0.0430, respectively). Anticoagulation, no digital block and dry gauze all showed reduced complication rates in comparison to their counterparts.

Conclusions The Buncke protocol, which includes anticoagulation, no digital block, and dry gauze, was found to significantly reduce the complication rate which suggests that it prevents compromise of tissue integrity. Significant differences were found between protocols for sensation and grip strength. A higher-powered study is needed to investigate the effects of preoperative management on complication rates and functional outcomes.

Keywords

digit replantation - preoperative management - hand surgery - Buncke protocol

• References

• 1 Komatsu S, Tamai S. Successful replantation of a completely cut-off thumb: case report. Plast Reconstr Surg 1968; 42 (04) 374-377
• 2 Sebastin SJ, Chung KC. A systematic review of the outcomes of replantation of distal digital amputation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (03) 723-737
• 3 Yu H, Wei L, Liang B, Hou S, Wang J, Yang Y. Nonsurgical factors of digital replantation and survival rate: a metaanalysis. Indian J Orthop 2015; 49 (03) 265-271
• 4 Medling BD, Bueno Jr RA, Russell RC, Neumeister MW. Replantation outcomes. Clin Plast Surg 2007; 34 (02) 177-185 , vii–viii
• 5 Chung KC, Alderman AK. Replantation of the upper extremity: indications and outcomes. J Am Soc Surg Hand. 2002; 2 (02) 78-93
• 6 Ma Z, Guo F, Qi J, Xiang W, Zhang J. Effects of non-surgical factors on digital replantation survival rate: a meta-analysis. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2016; 41 (02) 157-163
• 7 Soucacos PN. Indications and selection for digital amputation and replantation. J Hand Surg [Br] 2001; 26 (06) 572-581
• 8 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Fractures (complex): assessment and management. Manchester and London, UK; February 2016. NICE guideline (NG37)
• 9 Win TS, Henderson J. Management of traumatic amputations of the upper limb. Br Med J 2014; 348: g255
• 10 Lloyd MS, Teo TC, Pickford MA, Arnstein PM. Preoperative management of the amputated limb. Emerg Med J 2005; 22 (07) 478-480
• 11 American College of Surgeons. Advanced Trauma Life Support Guidelines. 8th ed. Chicago, IL, USA: J Trauma Acute care Surg; 2011
• 12 Azzopardi EA, Whitaker IS, Laing H. Perceptions of correct preoperative storage and transfer of amputated digits: a national survey of referring emergency departments. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008; 61 (11) 1418-1419
• 13 Oomman A, Tickunas T, Javed M. , et al. Changes in perceptions regarding correct preoperative storage and transfer of amputated digits: a 5-year follow-up. Microsurgery 2014; 34 (01) 76-77
• 14 Tamai S. Twenty years' experience of limb replantation–review of 293 upper extremity replants. J Hand Surg Am 1982; 7 (06) 549-556
• 15 Flatt AE. Our thumbs. Proc Bayl Univ Med Cent 2002; 15 (04) 380-387
• 16 Breahna A, Siddiqui A, Fitzgerald O'Connor E, Iwuagwu FC. Replantation of digits: a review of predictive factors for survival. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2016; 41 (07) 753-757
• 17 Southard JH, Belzer FO. Organ preservation. Annu Rev Med 1995; 46: 235-247
• 18 Lotens WA, van de Linde FJG, Havenith G. Effects of condensation in clothing on heat transfer. Ergonomics 1995; 38 (06) 1114-1131
• 19 Farnworth B. A numerical-model of the combined diffusion of heat and water-vapor through clothing. Text Res J 1986; 56 (11) 653-665
• 20 Fudge J. Preventing and managing hypothermia and frostbite injury. Sports Health 2016; 8 (02) 133-139
• 21 Partlin MM, Chen J, Holdgate A. The preoperative preservation of amputated digits: an assessment of proposed methods. J Trauma 2008; 65 (01) 127-131
• 22 Buntic RF, Brooks D. Standardized protocol for artery-only fingertip replantation. J Hand Surg Am 2010; 35 (09) 1491-1496
• 23 Salemark L, Wieslander JB, Dougan P, Arnljots B. Effect of low and ultra low oral doses of acetylsalicylic acid in microvascular surgery. An experimental study in the rabbit. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1991; 25 (03) 203-211
• 24 Bannister CM, Chapman SA. The influence of systemic aspirin on rat small diameter vein grafts: a scanning electron microscopic study. Surg Neurol 1980; 13 (02) 99-108
• 25 Heggers JP, Robson MC, Manavalen K. , et al. Experimental and clinical observations on frostbite. Ann Emerg Med 1987; 16 (09) 1056-1062
• 26 Jubbal KT, Zavlin D, Suliman A. The effect of age on microsurgical free flap outcomes: an analysis of 5,951 cases. Microsurgery 2017; 37 (08) 858-864
• 27 Wang H. Secondary surgery after digit replantation: its incidence and sequence. Microsurgery 2002; 22 (02) 57-61
• 28 Waikakul S, Sakkarnkosol S, Vanadurongwan V, Un-nanuntana A. Results of 1018 digital replantations in 552 patients. Injury 2000; 31 (01) 33-40