Gender Comparison of Medical Student Microsurgical Skills in a Laboratory Model

Rowena Sudario-Lumague; Yuan-Cheng Chiang; Tsan-Shiun Lin

doi:10.1055/s-0038-1626694

Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, Inhaltsverzeichnis

J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34(05): 359-362
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1626694

Original Article

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Gender Comparison of Medical Student Microsurgical Skills in a Laboratory Model

Rowena Sudario-Lumague

¹Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

,

Yuan-Cheng Chiang

¹Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

,

Tsan-Shiun Lin

¹Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Background Perceived gender-related differences in surgical skills could limit opportunities available for any aspiring surgeon. There should be more available literature and logical analysis of these observations. The objective of this study is to evaluate the microsurgical skills of male and female medical students using a standard scale in the laboratory.

Methods This study included medical students enrolled in the Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital from 2002 to 2015 who were evaluated by a senior consultant for their microsurgical skills. A standard numeric scale was used to evaluate their suturing technique after basic microsurgical training. Differences in the scores between male and female medical students were evaluated using statistical analysis.

Results A total of 578 medical students were included in the study. There were 393 males (68%) and 185 females (32%). Using statistical analysis, there is no significant difference in the distribution of scores (p-Value = 0.78) and mean scores (p-Value = 0.75) between the two groups.

Conclusions This study shows that microsurgical skills of male and female medical students are similar. Equal opportunities in the eventual pursuit of the surgical specialties should be available regardless of gender.

Keywords

microsurgical training - gender comparison - microsurgical skill - microsurgery - basic surgical skill - gender difference

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Scholz M, Mücke T, Hölzle F. , et al. A program of microsurgical training for young medical students: are younger students better?. Microsurgery 2006; 26 (06) 450-455
2 Hossain N, Hossain T. Motivating factors and barriers towards choosing a career in general surgery: a review of literature. Int Surg J 2015; 2 (02) 121-124
3 Lineaweaver WC. New microsurgical applications: implications for the infrastructures of plastic surgery. Clin Plast Surg 2002; 29 (01) 81-93
4 Sanfey HA, Saalwachter-Schulman AR, Nyhof-Young JM, Eidelson B, Mann BD. Influences on medical student career choice: gender or generation?. Arch Surg 2006; 141 (11) 1086-1094 , discussion 1094
5 Park J, Minor S, Taylor RA, Vikis E, Poenaru D. Why are women deterred from general surgery training?. Am J Surg 2005; 190 (01) 141-146
6 Austin RE, Wanzel KR. Exposure to plastic surgery during undergraduate medical training: a single-institution review. Plast Surg (Oakv) 2015; 23 (01) 43-47
7 Pianosi K, Bethune C, Hurley KF. Medical student career choice: a qualitative study of fourth-year medical students at Memorial University, Newfoundland. CMAJ Open 2016; 4 (02) E147-E152
8 Lin TS, Chiang YC. Correlation between microsurgical course performance and future surgical training selection by intern and junior residents. Microsurgery 2008; 28 (03) 171-172
9 O'Herrin JK, Lewis BJ, Rikkers LF, Chen H. Why do students choose careers in surgery?. J Surg Res 2004; 119 (02) 124-129
10 Lee S. Manual of Microsurgery. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1985
11 Germann G, Bruner S, Pelzer M. Structure and organization of a microsurgically oriented plastic surgery unit. March 11, 2004. Available at: http://www.interscience.wiley.com . Accessed July 29, 2016
12 Elneel FHF, Carter F, Tang B, Cuschieri A. Extent of innate dexterity and ambidexterity across handedness and gender: implications for training in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2008; 22 (01) 31-37
13 Grantcharov TP, Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Rosenberg J. Impact of hand dominance, gender, and experience with computer games on performance in virtual reality laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 2003; 17 (07) 1082-1085
14 Lou Z, Yan FH, Zhao ZQ. , et al. The sex difference in basic surgical skills learning: a comparative study. J Surg Educ 2016; 73 (05) 902-905
15 McGoldrick RB, Davis CR, Paro J, Hui K, Nguyen D, Lee GK. Motion analysis for microsurgical training: objective measures of dexterity, economy of movement, and ability. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136 (02) 231e-240e
16 Evgeniou E, Tsironi M, Riley D. Improving fellowship training in microsurgery: a threshold concepts perspective on the curricula of fellowship programs. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31 (08) 579-589
17 Ali A, Subhi Y, Ringsted C, Konge L. Gender differences in the acquisition of surgical skills: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2015; 29 (11) 3065-3073
18 Abelson JS, Chartrand G, Moo TA, Moore M, Yeo H. The climb to break the glass ceiling in surgery: trends in women progressing from medical school to surgical training and academic leadership from 1994 to 2015. Am J Surg 2016; 212 (04) 566-572.e1
19 Wallis CJ, Ravi B, Coburn N, Nam RK, Detsky AS, Satkunasivam R. Comparison of postoperative outcomes among patients treated by male and female surgeons: a population based matched cohort study. BMJ 2017; 359: j4366
20 Furnas HJ, Johnson DJ, Bajaj AK, Kalliainen L, Rohrich RJ. Women and men in plastic surgery: how they differ and why it matters. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (03) 743-745
21 Silva AK, Preminger A, Slezak S, Phillips LG, Johnson DJ. Melting the plastic ceiling: overcoming obstacles to foster leadership in women plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (03) 721-729