Das neue Unbewusste

• Literatur

• 1 Adams JK. Laboratory studies of behavior without awareness. Psychology Bulletin 1957; 54: 383-405.
• 2 Bargh JA, Chen M, Burrows L. Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. J Pers Soc Psychol 1996; 71: 230-44.
• 3 Bargh JA. et al. The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. J Pers Soc Psychol 2001; 81: 1014-27.
• 4 Bargh JA. Bypassing the will: Toward demystifying the nonconscious control of social behavior. In: Hassin RR, Uleman JS, Bargh JA. (Hg). The New Unconscious. Oxford Series in Social Cognition and Social Neuroscience, S. 37-58 Oxford: University Press; 2005
• 5 Bargh JA, Williams EL. The automaticity of social life. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2006; 15: 1-4.
• 6 Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Muraven M, Tice DM. Ego depletion: is the active self a limited resource?. J Pers Soc Psychol 1998; 74: 1252-65.
• 7 Bavelas JA, Black A, Lemery CR, Mullett J. “I show how you feel”: Motor mimicry asa communicative act. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986; 50: 322-9.
• 8 Bavelas JB, Black A, Lemery CR, Mullett J. Motor mimicry as primitive empathy. In: Eisenberg N, Strayer J. (Hg). Empathy and its development, S. 317-38 Cambridge, UK: University Press; 1987
• 9 Blankenburg F. et al. Imperceptible stimuli and sensory processing impediment. Science 2003; 299: 1864.
• 10 Chartrand TL, Bargh JA. The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. J Pers Soc Psychol 1999; 76: 893-910.
• 11 Chartrand TL, Maddux WW, Lakin JL. Beyond the perception-behavior link: The ubiquitous utility and motivational moderators of mimikry. In: Hassin RR, Uleman JS, Bargh JA. (Hg). The New Unconscious. Oxford Series in Social Cognition and Social Neuroscience, S. 334-61 Oxford: University Press; 2005
• 12 Dijksterhuis A, van Knippenberg A. The relation between perception and behavior, or how to win a game of Trivial Pursuit. J Pers Soc Psychol 1998; 74: 865-77.
• 13 Dijksterhuis A, Aarts H, Smith PK. The power of the subliminal: On subliminal persuasion and other potential applications. In: Hassin RR, Uleman JS, Bargh JA. (Hg). The New Unconscious. Oxford Series in Social Cognition and Social Neuroscience, S. 77-107 Oxford: University Press; 2005
• 14 Dimberg U. Facial reactions to facial expressions. Psychophysiology 1982; 19: 643-7.
• 15 Eberhardt JE. et al. Looking deathworthy. Perceived stereotypicality of black defendants predicts capital-sentencing outcomes. Psychological Science 2006; 17: 383-6.
• 16 Ferguson MJ, Bargh JA. How social perception can automatially influence behavior. Trends in Cognitive sciences 2004; 08: 33-9.
• 17 Freud S. Neue Folge der Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Psychoanalyse. Gesammelte Werke, Bd. XV. Frankfurt: S. Fischer; 1940
• 18 Kunst-Wilson WR, Zajonc RB. Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science 1980; 207: 557-8.
• 19 Leibniz GW. Neue Abhandlungen über den menschlichen Verstand. Meiner Philosophische Bibliothek: Hamburg. 1767/1971.
• 20 Libet B, Alberts WW, Wright EW, Feinstein B. Responses of human somatosensory cortex to stimuli below threshold for conscious sensation. Science 1967; 158: 1597-600.
• 21 Marcel A. Conscious and unconscious perception: An approach to the relations between phenomenal experience and perceptual processes. Cognitive Psychology 1983; 15: 238-300.
• 22 Meltzoff AN, Moore MK. Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science 1977; 198: 75-8.
• 23 Moore TE. Subliminal Advertising: What you see is what you get. Journal of Marketing 1982; 06: 38-47.
• 24 Muraven M, Tice DM, Baumeister RF. Self-control as a limited resource: Regulatory depletion patterns. J Pers Soc Psychol 1998; 74: 774-89.
• 25 Murphy ST, Zajonc RB. Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. J Pers Soc Psychol 1993; 64: 723-39.
• 26 Neumann R, Strack F. “Mood contagion”: The automatic transfer of mood between persons. J Pers Soc Psychol 2000; 79: 221-3.
• 27 O’Toole R, Dubin R. Baby feeding and body sway: An experiment in George Herbert Mead´s “taking the role of the other”. J Pers Soc Psychol 1968; 10: 59-65.
• 28 Pratkanis AR. The Cargo-cult science of subliminal persuasion. Skeptical Inquirer 1992; 16: 260-72.
• 29 Provine RR. Contagious laughter: Laughter is a sufficieent stimulus for laughs and smiles. Bulletin of the Psychological Society 1992; 30: 1-4.
• 30 Rizzolati G, Fogassi L, Gallese V. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2001; 02: 661-70.
• 31 Rogers M, Smith KH. Public perception of subliminal advertising: Why practitioners shouldn’t ignore this issue. Journal of Advertising Research 1993; 33: 10.
• 32 Simner ML. Newborn´s response to the cry of another infant. Developmental Psychology 1971; 05: 136-50.
• 33 Singer T. et al. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not the sensory components of pain. Science 2004; 303: 1157-62.
• 34 Singer T. et al. Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Nature 2006; 439: 466-9.
• 35 Spitzer M. Word-Associations in experimental psychiatry: A historical perspective. In: Spitzer M, Uehlein FA, Schwartz MA, Mundt C. (Hg). Phenomenology, Language and Schizophrenia, S. 160-96 New York: Springer; 1992
• 36 Spitzer M. Soziale Neurowissenschaft. Zur kognitiven Neurowissenschaft sozialer Prozesse oder warum Vorurteile dumm machen. Nervenheilkunde 2004; 23: 1-4.
• 37 Spitzer M. Zur Neurobiologie der Schadenfreude. Fairness und warum Polizisten gebraucht werden. Nervenheilkunde 2006; 25: 223-8.
• 38 Spitzer M. Namen – nichts als Schall und Rauch?. Nervenheilkunde 2006; 25: 677-9.
• 39 Theus KT. Subliminal advertising and the psychology of processing unconscious stimuli: A review of research. Psychology & Marketing 1994; 11: 271-90.
• 40 Uleman JS. Introduction: Becoming aware of the new unconscious. In: Hassin RR, Uleman JS, Bargh JA. (Hg). The New Unconscious. Oxford Series in Social Cognition and Social Neuroscience, S. 3-15 Oxford: University Press 2005.;
• 41 Whitehead AN. Introduction to Mathematics. Holt. New York: 1911
• 42 Wilson TD, Schooler JW. Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. J Pers Soc Psychol 1991; 60: 181-92.
• 43 Zajonc RB. et al. Convergence in the physical appearance of spouses. Motivation and Emotion 1987; 11: 335-46.
• 44 Zimmermann M. The nervous system in the context of information theory. In Schmidt RF, Thewes G. (eds): Human Physiology. Berlin: Springer; 1989: 166-73.