Nervenheilkunde, Table of Contents Nervenheilkunde 2007; 26(09): 810-812DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1626932 Geist & Gehirn Schattauer GmbH Die Qual der Wahl M. Spitzer Recommend Article Abstract Buy Article Full Text References Literatur 1 Goldstein N. Inside influence report: Is your company offering too much? When more is less. In Cibbarelli C, Gordon B. (Hg): Influence at work www.insideinfluence.com/year03/08/Moreis Less/ 2 Iyengar SS, Lepper MR. When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing?. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology 2000; 79: 995-1006. 3 Iyengar SS, Jiang W, Huberman G. How much choice is too much?: Contributions to 401(k) retirement plans. In: Mitchell OS, Utkus S. (Hg) Pension design and structure: New lessons from behavioral finance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2004: 83-95. 4 Iyengar SS, Wells RE, Schwartz B. Doing better but feeling worse: Looking fort he “best” job undermines satisfaction. Psychological Science 2006; 17: 143-150. 5 Langer EJ. The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1975; 32: 311-328. 6 Lefcourt HM. The function of the illusions of control and freedom. American Psychologist 1973; 28: 417-425. 7 Schwartz B. Self-determination: The tyranny of freedom. American Psychologist 2000; 55: 79-88. 8 Shah AM, Wolford G. Buying behavior as a function of parametric variation of number of choices. Psychological Science 2007; 18: 369-370. 9 Spitzer M. Vom Sinn des Lebens. Nervenheilkunde 2006; 25: 513-520. 10 Spitzer M. Das neue Unbewusste. Nervenheilkunde 2006; 25: 615-622. 11 Spitzer M. Das neue Unbewusste II. Nervenheilkunde 2006; 25: 701-708. 12 Spitzer M. Entscheiden. Nervenheilkunde 2006; 25: 969-973. 13 Zuckerman M, Porac J, Lathin D, Smith R, Deci EL. On the importance of self-determination for intrinsically motivated behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1978; 04: 443-446.
