Subscribe to RSS
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60f12/60f1207d64e709348d01b6a01c0352d16ea3240a" alt=""
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1627924
Echocardiographic Analysis and Outcome in Patients with Functional Mitral Regurgitation Receiving MitraClip Therapy
Publication History
Publication Date:
22 January 2018 (online)
Objectives: MitraClip therapy has proved to be safe and effective for high-risk surgical patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR), but data regarding functional MR (FMR) are sparse. We assessed echocardiographic parameters and outcome in FMR patients receiving MitraClip therapy.
Methods: From 09/2008 to 10/2016, a total of 466 patients with FMR received MitraClip therapy at our center. Follow-ups (FU) were conducted after 6/12 months; annually thereafter until the 5th postinterventional year. Groups were compared by χ2 tests. Changes in echocardiographic parameters from baseline to 12-month FU were examined by paired t-tests.
Results: Mean age was 74.0 ± 8.8 years; 298 patients were male. Mean logistic EuroSCORE I/STS score was 26.1 ± 17.2/5.5 ± 4.9. All patients were graded MR≥3+ at baseline. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 36.2 ± 13.7% and 49.8% of the patients showed LVEDD< 65mm. A mean of 1.5 ± 0.7 clips were implanted. Immediate procedural success was achieved in 92.7% of the patients. At discharge, 54.9% of patients were graded with residual MR (rMR)≤1+, 37.8% with rMR = 2+ and 7.3% with rMR≥3+. No significant differences in rMR distribution were seen in both LVEDD groups (< 65mm vs ≥65 mm, p > 0.05) at discharge. The 12-month echocardiographic FU (n = 224) showed that 43.8% of the patients were graded with rMR≤1+, 44.6% with rMR = 2+ and 11.6% with rMR ≥3+. LVEDD/LVESD decreased from 66.0 ± 10.7/54.3 ± 12mm to 64.9 ± 11.3/53.4 ± 13.8mm (p = 0.03/0.14). LVEF remained stable with 35.9 ± 14.6% (baseline: 37.5 ± 14.4%, p = 0.06). Percentages of patients with rMR = 2+ (41.6% vs 49.0%, p = 0.32) and rMR≥3+ (7.9 vs. 15.3%, p = 0.12) were not significantly different in the LVEDD < 65 mm and LVEDD ≥65 mm group, whereas the number of patients with rMR ≤1+ was significantly higher in the LVEDD < 65 mm group (50.5 vs 33.7%, p = 0.04). Cumulative survival of FMR patients at 1, 2 and 5 years was 75.2, 59.2, and 33.5%. NYHA class improved significantly from 3.2 ± 0.5 to 2.2 ± 0.7 within 12 months (p < 0.01). Within 5 years of FU, 24 patients needed repeat MitraClip therapy; 14 patients had mitral valve replacement.
Conclusion: MitraClip therapy results in acceptable clinical outcome in FMR patients. A tendency toward ongoing reverse left ventricular remodeling in all FMR patients could be demonstrated at 12-month FU. Better quantitative stratification of FMR patients is warranted to predict an optimal post-interventional result after MitraClip therapy and the associated clinical outcome.