RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1628135
Challenges and Perspectives of Computerassisted Instruction in Medical Education
Lessons Learned from Seven Years of Experience with the CAMPUS SystemPublikationsverlauf
Publikationsdatum:
24. Januar 2018 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00035037/200701/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0038-1628135-1.jpg)
Summary
Objectives: In this paper we discuss solutions to the problem that medical teachers and students do not use modern computer-assisted instruction systems in medical education as much as expected by their developers.
Methods: As an example for a modern problem-based CAI system we introduce the CAMPUS shell system for case-based training in medicine.
Results: CAMPUS has received several awards and positive evaluation results. Nevertheless, the usage of such systems in courses and for self-study could be increased.
Conclusions: Curricular integration of CAI as well as further improvements on existing CAI systems to increase the usage in medical education is essential.
-
References
- 1 Harvard Medical School.. The new Pathway M.D. Program. http://hms.harvard.edu/admissions/default.asp?page=pathway. Last accessed October 20, 2006
- 2 HeiCuMed (Heidelberger Curriculum Medicinale). www.heicumed.uni-hd.de.
- 3 Marshall University. Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine. The Interactive Patient. http://medicus.marshall.edu.
- 4 Fischer MR. CASUS – An authoring and learning tool supporting diagnostic reasoning. In: Daetwyler C. (ed). Use of computers in medical education (Part II). Zeitschrift für Hochschuldidaktik 2000. 01 87-98.
- 5 Haag M, Bauch M, Heid J, Martsfeld I, Leven FJ, Geiss HK, Jünger J, Tönshoff B. CAMPUS – A Flexible, Interactive System for Web-Based, Problem- Based Learning and Assessment in Medical Curricula. In: Hasman A, Mantas J. (eds). Health and Medical Informatics Applications – Educational Aspects. Proceedings of the European Federation of Medical Informatics Special Topic Conference 2005. Berlin: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft; 2005. pp 96-8.
- 6 Haag M, Maylein L, Leven FJ, Tönshoff B, Haux R. Web-based training: a new paradigm in computer- assisted instruction in medicine. Int J Med Inf 1999; 53: 79-90.
- 7 Medidaprix 2002. www.medidaprix.de/mdd_2002/. Last accessed October 20, 2006.
- 8 COMENIUS medals. www.gpi-online.de/indexg-3844.html. Last accessed October 20, 2006.
- 9 Riedel J, Fitzgerald G, Leven FJ, Tönshoff B. The design of computerized practice fields for problem solving and contextualized transfer. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 2003; 12: 377-98.
- 10 Hovenga EJS, Bricknell L. Changing Academic Roles – New Approaches to Teaching and Distance Learning in Australia. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45: 288-93.
- 11 Frey P, Hofer D. The use of print and non-print learning resources among medical students: A survey. www.aum.iawf.unibe.ch/did/for/AMEE1.pdf. Last accessed October 20, 2006
- 12 Wass V, Van der Vleuten C, Shatzer J, Jones R. Assessment of clinical competence. Lancet 2001; 357: 945-9.
- 13 Felciano RM, Dev P. Multimedia clinical simulation based on patient records: Authoring, user interface, pedagogy. Technical report, Stanford University School of Medicine. 1994 http://smi-web.stanford.edu/pubs/SMI_Report/SMI-94-0535.pdf. Last accessed October 20, 2006
- 14 CASEPORT, a portal for case-based training in medicine. www.caseport.de.