Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1628731
Rekanalisationstherapien beim akuten Schlaganfall
Recanalization therapy in acute strokePublication History
Eingegangen am:
27 October 2009
angenommen am:
01 November 2009
Publication Date:
24 January 2018 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00034916/201003/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0038-1628731_de-1.jpg)
Zusammenfassung
In der Frühphase des Schlaganfalls können neben der intravenösen Lyse verschiedene endovaskuläre Methoden zur Gefäßrekanalisation eingesetzt werden. Die mechanischen Rekanalisationsmethoden haben den Vorteil, dass sie auch bei Lysekontraindikationen und nach erfolgloser i. v. Lyse verwendet werden können; das therapeutische Zeitfenster ist breiter als bei der i. v. Lyse, und es sind unmittelbar nach der Intervention deutlich höhere Rekanalisationsraten nachweisbar. Der bestehenden Diskrepanz zwischen den hohen Gefäßeröffnungsraten und dem klinischen Outcome kann entscheidend durch eine verbesserte Patientenselektion begegnet werden. Im Rahmen dieser Übersicht werden die derzeit wichtigsten Rekanalisationstherapien vorgestellt. Die aktuelle Studienlage und der Stellenwert der Behandlungsmethoden werden anhand der Hauptindikationen zur mechanischen Rekanalisation – dem Mediahauptstammverschluss, dem Carotis-T-Verschluss und der Basilaristhrombose – erörtert.
Summary
In the acute stroke therapy several interventional methods are available for the recanalization of arteries in addition to intravenous thrombolysis. Endovascular therapy primarily offers the following advantages: it can be used when thrombolysis is contraindicated as well as after unsuccessful intravenous thrombolysis, the therapeutic time window exceeds that of intravenous thrombolysis, and significantly higher recanalization rates are achieved. However, there is generally a discrepancy between vessel recanalization rates and clinical patient outcome.A better patient selection might counteract this imbalance in the future. This overview outlines the most important current recanalization therapies. Furthermore, a review of current studies is presented and the value of the methods of treatment is discussed with respect to the main indications for the recanalization therapy, the occlusions of the middle cerebral artery, carotid-T and basilar artery.
-
Literatur
- 1 Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. N Engl J Med 1995; 333 (24) 1581-7.
- 2 Guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008; 25 (05) 457-507.
- 3 Hacke W. et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2008; 359 (13) 1317-29.
- 4 Furlan A. et al. Intra-arterial prourokinase for acute ischemic stroke. The PROACT II study: a randomized controlled trial. Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism. JAMA 1999; 282 (21) 2003-11.
- 5 del Zoppo GJ. et al. PROACT: a phase II randomized trial of recombinant pro-urokinase by direct arterial delivery in acute middle cerebral artery stroke. PROACT Investigators. Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism. Stroke 1998; 29 (01) 4-11.
- 6 Hacke W. et al. Association of outcome with early stroke treatment: pooled analysis of ATLANTIS, ECASS, and NINDS rt-PA stroke trials. Lancet 2004; 363 (9411): 768-74.
- 7 Wolpert SM. et al. Neuroradiologic evaluation of patients with acute stroke treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1993; 14 (01) 3-13.
- 8 Barnwell SL. et al. Safety and efficacy of delayed intraarterial urokinase therapy with mechanical clot disruption for thromboembolic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994; 15 (10) 1817-22.
- 9 Lisboa RC, Jovanovic BD, Alberts MJ. Analysis of the safety and efficacy of intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy in ischemic stroke. Stroke 2002; 33 (12) 2866-71.
- 10 Eckert B. et al. Local intra-arterial fibrinolysis in acute hemispheric stroke: effect of occlusion type and fibrinolytic agent on recanalization success and neurological outcome. Cerebrovasc Dis 2003; 15 (04) 258-63.
- 11 Lutsep HL. Mechanical endovascular recanalization therapies. Curr Opin Neurol 2008; 21 (01) 70-5.
- 12 Gandhi CD, Christiano LD, Prestigiacomo CJ. Endovascular management of acute ischemic stroke. Neurosurg Focus 2009; 26 (03) E2.
- 13 Nogueira RG, Schwamm LH, Hirsch JA. Endovascular approaches to acute stroke, part 1. Drugs, devices, and data. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30 (04) 649-61.
- 14 Nogueira RG. et al. Endovascular approaches to acute stroke, part 2: a comprehensive review of studies and trials. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30 (05) 859-75.
- 15 Smith WS. et al. Safety and efficacy of mechanical embolectomy in acute ischemic stroke: results of the MERCI trial. Stroke 2005; 36 (07) 1432-8.
- 16 Smith WS. et al. Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: final results of the Multi MERCI trial. Stroke 2008; 39 (04) 1205-12.
- 17 The penumbra pivotal stroke trial: safety and effectiveness of a new generation of mechanical devices for clot removal in intracranial large vessel occlusive disease. Stroke 2009; 40 (08) 2761-8.
- 18 Schonewille WJ. et al. Treatment and outcomes of acute basilar artery occlusion in the Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study (BASICS): a prospective registry study. Lancet Neurol 2009; 08 (08) 724-30.