Nuklearmedizin 1990; 29(02): 51-53
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1629513
Originaler Artikel
Schattauer GmbH

Cholescintigraphy versus Infusion Cholecystography in Acute Cholecystitis

G. Edlund
1   From the Departments of Surgery, Östersund, Sweden
,
V. Kempi
2   From the Departments of Radiophysics, Sjukhuset, Östersund, Sweden
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 05 October 1989

Publication Date:
05 February 2018 (online)

Patients with the clinical diagnosis of acute cholecystitis were studied with intravenous cholecystography and cholescintigraphy. The two examinations alternated in a random order. The final diagnosis was ascertained by surgery in most patients. Either cholecystography or cholescintigraphy could be used in the diagnostics of patients with suspected acute cholecystitis. The methods have about the same accuracy. However, cholescintigraphy is performed more easily and more rapidly than intravenous cholecystography.

Zusammenfassung

Patienten mit einer klinisch diagnostizierten akuten Cholezystitis wurden mittels einer intravenösen Cholezystographie und Choleszintigraphie untersucht, wobei die beiden Methoden alternierend nach dem Zufallsprinzip eingesetzt wurden. Die endgültige Diagnose wurde bei den meisten Patienten chirurgisch festgelegt. Sowohl die Cholezystographie als auch die Choleszintigraphie konnten zur Diagnose bei Patienten mit Verdacht auf akute Cholezystitis eingesetzt werden; beide Methoden sind gleichwertig. Die Choleszintigraphie kann jedoch leichter und schneller als die intravenöse Cholezystographie durchgeführt werden.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Bornhurst R A, Hcitzman E R, McAfee J G. Double-dose drip-infusion cholangiography. J Am Med Assoc 1968; 206: 1489-94.
  • 2 Brunkwall J, Börjesson B, Lindberg B. Cholescintiscan or infusion cholescystography in acute cholecystitis. Acta Chir Scand 1985; 151: 139-42.
  • 3 Edlund G, Kempi V, van der Linden W. Transient nonvisualization of the gallbladder by Tc-99m HIDA cholescintigraphy in acute pancreatitis. J Nucl Med 1982; 23: 117-20.
  • 4 Edlund G, Kempi V, van der Linden W. Jaundice in acute cholecystitis without common-duct stones. Acta Chir Scand 1983; 149: 597-601.
  • 5 Elman R. The diagnosis and treatment of acute non-hemorrhagic pancreatitis. Am J Digest Dis 1938; 04: 732-4.
  • 6 Essenhigh D M. Management of acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 1966; 53: 1032-8.
  • 7 Gatt D, Jantet G. Infusion cholecystography as the initial investigation in acute biliary disease. Br J Surg 1987; 74: 204-5.
  • 8 Halasz N A. Counterfeit cholecystitis. Am J Surg 1975; 130: 189-93.
  • 9 Howard J M. Gallbladder function (cholecystographic studies) following nonspecific trauma. Surgery 1954; 36: 1051-5.
  • 10 Kempi V, van der Linden J, van der Linden W. A study of bile duct dynamics using computer-assisted 99mTc-HIDA scintigraphy. Eur J Nucl Med 1982; 07: 541-4.
  • 11 Krasna M J, Flancbaum L, Trooskin S Z. et al. Gastrointestinal complications after cardiac surgery. Surgery 1988; 104: 773-80.
  • 12 van der Linden W, Kempi V, Edlund G. Function of liver, gallbladder and sphincter of Oddi after major surgery studied by computer-assisted cholescintigraphy and real-time ultrasonography. Br J Surg 1983; 70: 497-501.
  • 13 van der Linden W, Kempi V. Filling of the gallbladder as studied by computer-assisted Tc-99m HIDA scintigraphy. J Nucl Med 1984; 25: 292-8.
  • 14 Siegel S. Nonparametric statistics for behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1956
  • 15 Spitz J, Hildebrandt H, Clemenz N, Schattenberg J, Weigand H. Clinical value and diagnostic relevance of 99mTc-Diethyl-Iodo- IDA (IODIDA) compared to 99mTc-Di- ethyl-IDA (HEPATOBIDA) in patients with increased serum bilirubin. NUC-Comp 1987; 18: 61-8.
  • 16 Zeman R K, Burrel M I, Cahow C E. et al. Diagnostic utility of cholescintigraphy and ultrasonography in acute cholecystitis. Am J Surg 1981; 141: 446-51.