Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1995; 08(01): 36-39
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632424
Clinical Report
Schattauer GmbH

Navicular Syndrome: Preliminary Assessment of Radiographic Scoring

J. R. Field
1   From the Department of Clinical Studies and Population Medicine
,
H. Dobson
1   From the Department of Clinical Studies and Population Medicine
,
B. Bonnett
2   Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received for publication 02 August 1994

Publication Date:
09 February 2018 (online)

Summary

The purpose of this preliminary study was to record observer agreement in the assessment of navicular bone radiographs. This was performed to assess whether a navicular lesion scoring system would augment tests currently available. Radiographs from both normal horses and horses affected with navicular disease were used in the study.

The dorsoproximal-palmarodistal oblique (65°) view of both forefeet of 54 individuals were assessed in an independent and unprejudiced manner by two observers, six months apart. The total synovial fossae score and the total number of lesions seen were recorded and intra-class correlation coefficients determined. From this the level of intraobserver and inter-observer agreement was determined. Substantial intra-observer agreement (ICC 0.61–0.80) for total synovial fossae score and total number of lesions was attained by one observer (No. 2) whilst the other (No. 1) attained only poor to moderate aggreement (ICC 0.40–0.60). The interobserver agreement ranged from moderate to substantial.

In view of the inconsistency seen, in this preliminary evaluation, it is our belief that a navicular scoring system would not augment currently available diagnostic tests.

This preliminary study examines the consistency of observer agreement for evaluation of navicular bone radiographs. A low level of observer aggreement, and hence consistency, was seen. The results suggest that the use of a navicular scoring system to augment diagnostic tests may be of little value.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Valdez H, Adams OR, Peyton LC. Navicular disease in the hindlimbs of the horse. JAVMA 1978; 172: 291-2.
  • 2 Poulos PW. Correlation of radiographic signs and histological changes in navicular disease. Proc AAEP. 1983: 241-5.
  • 3 Poulos PW, Smith MF. The nature of enlarged vascular channels in the navicular bone of the horse. Vet Radiol 1988; 29: 60-4.
  • 4 Pool RR, Meagher DM, Stover SM. Pathophysiology of navicular syndrome. Vet Clin Nth Amer 1989; 5 (01) 109-29.
  • 5 O’Brien TR, Millman TM, Pool RR, Suter PF. Navicular disease in the thoroughbred horse: A morphologic investigation relative to a new radiographic projection. JAVR 1975; 16: 39-50.
  • 6 Numans SR. Van der Watering CC. Navicular disease: Podotrochlitis chronica aseptica podotrochlosis. Eq Vet J 1973; 5: 1-7.
  • 7 MacGregor CM. Radiographic assessment of navicular bones based on changes in the distal nutrient foramina. Eq Vet J 1986; 18: 203-6.
  • 8 Streiner DL, Norman GR, Monroe Blum H. PDQ Epidemiology. Toronto: Decker; 1979: 84-101.
  • 9 Feinstein AR. Clinimetrics. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1987: 167-211.
  • 10 Landis RJ, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159-74.
  • 11 Fleiss JL, Cohen J. The equivalence of weighted Kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educ Psychol Meas 1973; 33: 613-9.
  • 12 Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Guyatt GH, Tugwell P. Clinical Epidemiology: A Basic Science for Clinical Medicine. Boston: Little, Brown and Company; 1991: 19-110.
  • 13 Rose RJ, Taylor BJ, Steel JD. Navicular disease in the horse: an analysis of seventy cases and assessment of a special radiographic view. J Equine Med Surg 1978; 2: 492-7.
  • 14 Huskamp B, Becker M. Diagnosis and prognosis of changes in the sesamoid bone of the forelimb of horses as seen by radiography during examination before sale. Praktische Tierarzt 1980; 61: 858-63.
  • 15 Norden C, Philipps E, Levy P. Variation in interpretation of intravenous pyelograms. Am J Epidemiol 1970; 91: 155-60.
  • 16 Chamberlain J, Rogers P, Price JL. et al Validity of clinical examination and mammography as screening tests for breast cancer. Lancet 1971; 2: 1026-30.
  • 17 Reif JS, Rhodes WH, Cohen D. Canine pulmonary disease and the urban environment. I. The validity of radiographic examination for estimating the prevalence of pulmonary disease. Arch Environ Health 1970; 20: 676-83.
  • 18 Cushnaghan J, Cooper C, Dieppe P. et al Clinical assessment of osteoarthritis of the knee. Ann Rheum Dis 1990; 49: 768-70.
  • 19 Mulrow CD, Dolmatch BL, Delong ER. et al Observer variability in the pulmonary examination. J Gen Intern Med 1986; 1: 364-7.
  • 20 Coates RA, Fanning MM, Johnson JK, Calzavara L. Assessment of generalized lymphadenopathy in AIDS research: The degree of clinical agreement. J Clin Epidemiol 1977; 41: 267-73.
  • 21 Wright IM. A study of 118 cases of navicular disease: radiological features. Equine Vet J 1993; 25: 493-500.
  • 22 Turner TA, Kneller SK, Badertscher RR, Stowater JL. Radiographic changes in the navicular bones of normal horses. Proc AAEP. 1986: 309-14.