Conservative versus surgical treatment of metacarpal and metatarsal fractures in dogs

A. Kapatkin; R. Howe-Smith; F. Shofer

doi:10.1055/s-0038-1632646

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2000; 13(03): 123-127
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632646

Clinical Communication

Schattauer GmbH

Conservative versus surgical treatment of metacarpal and metatarsal fractures in dogs

Autor*innen

A. Kapatkin

¹University of Pennsylvania, Department of Clinical Studies, Philadelphia, USA
R. Howe-Smith

²Cherry Hill Animal Hospital, Cherry Hill, NJ, USA
F. Shofer

¹University of Pennsylvania, Department of Clinical Studies, Philadelphia, USA

Abstract

Summary

The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the outcome of metacarpal and metatarsal fractures treated conservatively versus surgically. Internal fixation of these fractures is recommended if there are: more than two metacarpal or metatarsal fractures in the same leg; two fractures of weight bearing bones; articular fractures; fractures with significant displacement; open fractures; and if the fractures occur in large breed, athletic, show, or working dogs. All 25 dogs fit the published criteria for surgical fixation to achieve a good outcome. Treatment (surgical versus conservative) was assigned based on owners’ decisions only. Follow-up was nine-68 months. Anything less than perfect in the categories used to evaluate outcome was considered a failure. Outcome was not statistically affected by surgery or conservative treatment, and no other factors significantly affected outcome. The present recommendations used in determining if surgery is necessary for these fractures were extrapolated from human literature and may have no scientific validity in our patients.

Open reduction and fixation was compared with closed reduction and coaptation for the treatment of multiple fractures of the metacarpal and metatarsal bones in 25 dogs.

Keywords

Metacarpal fractures - metatarsal fractures - canine - treatment outcome

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Holubec KD, Karlin JM, Scurran BL. Retrospective study of fifth metatarsal fractures. J Am Pod Med Assoc 1993; 83 (04) 215-22.
2 Hulse DA, Johnson AL. Metacarpal, metatarsal, phalangeal, and sesamoid bone fractures and luxations. In: Small Animal Surgery. 1st ed.. Fossum TW: (ed). St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book; 1997: 829-31.
3 Manley PA. Distal extremity fractures in small animals. J Vet Orthop 1983; 02: 38-48.
4 Muir P, Norris JL. Metacarpal and metatarsal fractures in dogs. J Sm Anim Pract 1997; 38 (08) 344-8.
5 Ness MG. Metatarsal III fractures in the racing greyhound. J Am Anim Pract 1993; 34: 85-9.
6 Newton CD. Fracture and dislocation of metacarpal bones, metacarpophalangeal joints, phalanges, and interphalangeal joints. In: Textbook of Small Animal Orthopaedics. Newton CD, Nunamaker DM. eds. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1985: 387-91.
7 Olmstead ML. Fractures of the bones of the hind limb. In: Small Animal Orthopaedics. 1st ed.. Olmstead ML. (ed). St. Louis: MosbyYear Book; 1995: 242.
8 O’Malley MJ, Hamilton WG, Munyak J. Fractures of the distal shaft of the fifth metatarsal “Dancer ‘s fracture”. Am J Sports Med 1996; 24 (02) 240-3.
9 O’Shea MK, Spak W, Sant SAnna, Johnson C. Clinical perspective of the treatment of fifth metatarsal fractures. J Am Pod Med Assoc 1995; 85 (09) 473-80.
10 Piermattei DL, Flo GL. Fractures of the carpus, metacarpus and phalanges. In: Handbook of Small Animal Orthopaedics and Fracture Management. 3rd ed.. Brinker WO, Piermattei DL, Flo GL. (ed). Philadelphia: WB Saunders 1997; 337.;
11 Probst CW, Millis DL. Carpus and digits. In: Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. 2nd ed.. Slatter D. (ed). Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1993: 1761-3.
12 Taylor RA, Dee JF. Tarsus and metatarsus. In. Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. 2nd ed.. Slatter D. (ed). Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1993: 1886.
13 Turner TM. Fractures of the bones in the front limb. In: Small Animal Orthopaedics. 1st ed.. Olmstead ML. (ed). St. Louis: MosbyYear Book; 1995: 216-7.