PDF herunterladen
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2000; 13(04): 197-203
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632660
Clinical Communication
Schattauer GmbH

Evaluation of an intracapsular technique for the treatment of cranial cruciate ligament rupture

Clinical, radiographic, scintigraphic and force plate analysis findings in 20 dogs
J. J. Geels
1   Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA
,
J. K. Roush
1   Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA
,
J. J. Hoskinson
1   Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA
,
R. M. McLaughlin
1   Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received 13. Dezember 1999

Accepted 14. April 2000

Publikationsdatum:
09. Februar 2018 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Summary

Treatment of cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) rupture using fascial replacement techniques have yielded good clinical results, with 85% to 93% of dogs returning to clinical soundness or intermittent lameness as evaluated by surgeons or owners, but have not been evaluated by force plate analysis long-term. The purpose of this study is to document the long-term clinical and radiographic outcome of dogs having CCL rupture stabilized with an underand- over fascial graft technique by owner assessment, clinical examination, force plate analysis, plain film radiography, and scintigraphy. Twenty dogs with previously repaired unilateral CCL rupture were used for the study. Although client satisfaction was high, force plate analysis revealed significantly lower vertical forces and impulses in the operated versus unoperated limbs. Radiographs and bone scans revealed significant bony changes and synovitis in the operated stifle relative to the unoperated stifle at a median of 17.5 months following repair. Lameness persists in dogs having undergone CCL repair using the under-and-over fascial graft technique; whether this lameness is secondary to progression of osteoarthritis or is a result of surgical repair is unknown.

The under-and-over fascial strip technique for stabilization of cranial cruciate ligament-deficient stifles has been evaluated using force plate analysis and nuclear scintigraphy. A median of 17.5 months following surgery, dogs are bearing less weight on the operated limbs as compared to the unoperated limbs. Significant synovitis and bony changes are present when compared to the unoperated limb as evaluated by scintigraphy. Despite these changes, clients are satisfied with the results of surgical repair.

Keywords

Cranial cruciate ligament - ground reaction force - scintigraphy - stifle - surgical management - under-and-over fascial graft
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Anderson MA, Mann FA. Force plate analysis: A noninvasive tool for gait evaluation. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1994; 16: 857-67.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Arnoczky SP, Taravan GB, Marshall JL. et al. The over-the-top procedure: a technique for anterior cruciate ligament substitution in the dog. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1979; 15: 283-90.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Budsberg SC, Verstraete MC, Soutas-Little RW. et al. Force plate analyses before and after stabilization of canine stifles for cruciate injury. Am J Vet Res 1988; 49: 1522-4.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Denny HR, Barr ARS. An evaluation of two “over-the-top” techniques for anterior cruciate ligament replacement in the dog. J Small Anim Pract 1984; 25: 759-69.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Denny HR, Barr ARS. A further evaluation of the “over the top” technique for anterior cruciate ligament replacement in the dog. J Sm Anim Pract 1987; 28: 681-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Dickinson CR, Nunamaker DM. Repair of ruptured anterior cruciate ligament in the dog; experience of 101 cases, using a modified fascia strip technique. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1977; 170 8: 827-30.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Dueland R, Bartel DL, Antonson E. Forceplate technique for gait analysis of total hip and excision arthroplasty. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1977; 13: 547-52.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Dupuis J, Harari J, Papageorges M. et al. Evaluation of fibular head transposition for repair of experimental cranial cruciate ligament injury in dogs. Vet Surg 1994; 23: 1-12.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Elkins AC, Pechman R, Kearney MT. A retrospective study evaluati ng the degree of degenerative joint disease in the stifle joint of dogs following surgical repair of anterior cruciate ligament rupture. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1991; 27: 533-9.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Flo GL. Modification of the lateral retinacular imbrication technique for stabilizing cruciate ligament injuries. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1975; 11: 570-6.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Gambardella PC, Wallace LF, Cassidy S. Lateral suture technique for management of anterior cruciate ligament rupture in dogs: a retrospective study. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1981; 17: 33-8.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Holtsinger RH, Parker RB, Beale BS. et al. The therapeutic efficacy of carprofen (Rimadyl-v™) in 209 clinical cases of canine degenerative joint disease. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1992; 05: 140-4.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Innes JF, Barr ARS, Patteson MW. Scintigraphy in the evaluation of osteoarthritis of the canine stifle joint. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1996; 09: 53-9.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Jevens DJ, DeCamp CE, Hauptman J. et al. Use of force-plate analysis of gait to compare two surgical techniques for treatment of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1996; 57: 389-93.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Moore KW, Read RA. Rupture of the Cranial Cruciate Ligament in Dogs-Part 1. Compend Cont Educ Pract Vet 1996; 18: 223-33.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Pichler ME. The fascia lata as the replacement for cranial cruciate ligament: two new surgical techniques. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1982; 18: 779-84.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Rorvik AM, Grondahl AM. Markers of osteoarthritis: A review of the literature. Vet Surg 1995; 24: 255-62.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Rumph PF, Kincaid SA, Visco DM. et al. Redistribution of vertical ground reaction force in dogs with experimentally induced chronic hindlimb lameness. Vet Surg 1995; 24: 384-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Rumph PF, Kincaid SA, Bairk DK. et al. Vertical ground reaction force distribution during experimentally induced acute synovitis in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1993; 54: 365-9.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Shires PK, Hulse DA, Lui W. The under and over fascial replacement technique for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in dogs: a retrospective study. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1984; 20: 69-77.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Shires PK, Hulse DH, Liu W. The underand-over fascial replacement technique for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in dogs: a retrospective study. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1984; 20: 69-77.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Slocum B, Slocum TD. Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy for repair of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in the canine. Vet Clin North Am: Sm Anim Pract 1993; 23 4: 777-95.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Vasseur PB. Clinical results following nonoperative management for rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament in dogs. Vet Surg 1984; 13: 243-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Vasseur PB, Berry CR. Progression of stifle osteoarthrosis following reconstruction of the cranial cruciate ligament in 21 dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1992; 28: 129-35.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Vasseur PB. Stifle joint. In: Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. 2nd ed. vol. 2. Slatter D. (ed) Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1993: 1841.
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Vasseur PB. Clinical results following conservative management for rupture of CCL in dogs. Vet Surg 1984; 13: 243-51.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar