Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2005; 18(03): 153-156
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632948
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Effects of three intramedullary pinning techniques on pin location and articular damage in the canine humerus

T. R. Sissener
1   The Queen's Veterinary School Hospital, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
,
E. Jones
2   Linevet, Lincoln, UK
,
S. J. Langley-Hobbs
1   The Queen's Veterinary School Hospital, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received 01. April 2005

Accepted 03. Mai 2005

Publikationsdatum:
22. Februar 2018 (online)

Preview

Summary

The purpose of this study was to compare the pin location and articular damage for intramedullary (IM) pins inserted into the humerus in a directed retrograde, non-directed retrograde, and normograde fashion. Proximal pin positioning in the humerus was significantly more cranial (p<0.05) using both retrograde techniques when compared to the normograde technique, although this did not cause significant interference with anatomical structures. The distance to the biceps tendon, transverse humeral ligament, and the distal pin location was similar with all insertion techniques, however two of ten pins passed in a non-directed retrograde fashion penetrated the shoulder joint. The results of this study suggest that although non-directed retrograde pinning cannot be recommended, either normograde or retrograde pins directed craniolaterally provide acceptable techniques for insertion of IM pins during distal humeral fracture repair.