Biceps Tenosynovitis in the Dog: Radiographic and Sonographic Findings

B. Rivers; L. Wallace; G. R. Johnston

doi:10.1055/s-0038-1633067

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1992; 05(02): 51-57
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1633067

Clinical Report

Schattauer GmbH

Biceps Tenosynovitis in the Dog: Radiographic and Sonographic Findings

B. Rivers

¹Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA

,

L. Wallace

¹Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA

,

G. R. Johnston

¹Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Summary

Ultrasonography of the biceps brachii tendon was prospectively evaluated as an ancillary diagnostic technique in comparison to arthrography in canine biceps tenosynovitis, in a series of six cases with surgical and histopathological confirmation of the diagnosis. Arthrographic findings, compatible with the disease, were present in all six cases, and correlated well with surgical findings. Significant differences were not found in the sonographic appearance of the affected versus the contralateral unaffected biceps brachii tendon proper. In two cases, sonography demonstrated a sonolucency surrounding the affected tendon; in one of these cases effusion within the biceps tendon sheath was noted at operation. In a third case, sonographic findings correlated with the presence of periosteal proliferation within the intertubercular groove noted on survey radio-graphs. Based on these six cases, arthrography appears to be a more sensitive ancillary diagnostic technique in this disorder than ultrasonography of the biceps brachii tendon.

Ultrasonography was prospectively evaluated in comparison to arthrography as an ancillary diagnostic technique in six cases of canine biceps tenosynovitis with surgical and histopathological confirmation of the diagnosis. Results obtained indicate arthrography appears to be a more sensitive ancillary diagnostic technique than ultra-sonography in this disorder.

Keywords

Biceps - tenosynovitis - arthrography - ultrasonography

Volltext

Referenzen

REFERENCES
1 Brinker WO, Piermattei DL, Flo GL. Handbook of small animal orthopedics and fracture treatment. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1990: 490-92.
2 Hulse DA. Diseases affecting the joints. In: Small animal surgery. Harvey CE, Newton CD, Schwartz A. (eds). Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Co; 1990: 634.
3 Piermattei DL. Orthopedic conditions of the shoulder region: Orthopedics I. In: Scientific Presentations of the 47th Annual Meeting of the American Animal Hospital Association. Los Angeles, California: 1980: 371.
4 Lincoln JD, Potter K. Tenosynovitis of the biceps brachii tendon in dogs. JAAHA 1984; 20: 385-92.
5 Hohn RB, Harrison JW. The pectoral limb: Bicipital tenosynovitis. In: Scientific Presentations of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the American Animal Hospital Association. Cincinnati, Ohio: 1975: 428.
6 LaHue TR, Brown SG, Roush JC, Ticer JW. Entrapment of joint mice in the bicipital tendon sheath as a sequela to osteochondritis dissecans of the proximal humerus in dogs: A report of six cases. JAAHA 1988; 24: 99-105.
7 Whittick WG. Canine Orthopedics. Lea and Febiger; Philadelphia: 1990: 770-2.
8 Newberg AH, Munn CS, Robbins AH. Complications of arthrography. Radiology 1985; 155: 605-6.
9 Hall FM, Rosenthal DI, Goldberg RP, Wyshak G. Morbidity from shoulder arthrography: Etiology, incidence, and prevention. AJR 1981; 136: 59-62.
10 Goldman AB, Dines DM, Warren RF. Shoulder arthrography: Technique, diagnosis, and clinical correlation. Boston: Little, Brown and Co; 1982: 1-6.
11 Fornage BD, Rifkin MD. Ultrasound examination of tendons. Radiologic Clinics of North America 1988; 26 (01) 87-107.
12 Middleton WD, Reinus WR, Totty WG. et al. Use of the biceps tendon apparatus. Radiology 1985; 157: 211-15.
13 Lind T, Reimann I, Larsen JK, Karstrup S. Sonography in soft-tissue trauma of the shoulder. Acta Orthop Scand 1989; 60 (01) 49-53.
14 Middleton WD, Reinus WR, Totty WG. et al. Ultrasonography evaluation of the rotator cuff and biceps tendon. J Bone Joint Surg 1986; 68-A(3): 440-50.
15 Ahuvuo J, Paavolainen P, Slatis P. Diagnostic value of sonography in lesions of the biceps tendon. Clin Orthop 1986; 202: 184-8.
16 Ahuvuo J, Paavolainen P, Bjorkenheim JM. Ultrasonography in lesions of the rotator cuff and biceps tendon. Acta Radiol 1989; 30: 253-5.
17 Ahuvuo J, Paavolainen P, Homstrom T. Ultrasonography of the tendons of the shoulder. Europ J Radiol 1989; 9 (01) 17-21.
18 Harcke HT, Grisson LE, Finkelstein MS. Evaluation of the musculoskeletal system with sonography. AJR 1988; 150: 1253-61.
19 Evans HE, Christensen GC. Miller’s anatomy of the dog. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1979: 340-52.
20 Piermattei DL, Greeley RG. An atlas of surgical approaches to the bones of the dog and cat. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1979: 72-7.
21 Hardy RM, Wallace LJ. Arthrocentesis and synovial membrane biopsy. Vet Clin North Am 1974; 4 (02) 449-62.
22 Neviaser TJ, Neviaser RJ, Neviaser JS. The four-in-one arthroplasty for the painful arc syndrome. Clin Orthop 1982; 163: 107-12.
23 Hall FM, Goldberg RP, Wyshak G, Kilcoyne RF. Shoulder arthrography: Comparison of morbidity after use of various contrast media. Radiology 1985; 154: 339-41.
24 Suter PE, Carb AV. Shoulder arthrography in dogs: Radiographic anatomy and clinical application. J Small Anim Pract 1969; 10: 407-13.
25 Perman V. Synovial fluid. In: Clinical biochemistry of domestic animals. Kaneko JJ. (ed). New York: Academic Press; 1980: 749-83.
26 Farin PU, Jaroma H, Jharju A, Soimakallio S. Shoulder impingement syndrome: Sono-graphic evaluation. Radiology 1990; 176: 845-9.
27 Ahuvuo J, Paavolainen P, Saarinen O. Shoulder arthrography with sodium meglumine metrizoate and iopamidol. Skeletal Radiol 1989; 18: 89-92.
28 Crass JR, van de Vegte GL, Harkavy LA. Tendon echogenicity: Ex vivo study. Radiology 1988; 167: 499-501.
29 Fornage BD. The hypoechoic normal tendon: A pitfall. J Ultrasound Med 1987; 6: 19-22.
30 Middleton WD. Status of rotator cuff sonography. Radiology 1989; 173: 307-9.