J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2018; 79(S 01): S1-S188
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1633440
Oral Presentations
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

A Cross-sectional Survey of the North American Skull Base Society on Vestibular Schwannoma: Current Practice Patterns of Vestibular Schwannoma Evaluation and Management in North America

Matthew L. Carlson
1   Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
,
Jamie J. Van Gompel
1   Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
,
Mark Wiet
2   Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, United States
,
Nicole M. Tombers
1   Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
,
Anand K. Devaiah
3   Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
,
Devyani Lal
1   Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
,
Jacques J. Morcos
4   University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States
,
Michael J. Link
1   Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
02 February 2018 (online)

 

Background Very few studies have examined vestibular schwannoma (VS) management trends across centers and between providers. The objective of the current study is to examine current practice trends, variance in treatment philosophies, and nuanced or controversial aspects of VS care across North America.

Methods Cross-sectional survey of North American Skull Base Society (NASBS) members who report regular involvement in VS care.

Results A total of 57 completed surveys were returned. Most respondents claimed to have over 20 years of experience and the majority reported working in an academic practice with an affiliated otolaryngology and/or neurosurgery residency program. Sixty-three percent of respondents claimed to evaluate VS patients in clinic with both an otolaryngologist and neurosurgeon involved. Eighty-six percent of respondents claimed to operate on VS with both an otolaryngologist and neurosurgeon involved, while only 18% of neurosurgeons and 9% of otolaryngologists performed surgery alone. There was a wide range in the number of cases evaluated at each center annually. Similarly, there was wide variation in the number of patients treated with microsurgery and radiation at each center. Additional details regarding management preferences for microsurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, stereotactic radiotherapy, and conservative observation are presented.

Conclusion Vestibular schwannoma management practices vary between providers and centers. Overall, most centers employ a multidisciplinary approach to management with collaboration between otolaryngology and neurosurgery. Overall, survey responses concur with previous studies suggesting a shift toward conservatism in management.