A Global Socio-economic-medico-legal Model for the Sustainability of Longitudinal Electronic Health Records

Summary

Objectives: This paper pursues the challenge of sustaining lifetime electronic health records (EHRs) based on a comprehensive socio-economic-medico-legal model. The notion of a lifetime EHR extends the emerging concept of a longitudinal and cross-institutional EHR and is invaluable information for increasing patient safety and quality of care.

Methods: The challenge is how to compile and sustain a coherent EHR across the lifetime of an individual. Several existing and hypothetical models are described, analyzed and compared in an attempt to suggest a preferred approach.

Results: The vision is that lifetime EHRs should be sustained by new players in the healthcare arena, who will function as independent health record banks (IHRBs). Multiple competing IHRBs would be established and regulated following preemptive legislation. They should be neither owned by healthcare providers nor by health insurer/payers or government agencies. The new legislation should also stipulate that the records located in these banks be considered the medico-legal copies of an individual’s records, and that healthcare providers no longer serve as the legal record keepers.

Conclusions: The proposed model is not centered on any of the current players in the field; instead, it is focussed on the objective service of sustaining individual EHRs, much like financial banks maintain and manage financial assets. This revolutionary structure provides two main benefits: 1) Healthcare organizations will be able to cut the costs of long-term record keeping, and 2) healthcare providers will be able to provide better care based on the availability of a lifelong EHR of their new patients.

Keywords

Social change - ethics - politics - economics - information medical record linkage

• References

• 1 Global Medic Personal Health File. Available at http://demo.wellnesscompanion.com/Demo/L2/PHF.htm. Accessed February 28 2005
• 2 Paggetti C, Mazzini C, Pierantoni M, Gualandi G, Schepel H. A European Health Card. European Parliament, Directorate General for Research, March 2001; 49
• 3 Global Medical Networks, Life-On-Key Available at http://www.lifeonkey.org/ Accessed February 28 2005
• 4 Shabo A. A Panel of Physicians and Legal Experts on the Patient’s Bill of Rights.. Haifa, Israel: The Rotary Club; February 13, 2001. (Internal report, in Hebrew)
• 5 Patient Rights The American Hospital Association. Available at http://www.aha.org Accessed October 1, 2001
• 6 Bourdon WT, Dubin SC. Long Term Care, General Liability and Professional Liability: Actuarial Analysis 2003 Available at http://www.ahca.org/news/nr030729.htm Accessed February 28, 2005
• 7 Tucker NH. Medicine: Art Versus Science. Jacksonville Medicine 1999 Available at http://www.dcmsonline.org/jax-medicine/1999jourals/december99/presmess.htm Accessed February 28, 2005
• 8 Azzone F. Medicine From Art to Science. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press; 1998: 210 (Veneto Institute of Sciences, Letters and Arts Series; Vol 1)
• 9 Pietschmann H. Medicine – A Discipline Between Art and Science. Brit Homeo Jnl 1983; 72 (03) 155-61.
• 10 Pradhan M. Analyzing the Art of Medicine. Australian Health Informatics Newsletter, February 1993
• 11 Shabo A, Vortman P, Robson B. Who’s Afraid of Lifetime Electronic Medical Records? TEHRE 2001. Proceedings of Towards Electronic Health Records Conference; November 14, 2001; London, UK
• 12 Giere W. Electronic Patient Information – Pioneers and Much More. A vision, lessons learned, and challenges. Methods Inf Med 2004; 43 (05) 543-52.
• 13 Hollerbach A, Brandner R, Bess A, Schmucker R, Bergh B. Electronically signed documents in health care – analysis and assessment of data formats and transformation. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44 (04) 520-7.
• 14 Haux R, Ammenwerth E, Herzog W, Knaup P. Health care in the information society. A prognosis for the year 2013. Int J Med Inf 2002; 66 (03) 3
• 15 van Bemmel JH, van Ginneken AM, Stam B, van Mulligen E. Virtual electronic patient records for shared care. MedInfo 1998; vol. 9, Pt 1 37-4. suppl
• 16 Naik G. England plans major revamp of health care. Wall Street Journal. December 3, 2003 Available at http://www.policyscience.net/england.health.pdf Accessed February 28 2005
• 17 NICTIZ – National IT Institute for Healthcare in the Netherlands Available at http://www.nictiz.nl Accessed February 28, 2005
• 18 Schabetsberger T, Gross E, Haux R, Lechleitner G, Schindelwig K, Stark C, Vogl R, Wilhelmy I, Pellizzari T. Approaches Towards a Regional, Shared Electronic Patient Record for Health Care Facilities of Different Health Care Organizations – ITStrategy and First Results. MedInfo. 2004
• 19 Vogl R, Schabetsberger T, Schindelwig K, Haux R, Shabo A. Regional Registries of Cross-Institutional Patient EHR as Forerunners of Independent EHR Banks. 2nd ICICTH – International Conference on Information Communication Technologies in Health. Greece, July 2004
• 20 Ramsaroop P, Ball MJ. The Bank of Health: A Model for More Useful Patient Records. MD Comput 2000; 17 (04) 45-8.
• 21 van Bemmel JH. Privacy matters: who has the right to patient data?. MD Comput 1999; 16 (05) 21-2.
• 22 Stefanelli M. Knowledge and process management in health care organizations. Methods Inf Med 2004; 43 (05) 525-35.
• 23 Pulse, The official publication of American Physicians Insurance Agency, Inc Altered Records Warning. First Quarter 2002; 2.
• 24 Harding J. The Ethics of Managed Care – Doing the Right Thing Might Take More Than Instinct. Postgrad Med 1997 102. 03 Available at http://www.Postgradmed.Com/Issues/1997/09_97/Ed_sep.Htm Accessed February 28 2005
• 25 Laine C, Davidoff F. Patient-Centered Medicine – A Professional Evolution. JAMA 1996; 275 (02) 152-6.
• 26 Slack WV. The Patient’s Right to Decide. Lancet 1977; 2: 240
• 27 Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Four Models of Doctor-Patient Relationship. JAMA 1992; 267: 2220-6.
• 28 Jones R. Consumer Health Informatics: The Need for Integration with Clinical Practice. 1999. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Primary Health Care Specialist Group of the British Computer Society, Cambridge, UK
• 29 Glick M. Symposium on Bio-Medical Ethics. 2001. The International Center for Ethics and Human Values. Inbal Hotel, May 16, 2001, Jerusalem, Israel
• 30 The Patient’s Bill of Rights The Medical Association in Israel. 1996 (In Hebrew.)
• 31 DICOM – Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine – Standard Specification Available at http://medical.nema.org/dicom.html Accessed February 28 2005
• 32 Health Informatics – Electronic healthcare record communication – Part 1: Extended architecture ENV 13606-1, Committee European Normalisation, CEN/TC 251 Health Informatics Technical Committee. 2000 Available at http://www.centc251.org/ Accessed February 28, 2005
• 33 HL7 (Health Level Seven), An ANSI-Accredited Standards Developing Organization Available at www.hl7.org Accessed February 28, 2005
• 34 The USA National Library of Medicine, UMLS Meta-Thesaurus Available at http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/about_umls.html Accessed February 28, 2005
• 35 McCray AT, Burgun A, Bodenreider O. Aggregating UMLS semantic types for reducing conceptual complexity. MedInfo 2001; 10 (Pt 1) 216-20.
• 36 Dolin H, Alschuler L, Boyer S, Beebe C. An Update on HL7’s XML-based Document Representation Standards 2000 Available at http://www.HL7.org/ Accessed (restricted to members) February 28, 2005
• 37 Shabo A. Structuring the Medical Narrative in Patient Records – A Further Step towards a Multi- Accessible EHR. Synopsis of the Patient Records Section. In Haux R, Kulikowski E. editors IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2004: Towards Clinical Bioinformatics. Stuttgart: Schattauer 2004; 317-20.
• 38 Knaup P, Mludek V, Wiedemann T, Bauer J, Haux R, Kim L. et al Integrating specialized application systems into hospital information systems – obstacles and factors for success. Stud Health Technol Inform 2000; 77: 890-4.
• 39 The MAX System for Managing the Patient’s Clinical Record – User Manual Version 6, October 1998. MAX Software, Haifa, Israel
• 40 HL7 EHR Functional Model (DSTU – Draft Standard for Trial Use) Available at http://www.hl7.org/ehr/ Accessed February 28 2005
• 41 Shabo A. Integrated EHR: The Final Frontier. BioIT World, November 2003. Available at http://www.bio-itworld.com/archive/111403/strategic_ehr.html Accessed February 28, 2005