Design and Introduction of an Electronic Patient Record: How to Involve Users?

Summary

Objectives: Two forms of participatory design (PD) – management-dominated and end-users focused – are described in the design and introduction of an electronic patient record (EPR) for a mental health care centre.

Methods: Qualitative research methods were used to achieve a ‘fine-grained’ insight into the EPR development process and its impacts. These methods included interviews, document study and observation of project group meetings.

Results: Management-dominated PD is highly structured, led by managers and centred around rationalisation of work. End-user focused PD is more bottom-up oriented. Central in this approach are users’ working patterns and user needs. In the case described, both forms actually lead to a poorly functioning EPR. It is explained why these results could be expected.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest not to reject PD, but to find a more appropriate balance between the two forms of PD.

Keywords

User-involvement - participatory design (PD) - health care - implementation - electronic patient record (EPR)

• References

• 1 Atkinson CJ, Peel VJ. Transforming a hospital through growing, not building, an electronic patient record system. Meth Inf Med 1998; 37: 285-93.
• 2 Hartswood M. et al. Being there and doing IT in the workplace, a case study of a co-development approach in healthcare. Participatory Design Conference. 2000
• 3 Berg M. Patient care information systems and health care work: a sociotechnical approach. Int J Med Inf 1999; 55: 87-101.
• 4 Berg M. et al. De nacht schreef rood, informatisering van zorgpraktijken. Studie 37. Den Haag: Rathenau Instituut; 1998
• 5 Suchman L. Plans and situated Action, the problem of human-machine interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987
• 6 Asaro PM. Transforming society by transforming technology, the science and politics of participatory design. Accounting, Management & Information Technologies 2000; 10: 257-90.
• 7 Vimarlund V, Timpka T. Design Participation as an insurance, risk-management and end-user participation in the development of information systems in health organizations. Meth Inf Med 2002; 41: 76-80.
• 8 Hartswood M. et al. Making a case in medical Work, implications for the electronic medical record. Comput Supp Coop Work; forthcoming.
• 9 Sjöberg C, Timpka T. Participatory design of information systems in health care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998; 5: 177-83.
• 10 Avison DE, Fitzgerald G. Information systems development. In: Currie WL, Galliers RD. editors. Rethinking management information systems: an interdisciplinary perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999. pp. 251-78.
• 11 Hayes N, Walsham G. Competing interpretations of computer-supported cooperative work in organizational contexts. Organization 2000; 7: 49-67.
• 12 Berg M. Implementing information systems in health care organizations; myths and challenges. Int J Med Inf 2001; 64: 143-56.