CISMeF: A Structured Health Resource Guide

Abstract:

In 1999, the Internet has become a major source of health information. The objective of CISMeF is to catalogue and index the main French-speaking health resources. In September 1999, the number of indexed resources totaled over 7,100 with a mean of 75 new sites per week. CISMeF uses two standard tools for organizing information: the Medline bibliographic database MeSH thesaurus and the Dublin Core metadata format. Resources included in CISMeF are described by the following: title, author or creator, subject and keywords, description, publisher, date, resource type, format, identifier, and language. To index resources, CISMeF uses five levels of hierarchy: “meta-term”, category, keyword, subheading, and resource type. CISMeF contains a thematic index, including medical specialities and an alphabetic index. CISMeF respects the Net Scoring, criteria to assess the quality of health information on the Internet. The CISMeF project offers a valuable tool for the French-speaking health community: 2,500 computer users visit the Web site each working day.

Keywords:

Abstracting - Indexing - Catalogue - Internet - Vocabulary

• REFERENCES

• 1 Schatz BR. Information Retrieval in Digital Libraries: Bringing Search to the Net. Science 1997; 275: 327-34.
• 2 Flannery MR. Cataloging Internet resources. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1995; 83: 211-5.
• 3 Darmoni SJ, Thirion B. Indexing the Web? A comparative study of three medical Web servers on the Internet: Cliniweb, “Diseases, Disorders and Related Topics”. Omni. In: Proceeding of the 1st European Congress of the Internet in Medicine . 1996: 5-6. Unpublished. Available from Internet: <http://www.mednet.org.uk/mednet/dl4.htm>.
• 4 National Library of Medicine.. Fact Sheet Medline. 6 July 1998 [Web document, accessed 11 Jan 1999] Available from Internet: <http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/medline.html>
• 5 Weibel S, Juha H. DC-5: The Helsinki Meta-data Workshop; A Report on the Workshop and Subsequent Developments. D-Lib Magazine. 1998 February. Available from Internet: <http://www.dlib.org/dlib/february98/02weibel.html>.
• 6 Centrale Santé.. Net Scoring: critères de qualité de l’information de santé sur l’Internet. 20 Apr 1998 [Web document, accessed 27 Apr 1999]. Available from Internet: <http://www.chu-rouen.fr/dsii/publi/critqualv2.html>.
• 7 Ambre J, Guard R, Perveiler FM, Renner J, Rippen H. Health Information Technology Institute. Working Draft White Paper: Criteria for Assessing the Quality of Health Information 8 Apr. 1999 [Web document, accessed 27 Apr 1999]. Available from Internet: <http://hitiweb.mitetretek.org/hswg/>.
• 8 Thirion B, Darmoni SJ. A simplified access to “MeSH Tree Structures” for Health professionals and patients, our new “end-users” on the Internet. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1999; 87: 480.
• 9 Ingwersen P. The calculation of WEB impact factor. J Documentation 1998; 54: 236-43.
• 10 National Library of Medicine.. Fact Sheet UMLS Metathesaurus. 12 Aug 1998 [Web document, accessed 27 Apr 1999]. Available from Internet: <http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/online_indexing_system.html>
• 11 Hersh WR, Brown KE, Donohoe LC, Campbell EM, Horacek AE. CliniWeb: managing clinical information on the World Wide Web. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1996; 3: 273-80.
• 12 Norman F. Organising Medical Networks’ information (OMNI). Med Inf 1998; 23: 43-51.
• 13 Boyer C, Baujard O, Baujard V, Aurel S, Selby M, Appel RD. Health On the Net: automated database of Health and medical information. Int J Med Inform 1997; 47: 27-9.