Appropriateness and Necessity Research on the Internet: Using a “Second Opinion System”

Abstract

Appropriateness and necessity research of various procedures in medicine may be the most complex field of innovation in healthcare and technology assessment. Nevertheless, the appropriateness of the indication of any medical intervention is probably more important than the outcome since even ideal quality components of structures, processes and outcomes become irrelevant without a proper indication. The first part of our appropriateness initiative in interventional cardiology and gynecology was to formulate guidelines. To define the appropriateness for coronary angiography, coronary revascularization and hysterectomy, literature-based consensus methods were used. The second part was to disseminate the guidelines in a user-friendly manner via the Internet. Therefore, we relied on a system-driven query facility for propositional (experts) rules. The next part of the appropriateness initiative may be a user-friendly Internet-based data collection system to validate the national accepted guidelines. Most important may be that only data that is needed can be collected using a refined database technology. The described Second Opinion System can be found under: http://sos.inf.ethz.ch. Research on indications with data on clinical outcome may open new opportunities to validate indication guidelines using Inter-net/database technology for data analysis and browsing of decision graphs concerning clinical decision-making. This new technology facilitates the evaluation of appropriateness and necessity criteria in combination with clinical outcomes.

Keywords

Appropriateness - Decision-making - Internet - Multidimensional Models - Metadata Driven - Querying

• REFERENCES

• 1 Schilling J, Faisst K, Wyss P, Cranovsky R, Gutzwiller F. Angemessenheit und Notwendigkeit häufiger Behandlungen . Gesundheitsökonomie & Qualitätsmanagement 1997; 5: 151-5.
• 2 Brook R, Lohr K. Will we need to ration effective health care? Issues in Science and Technology. 1986; Fall 68-77.
• 3 Brook R, Chassin M, Fink A. et al. A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies . Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1986; 2: 53.
• 4 Balard DJ. The RAND/AMA/AMCC Clinical appropriateness initiative: Insights for multi-site appropriateness studies derived from the abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery project . Int J Qual Health Care 1994; 6: 187-98.
• 5 Black N. Research, audit and education. Br Med J 1992; 304: 351-407.
• 6 Cain K, Diehr P. The relationship between small area relationship between small-area variations in the use of health care services and inappropriate use: a commentary . Health Serv Res 1993; 28: 411.
• 7 Chassin M, Kosecoff J, Park R. et al. A RAND Corporation Research Study. The Appropriateness of Selected Medical and Surgical Procedures Relationships to Geographical Variations . Ann Arbor; Association for Health Services Research and Health Administration Press: 1989
• 8 Davidson G. Does inappropriate use explain small-area variations in the use of health care services? (a critique) . Health Serv Res 1993; 28: 389
• 9 Kassirer JPM. The quality of care and the quality of measuring it . New Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1263-65.
• 10 Park R. Does inappropriate use explain small-area variations in the use of health care services? (a reply) . Health Serv Res 1993; 28: 401.
• 11 Conen D. Die Qualität ärztlicher Leistungen . Bern: Hans Huber; 1984
• 12 Schilling J, Cranovsky R, Gutzwiller F. Qualitätsmanagement und Qualitätssicherung: die Terminologie zum Strukturwandel in der Medizin. Schweiz. Rundschau für Medizin 1996; 85: 714-20.
• 13 Swiss Society of Cardiology.. Results of a Swiss Consensus Conference on Coronary Angiography . Schweiz Med Wschr 1997; 127: 1179-90.
• 14 Swiss Society of Cardiology.. Results of a Swiss Consensus Conference on Coronary Revascularization . Schweiz Med Wschr 1997; 127: 1191-210.
• 15 Schilling J, Wyss P, Faisst K. et al. Swiss Consensus Guidelines for Hysterectomy . Int J Gynecol Obstet 1999 in press.
• 16 Vader JP, Burnand B, Froehlich F. et al. Appropriateness of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: comparison of American and Swiss criteria . Int J Qual Health Care 1997; 9: 87-92.
• 17 Fröhlich F, Pache I, Burnand B. et al. Underutilization of upper gastrointestinal endo-scopy . Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 690-7.
• 18 Fröhlich F, Burnand B, Pache I. et al. Overuse of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in a country with open-access endoscopy: a prospective study in primary care . Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 1997; 45: 13-9.
• 19 Gonvers JJ, Burnand B, Froehlich F. et al. Appropriateness and diagnostic yield of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in an open-access endoscopy unit . Endoscopy 1996; 28: 661-6.
• 20 Larequi-Lauber T, Vader JP, Burnand B. et al. Appropriateness of indications for surgery of lumbar disc hernia and spinal stenosis . Spine 1997; 22: 203-9.
• 21 Leape LL, Hilborne LH. Coronary Artery Bypass Graft . Santa Monica: RAND; 1991
• 22 Leape LL, McGlynn EA. Coronary angiography – Ratings of appropriateness and necessity by a Canadian Panel . Santa Monica: RAND; 1993
• 23 Hilborne LH, Leape LL. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty . Santa Monica: RAND; 1991
• 24 Bernstein SJ, Laouri M. Coronary Angiography – A literature review and ratings of appropriateness and necessity . Santa Monica: RAND; 1992
• 25 Glode LM. Challenges and opportunities of the Internet for medical oncology . J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 2181-6.
• 26 Blumenthal DM. The future of quality measurement and Management in a transforming health care system . JAMA 1997; 278: 1622-5.