Role of the Electronic Patient Record in the Development of General Practice in the Netherlands

Abstract

From the end of the seventies practice computer systems have been introduced in Dutch general practice. In 1998 90% of the GPs had a practice computer and 60% used it for medical purposes, with good patient acceptance. Collaboration between pioneer GPs, professional organizations, academic institutions and software manufacturers has been of decisive importance. While the practice computer is early recognized as a powerful tool for administrative purposes, it is increasingly supporting clinical and preventive care, quality of care improvement, clinical training of students and vocational training of general practice trainees. Also for scientific research and practice supporting research, automatization has proven to be innovating. Much attention is paid to designing valid databases and database-related research. In addition, practice automatization has opened new perspectives for health policy and management. Further development of technical and methodological issues is needed, and, very importantly, of patients‘ and consumers’ involvement. EPR technology in general practice does not optimally work without good numerator and denominator data, and a good quality patient-doctor relationship over time. While the EPR is a useful tool to facilitate a better performance, it may enable the doctor to focus more on the health care essentials.

Keywords

General Practice - Computer - Research Networks - Quality of Care - Electronic Patient Record

• REFERENCES

• 1 Höppener P. Automatisering en wetenschappelijk onderzoek in de huisartspraktijk. De mogelijkheden en merites van een nieuw instrument. Thesis, University of Maastricht.; Maastricht: 1990
• 2 Meyboom WA. Verslaglegging van huisartsgeneeskundig handelen. ISBN 90-9003916-3. Thesis, University of Nijmegen.; Nijmegen: 1991
• 3 Rethans JJ, Höppener P, Wolfs G, Diederiks J. Do personal computers make doctors less personal?. Br Med J 1988; 296: 1446-8.
• 4 Quaak MJ. Computer assisted medical history taking. Thesis, Erasmus University.; Rotterdam: 1988
• 5 Herk van E. A diagnostic decision support system for general practice. Thesis, Erasmus University; Rotterdam: 1994
• 6 Dupuits F. Diagnostic Decision Support for General Practioners. ISBN 90-5681-021-9. Thesis, University of; Maastricht: 1997
• 7 Branger PJ. Computer-based Shared Care. A Study on Electronic Data Interchange Applied to Diabetes Care. Thesis, Erasmus University; Rotterdam: 1995
• 8 Branger PJ, Wouden van der JC, Schudel BR, Verboog E, Duisterhout JS, Lei van der J, Bemmel van JH. Electronic communication between providers of primary and secondary care. Br Med J 1992; 305: 1068-70.
• 9 Govaert ThME, Dinant GJ, Knottnerus JA. Vaccinatie tegen influenza in een huisartspraktijk. Huisarts Wet 1991; 34: 478-81.
• 10 Knottnerus JA, Grol R, Metsemakers JFM. Computerization of General Practices and Quality Control. Blood glucose regulation in type 2 diabetes investigated in the Registration Network Family Practices. Fam Pract 1992; 9: 353-6.
• 11 Metsemakers JFM, Bouhuijs PAJ, SnellenBalendong HAM. Do we teach what we preach? Comparing the content of a problem-based medical curriculum with primary health care data. Fam Pract 1991; 8: 195-201.
• 12 Lei J van der. Critiquing based on computer-stored medical records. Thesis, Erasmus University; Rotterdam: 1991
• 13 Winkens RAG. Improving test ordering in general practice. Thesis, University of; Maastricht: 1997
• 14 Knottnerus JA. Research in general practice. Lancet 1996; 347: 1236-8.
• 15 Metsemakers JFM, Höppener P, Knottnerus JA, Kocken RJJ, Limonard CBG. The Registration Network Family Practices: a computerized health information system in the Netherlands. Br J Gen Pract 1992; 42: 102-6.
• 16 Schouten LJ, Höppener P, Brandt van den PA, Knottnerus JA, Jager JJ. Completeness of cancer registration in Limburg, the Netherlands. Int J Epidemiol 1993; 22: 369-76.
• 17 Metsemakers JFM, Lisdonk van de E, Limonard CBG. Huisartsgeneeskundige registratiesystemen in Nederland. University of Maastricht:; 1994
• 18 Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu.. Volksgezondheid Toekomst Ver-kenning 1997. Utrecht: Elsevier/De Tijdstroom; 1997
• 19 Knottnerus JA. Diagnostic prediction rules: principles, requirements, and pitfalls. Primary Care 1995; 22: 341-63.