Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 1998; 37(04/05): 527-539
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634544
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH

Concept-oriented Standardization and Statistics-oriented Classification: Continuing the Classification versus Nomenclature Controversy

J. Ingenerf
1   GSF – National Research Center for Environment and Health, Neuherberg
,
W. Giere
2   J. W. Goethe – University Frankfurt/Main, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
15 February 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Nowadays, most activities on controlled medical vocabularies focus on the provision of a sufficient atomic-level granularity for representing clinical data. Amongst others, clinical vocabularies should be concept oriented, compositional and should also reject “Not Elsewhere Classified” [1]. We strongly share the opinion that there is a need to deal with serious deficits of existing manually created vocabularies and with new demands for computer-based advanced processing and exchange of medical language data. However, we do not share the opinion that methodological requirements like observational and structural comparability needed for sound statistics should not be included in desiderata of controlled medical vocabularies. Statistical-oriented classifications are not developed for representing detailed clinical data but for providing purposedependent classes where cases of interest are assigned uniquely. Either statistical classifications are not included into the set of controlled medical vocabularies in the sense of Cimino, or his desiderata are misleading. We argue that statistical classifications should be linked to (formal) concept systems, but again this linkage does not change their different natures. With this article we continue the “classification versus nomenclature” controversy referring to Cote [2].

Keywords

Medical Informatics - Controlled Vocabulary - Documentation - Data Interpretation/Statistical
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Cimino JJ. Desiderata for Controlled Medical Vocabularies in the Twenty-First Century. Meth Inform Med 1998; 37: 394-403.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Coté RA. Editorial: Ending the classification versus nomenclature controversy. Medical Informatics 1983; 8: 1-4.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Chute CG, Cohn SP, Campbell KE. et al. The content coverage of clinical classifications. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 1996; 3 (3) 224-33.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Cimino JJ. Review paper: coding systems in health care. Methods of Information in Medicine 1996; 35 (4-5) 273-84.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Chute CG, Coté RA. Computerized Natural Medical Language Processing for Knowledge Representation: Overview of IMIA Working Group Conference, Geneva, September 1988. In: Barber B, Cao D, Gin D. et al. eds. Proc. of the MEDINFO 89 – 6th International Conference on Medical Informatics in Peking/Singapure. Amsterdam: North-Holland; 1989: 878-81.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 6 van Bemmel JH. Handbook of Medical Informatics. In: Houten/Diegem: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum; 1997
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 7 Leiner F, Haux R. Systematic Planning of Clinical Documentation. Methods of Information in Medicine 1996; 35: 25-34.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Baud RH, Rassinoux AM, Wagner JC. et al. Representing Clinical Narratives Using Conceptual Graphs. Methods of Information in Medicine 1995; 34 (1/2) 176-86.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Wingert F, Rothwell DJ, Coté RA. Automated indexing into SNOMED and ICD. In: Proc. of the IMIA-WG6 International Working Conference in Geneva, 1988. Scherrer J-R, Coté RA, Mandil SH. eds. Amsterdam: North-Holland; 1989: 201-39.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 10 Moorman PW, van Ginneken AM, van der Lei J, van Bemmel JH. A model for structured data entry based on explicit descriptional knowledge. Methods of Information in Medicine 1994; 33: 454-63.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Nowlan WA, Rector AL. Medical Knowledge Representation and Predictive Data Entry. In: Proc. of the AIME 91 – 3rd Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Europe. Stefanelli M, Hasman A, Fieschi M. et al. eds. Berlin: Springer; 1991: 105-16.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 12 Feinstein AR. Scientific Standards in Epidemiologic Studies of the Menace of Daily Life. Science 1988; 242: 1257-63.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Giere W, Schuster RW. Informationsaustausch zwischen Krankenhaus und Praxis. Der Praktische Arzt, Arzt für Allgemeinmedizin 1975; 8: 1-4.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 UICC. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. (edited by Hermanek P, Sobin LH. ) Berlin: Springer; 1987
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 15 Giere W. The BAIK Model. In: Open Systems in Medicine. Fleck E. ed. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1995: 24-34.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 16 Wüster E. Begriffs- und Themaklassifikation: Unterschiede in ihrem Wesen und in ihrer Anwendung. Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 1971 22. (3/4) 98-104 143-50.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 National Library of Medicine (NLM). Medical Subject Headings (MeSH): Tree Structures (Thesaurus for searching in the onlinedatabase “MEDLINE”). Bethesda, MD: Nlm-Med-85-03; 1985
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 18 Ingenerf J. Taxonomic vocabularies in medicine: the intention of usage determines different established structures. In: Proc. of the MED INFO 95 – 8th Int. Conf. on Medical Informatics in Vancouver, BC, Canada. Greenes RA, Peterson HE, Protti DJ. eds. Amsterdam: North-Holland; 1995: 136-9.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 19 Frutiger P. Language and knowledge interfaces: progress towards IMIA's WG6 recommendations. In: Proc. of the M ED INFO 86 – 5th International Conference on Medical Informatics in Washington, DC. Salamon R, Blum BI, Jorgensen M. eds. Amsterdam: North-Holland; 1986: 76-80.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 20 Zaiss A, Schulz S, Graubner B, Klar R. Conversion table between ICD-9 and ICD-10. In: Proc. of the MIE 96 – 12th International Conference on Medical Informatics in Europe in Copenhagen (Denmark). Brender J, Christensen JP, Scherrer J-R. et al. eds. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1996: 193-7.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 21 Rector AL, Nowlan WA, Kay S. Foundations for an electronic medical record. Methods of Information in Medicine 1991; 30: 179-86.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Haux R. Knowledge-based decision support for diagnosis and therapy: on the multiple usability of patient data. Methods of Information in Medicine 1989; 28: 69-77.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Wingert F. Automated Mapping of ICD into SNOMED. In: Orthner HFBBI. ed. 1989: 199-204.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Coté RA. International Classification for Health and Disease: the expandable common core concept. Medical Informatics 1983; 8: 5-16.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Rothwell DJ. SNOMED based knowledge representation. Methods of Information in Medicine 1995; 34: 209-13.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Rector AL, Nowlan WA, Kay S. Goals for concept representation in the GALEN project. In: Proc. of the SCAMC 93 – 17th Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, Washington DC. Safran C. ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1993: 414-8.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 27 Campbell KE, Das AK, Musen MA. A logical foundation for representation of clinical data. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 1994; 1 (3) 218-32.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Ingenerf J. On the relationship between description logics and conceptual graphs – with some references to the medical domain. In: Proc. of the 19th Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl) in Basel, Switzerland, March 1995. Bock HH, Posasek W. eds. Berlin: Springer; 1996: 355-69.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 29 Doyle J, Patii RS. Two theses of knowledge representation: language restrictions, taxonomic classification, and the utility of representation services. Artificial Intelligence 1991; 48: 261-97.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Ceusters W, Deville G, Buekens F. The Chimera of Purpose- and Language Independent Concept Systems in Health Care. In: Proc. of the MIE 94 – 12th International Conference on Medical Informatics in Europe, Lisbon (Portugal). Barahona P, Veloso M, Bryant J. eds. 1994: 208-12.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 31 Rector AL. Coordinating Taxonomies: Key To Re-usable Concept Representations. In: Proc. of the AIME 95 – 5th Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Europe. New York: Barahona P, Stefanelli M, Wyatt J. eds. Springer; 1995: 17-28.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 32 Hirs WM. The use of terminological principles and methods in medicine. In: Proc. of the MEDINFO 92 – 7th International Conference on Medical Informatics in Geneva Palexpo, Switzerland. Lun KC, Degoulet P, Piemme TE. et al. eds. Amsterdam: North-Holland; 1992: 1452-7.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 33 Thurmayr R. Use of a Conversion Table from ICD/E-Code to SNOMED. In: Proc. of the IFIP-IMIA WG6 International Working Conference in Ottawa, 1984. Coté RA, Protti DJ, Scherrer J-R. eds. Amsterdam: North-Holland; 1985: 333-7.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 34 Rodgers FE, Solomon WD, Rector AL. et al. Rubrics to Dissections to GRAIL to Classifications. In: Proc. of the Medical Informatics Europe (MIE) '97. Pappas C, Maglaveras N, Scherrer J-R. eds. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1997: 241-5.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 35 Coté RA, Rothwell DJ, Palotay JL. et al. The Systematized Nomenclature of Human and Veterinary Medicine – SNOMED International (4 volumes). Chicago: College of American Pathologists; 1993
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 36 Kolodzig C, Diekmann F. Diagnosenkodierung: Nutzung von DV-Systemen (wie ID DIACOS). Deutsches Ärzteblatt 1992; 89 (3) 92-6.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Assimacopoulos A, Le Coultre C, Griesser V, Scherrer J-R. Nomenclature or Classification? – Eighteen Months of Interactive Coding of Diagnosis and Surgical Procedures Within the Integrated Hospital Information System (HIS) DIOGENE. In: Proc. of the MEDINFO 86 – 5 th International Conference on Medical Informatics in Washington, DC. Salamon R, Blum BI, Jorgensen M. eds. Amsterdam: North-Holland; 1986: 865-9.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 38 Satomura Y, do Amarai MB. Automated diagnostic indexing by natural language processing. Medical Informatics 1992; 17: 149-63.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Delamarre D, Burgun A, Seka LP, Le Beux P. Automated Coding of Patient Discharge Summaries Using Conceptual Graphs. Methods of Information in Medicine 1995; (4): 345-51.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Rector AL. Faithfulness or comparability. Methods of Information in Medicine 1996; (3): 218-9.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 ISO 1087. Terminology – Vocabulary. Berlin: Beuth; 1990
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 42 ISO 5127/6. Documentation and information (Vocabulary), Part 6: Documentary languages. Berlin: Beuth; 1983
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 43 Rescher N. Introduction to Logic. New York: St. Martin's Press; 1964
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 44 World Health Organization (WHO). Manual of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries, and Causes of Death – Ninth Revision of the International Classification of Diseases. Geneva: WHO; 1977
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 45 Coté RA, Rothwell DJ. The classification – nomenclature issues in medicine: a return to natural language. Medical Informatics 1989; 14 (1) 25-41.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 CEN-ENV-12264. Medical Informatics – Categorical structure of systems of concepts – Model for representation of semantics. Brussels: CEN; 1995
    Search in Google Scholar