Abstract:
Heathfield and Wyatt’s article in the current issue of Methods opens a debate about the status of Medical Informatics as a discipline and as a profession. While the desire for more professionalism of Medical Informatics is laudable, certain points in the article are debatable. Based on widely circulated definitions of profession and science, on the thousands of people who make medical informatics their main occupation, and on at least 10,000 peer-reviewed publications, the authors argue that the discipline is already a profession, albeit a fledgling one. Contrary to the positions of Heathfield and Wyatt, exemplary, long-lasting medical informatics applications demonstrate that the best artifacts of medical informatics already meet the most important requirement for professionalism, i. e., the commitment to clients and the public to perform a socially useful function.
Keywords:
Medical Informatics - Professionalism - System Development - Education
