Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 1995; 34(05): 434-440
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634626
Editorial Commentary
Schattauer GmbH

Potholes in the Road to Professionalism in Medical Informatics

D. A. Giuse
1   Division of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
,
R. A. Miller
1   Division of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
17 February 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract:

Heathfield and Wyatt’s article in the current issue of Methods opens a debate about the status of Medical Informatics as a discipline and as a profession. While the desire for more professionalism of Medical Informatics is laudable, certain points in the article are debatable. Based on widely circulated definitions of profession and science, on the thousands of people who make medical informatics their main occupation, and on at least 10,000 peer-reviewed publications, the authors argue that the discipline is already a profession, albeit a fledgling one. Contrary to the positions of Heathfield and Wyatt, exemplary, long-lasting medical informatics applications demonstrate that the best artifacts of medical informatics already meet the most important requirement for professionalism, i. e., the commitment to clients and the public to perform a socially useful function.

Keywords:

Medical Informatics - Professionalism - System Development - Education
 

  • References

  • 1 Heathfield HA, Wyatt J. The Road to Professionalism in Medical Informatics: A Proposal for Debate. Meth Inform Med 1995; 34: 426-33.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Gove PB. (editor). Webster’s Third New International Dictionary of the English Language. Unabridged. Merriam-Webster Inc; Springfield MA: 1986
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Collen MF. A History of Medical Informatics in the United States. American Medical Informatics Association; Indianapolis IN: 1995: 38-43.
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Blois MS, Shortliffe EH. The computer meets medicine: emergence of a discipline. In Shortliffe EH, Perrault LE. (eds). Medical informatics: Computer applications in health care. Addison-Wesley; Menlo Park, CA: 1990: 3-36.
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Conant JB. Science and Common Sense. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1951
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Hempel CG. Philosophy of Natural Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1966
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Kuhn TS. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Second Edition, enlarged. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press; 1970
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Bacon F. The New Organon. Aphorisms. Book One, VI, VIII, XLV. 1620. IN: The New Organon. Anderson FH. (editor). Bobbs-Merrill Inc; Indianapolis, IN: 1960
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Haynes RB, McKibbon KA, Walker CJ. et al. Computer Searching of the Medical Literature: An evaluation of MEDLINE searching systems. Ann Intern Med 1985; 103: 812-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kingsland LD, 3d Harbourt AM, Syed EJ, Schuyler PL. Coach: applying UMLS Knowledge sources in an expert searcher environment. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 1993; 81: 178-83.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Haynes RB, Walker CJ, McKibbon KA, Johnston ME, Willan AR. Performances of 27 MEDLINE systems tested by searches with clinical questions. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994; 1: 285-95.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Cox BJ. Object-oriented programming. An evolutionary approach. Reading, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley; 1987
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Glass RL. The software-research crisis. IEEE Software 1994; 11: 42-7.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Wayt Gibbs W. Software’s chronic crisis. Scientific American (Int Ed) 1994; 271: 72-81.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Brooks Jr FP. No silver bullet; essence and accidents of software engineering. Computer 1987; 20: 10-9.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Osheroff JA, Forsythe DE, Buchanan BG, Bankowitz RA, Blumenfeld BH, Miller RA. Physicians’ Information Needs: Analysis of Questions Posed during Clinical Teaching. Ann Intern Med 1991; 114: 576-81.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Stinson ER, Mueller DA. Survey of Health Professionals’ Information Habits and Needs – Conducted Through Personal Interviews. JAMA 1980; 243: 140-3.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Weinberg AD, Ullian L, Richards WD, Cooper P. Informal Advice- and Information-Seeking between Physicians. J Med Educ 1981; 56: 174-80.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Forsythe DE, Buchanan BG, Osheroff JE, Miller RA. Expanding the Concept of Medical Information: An Observational Study of Physicians’ Information Needs. Comput Biomed Res 1992; 25: 181-200.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kuperman GJ, Gardner RM, Pryor TA. HELP: A dynamic hospital information system. New York: Springer Verlag; 1991
    Google Scholar
  • 21 McDonald CJ. Protocol-based computer reminders, the quality of care and the nonperfectability of man. N Engl J Med 1976; 295: 1351-5.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 McDonald CJ. Action-oriented decisions in ambulatory medicine. Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc; Chicago IL: 1981
    Google Scholar
  • 23 McDonald CJ, Tierney WM. et al. The Regenstrief Medical Record System. In Ozbolt J. (ed): Proc 19th Annu Sympos Comput Applic Med Care. Philadelphia, PA: Hanley Belfus; 1994
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Bleich HL, Beckley RF. et al. Clinical computing in a teaching hospital. N Engl J Med 1985; 312: 756-64.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Borst F, Griesse V. et al. Fifteen years of medical encoding in the Diogene HIS. In Greenes, Peterson, Protti, eds. Proceedings of the Eighth World Congress on Medical Informatics 1995; 43-6.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Yount RJ, Vries JK, Councill CD. The Medical Archival System: an Information Retrieval System based on Distributed Parallel Processing. Information Processing & Management 1991; 27: 379-89.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Miller RA. Medical Diagnostic Decision Support Systems – Past, Present, and Future: A Threaded Bibliography and Commentary. JAMIA 1994; 1: 8-27.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Ledley RS, Lusted LB. Reasoning Foundations of Medical Diagnosis. Science 1959; 130: 9-1.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Feinstein AR. Clinical biostatistics. XXXIX. The haze of Bayes, the aerial palaces of decision analysis, and the computerized Ouija board. Clin Biostat 1973; 21: 482-96.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Blois MS. Judgment and Computers. N Engl J Med 1980; 303: 192-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Reichertz PL. Medical Informatics – Fiction or Reality?. Meth Inform Med 1980; 19: 11-5.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Yu VL. Conceptual obstacles in computerized medical diagnosis. J Med Phil 1983; 8: 67-75.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Miller RA. Internist-1/CADUCEUS: Problems Facing Expert Consultant Programs. Meth Inform Med 1984; 23: 9-14.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Miller RA, Pople HE, Myers JD. INTERNIST-I, an experimental computer-based diagnostic consultant for general internal medicine. N Engl J Med 1982; 307: 468-76.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Minsky ML, Papert S. Perceptrons; an introduction to computational geometry. MIT Press; Cambridge, Mass: 1969
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Hinton GE. Connectionist learning procedures. Artif Intell 1989; 40: 185-235.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Shaw M. Informatics for a new century: computing education for the 1990s and beyond. Education and Computing 1991; 7: 9-17.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Mead NR, Lawlis PK. Software engineering: graduate-level courses for AFIT professional continuing education. Proc Software Engineering Education, SEI Conference 1991. Springer-Verlag; 1991: 114-26.
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Miller RA, Schaffner KF, Meisel A. Ethical and Legal Issues Related to the Use of Computer Programs in Clinical Medicine. Ann Intern Med 1985; 102: 529-36.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Young FE. Validation of medical software: present policy of the Food and Drug Administration. Ann Intern Med 1987; 106: 628-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar