Abstract
Two methods for diagnostic classification of the electrocardiogram are described: a heuristic one and a statistical one. In the heuristic approach, the cardiologist provides the knowledge to construct a classifier, usually a decision tree. In the statistical approach, probability densities of diagnostic features are estimated from a learning set of ECGs and multivariate techniques are used to attain diagnostic classification. The relative merits of both approaches with respect to criteria selection, comprehensibility, flexibility, combined diseases, and performance are described. Optimization of heuristic classifiers is discussed. It is concluded that heuristic classifiers are more comprehensible than statistical ones; encounter less difficulties in dealing with combined categories; are flexible in the sense that new categories may readily be added or that existing ones may be refined stepwise. Statistical classifiers, on the other hand, are more easily adapted to another operating environment and require less involvement of cardiologists. Further research is needed to establish differences in performance between both methods. In relation to performance testing the issue is raised whether the ECG should be classified using as much prior information as possible, or whether it should be classified on itself, explicitly discarding information other than age and sex, while only afterwards other information will be used to reach a final diagnosis. Consequences of taking one of both positions are discussed.
Key-Words
ECG Classification - Optimization - Gold Standard
