Methods Inf Med 1994; 33(03): 302-303
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1635021
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH

From Nursing Information Systems to Patient Information Systems

P. M. Coward
1   Greater Victoria Hospital Society, Victoria, B. C, Canada
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
09 February 2018 (online)

Abstract:

Clinical information systems, developed for specific disciplines, reinforce the fragmentation of patient care and fail to support integrated, patient centered approaches. Fundamental restructuring of systems development is required to prepare the health care system and the practice of nursing for the future.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Lancaster L. Nursing information systems in the year 2000: Another perspective. Computers in Nursing 1993; 11: 3-5.
  • 2 Prescott PA. Shortage of professional nursing practice: A reframing of the shortage problem. Heart and Lung 1989; 18: 436-43.
  • 3 Aiken LH. Charting the future of hospital nursing. Image: J Nursing Scholarship 1990; 22: 72-8.
  • 4 Prescott PA, Phillips CY, Ryan JW, Thompson KO. Changing how nurses spend their time. Image: J Nursing Scholarship 1991; 23: 23-8.
  • 5 Mowry M, Korpman R. Evaluating automated information systems. Nursing Economics 1987; 05: 7-12.
  • 6 Adaskin E, Hughes L, McLean M. Impact of computerization on Nursing. Final report to Technology Impact Program, Labour Canada. 1992: 1-10.
  • 7 Desbourough K. Infostat. Ottawa: The National Federation of Nursing Unions; 1987
  • 8 Sorensen L. The promises of computerization: Nurses’ work experiences. In: Proc Ann Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1989: 815-9.
  • 9 Burkes M. Identifying and relating nurses’ attitudes toward computer use. Computers in Nursing 1991; 09: 190-201.
  • 10 Schlehofer GB. Informatics: Managing clinical operations data. Nursing Management 1992; 23: 36-8.