Methods Inf Med 1994; 33(05): 448-453
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1635057
Modelling
Schattauer GmbH

Modeling the Relational Complexities of Symptoms

R. H. Dolin
1   Southern California Kaiser-Permanente, Anaheim CA, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
12 February 2018 (online)

Abstract:

Realization of the value of reliable codified medical data is growing at a rapid rate. Symptom data in particular have been shown to be useful in decision analysis and in the determination of patient outcomes. Electronic medical record systems are emerging, and attempts are underway to define the structure and content of these systems to support the storage of all medical data. The underlying models upon which these systems are being built continue to be strengthened by a deeper understanding of the complex information they are to store. This report analyzes symptoms as they might be recorded in free text notes and presents a high-level conceptual data model representation of this domain.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Fries JF. The chronic disease data bank model: A conceptual framework for the computer-based medical record. Comput Biomed Res 1992; 25: 586-601.
  • 2 Surveillance and Data Systems. In: US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2000: National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives. DHHS, pub. No. (PHS) 91-50213. US Government Print Office; Washington DC: 1991
  • 3 Institute of Medicine, Committee on Improving the Patient Record. The Computer-Based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 1991: 190.
  • 4 Clinton WJ. American Health Security Act (Working Group Draft). The White House Domestic Policy Council. September 7 1993
  • 5 American National Standards Institute -Healthcare Informatics Standards Planning Panel. Implementation of a Common Data Model for Developers of Healthcare Information Standards: A Working Group Report. New York NY: ANSI-HISPP; May 1993
  • 6 American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard Guide for Description for Content and Structure of an Automated Primary Record of Care. ASTME-1384-91. Philadelphia PA: ASTM; 1991
  • 7 Institute for Electrical and Electronic Engineers. Standard for Medical Device Communications – Overview and Framework. IEEE P1073. Andover MA: IEEE; 1992
  • 8 Johnson S, Friedman C, Cimino JJ, Clark T, Hripcsak G, Clayton PD. Conceptual data model for a central patient database. In: Clayton P. ed. SCAMC. 1991: 381-5.
  • 9 Friedman C, Hripsack G, Johnson SB. et al. A generalized relational schema for an integrated clinical patient database. In: Miller RA. ed. SCAMC. 1990: 335-9.
  • 10 Pauker SG, Gorry GA, Kassirer JP, Schwartz WB. Towards the simulation of clinical cognition: Taking a present illness by computer. Amer J Med 1976; 60: 981-96.
  • 11 Spiegelhalter DJ. Statistical methodology for evaluating gastrointestinal symptoms. Clinics in Gastroenterology 1985; 14: 489-515.
  • 12 Bergeron B. Iliad: A diagnostic consultant and patient simulator. MD Computing 1991; 08: 46-53.
  • 13 Cote RA, Rothwell DJ, Beckett RS, Palotay IL. eds. SNOMED International – The Systematized Nomenclature of Human and Veterinary Medicine. Northfield IL: College of American Pathologists; 1993
  • 14 Board of Directors of the American Medical Informatics Association. Standards for medical identifiers, codes, and messages needed to create an efficient computer-stored medical record. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994; 01: 1-7.
  • 15 Rasmussen NGJ-E, Bassoe C-F. Semantic analysis of medical records. Meth Inform Med 1993; 32: 66-72.
  • 16 Bernauer J. Conceptual graphs as an operational model for descriptive findings. In: Frisse ME. ed. SCAMC. 1992: 214-8.
  • 17 Satomura Y, Do MBAmaral. Automated diagnostic indexing by natural language processing. Med Inform 1992; 17: 149-63.
  • 18 Rothwell DJ, Wingert F, Cote RA. et al. Indexing medical information: The role of SNOMED. In: Kingsland LW. ed. SCAMC. 1989: 534-9.
  • 19 Friedman C, Cimino JJ, Johnson SB. A schema for representing medical language applied to clinical radiology. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 1994; 01: 233-48.
  • 20 Barker R. CASE Method – Entity Relationship Modeling. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley; 1990
  • 21 Campbell KE, Musen MA. Representation of clinical data using SNOMED III and conceptual graphs. In: Frisse ME. ed. SCAMC. 1992: 354-8.
  • 22 Van Ginneken AM, van der Lei J, Moorman PW. Towards unambiguous representation of patient data. In: Frisse ME. ed. SCAMC. 1992: 69-73.
  • 23 Coad P, Yourdon E. Object-Oriented Analysis. 2nd Edition. New York: Prentice Hall; 1991
  • 24 Campbell KE, Das AK, Musen MA. A logical foundation for representation of clinical data. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994; 01: 218-32.
  • 25 Ellis G. Managing large databases of complex medical knowledge using conceptual graphs. In: Hovenga EJS, Whymark GK. eds. Proceedings of the National Health Informatics Conference. Health Informatics Society of Australia, Brisbane Queensland; Australia: August 1993
  • 26 Perez S, Sards A. IRDS Conceptual Schema. Technical report X3H4. New York: American National Standards Institute; 1993
  • 27 Bell DS, Pattison-Gordon E, Greenes RA. Experiments in concept modeling for radiographic image reports. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 1994; 01: 249-62.
  • 28 De Vries W, Eidelman DH. Acyclic directed graphs for automatic image analysis of lung parenchymal geometry. Comput Biomed Res 1993; 26: 344-52.
  • 29 Cimino JJ, Clayton PD, Hripcsak G, Johnson SB. Knowledge-based approaches to the maintenance of a large controlled medical terminology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994; 01: 35-50.
  • 30 Lindberg DAB, Humphreys BL, McCray AT. The Unified Medical Language System. In: Van Bemmel JH, McCray AT. eds. Yearbook of Medical Informatics. Stuttgart: Schattauer Verlag; 1993: 41-51.
  • 31 Sager N, Lyman M, Bucknall C. et al. Natural language processing and the representation of clinical data. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994; 01: 142-60.
  • 32 Campbell KE, Wieckert K, Fagan LM, Musen MA. A computer-based tool for generation of progress notes. In: Safran C. ed. SCAMC. 1993: 284-8.
  • 33 Kukich K. Fluency in natural language reports. In: McDonald DD, Bolc L. eds. Natural Language Generation Systems. New York NY: Springer-Verlag; 1988: 280-311.
  • 34 Hoeke JO, Gelsema ES, Wulkan RW, Leijn-se B. Graphical non-linear representation of multi-dimensional laboratory measurements in their clinical context. Meth Inform Med 1991; 30: 138-14.
  • 35 De Zegher-Geets IM, Freeman AG, Walker MG, Blum RL, Wiederhold G. Summarization and display of one-line medical records. MD Computing 1988; 05: 38-45.
  • 36 Shabot MM, Carlton PD, Sadoff S, Nolan-Avila L. Graphical reports and displays for complex ICU data. In: Ackerman M. ed. SCAMC. 1985: 418-21.
  • 37 Audet A-M, Scott HD. The Uniform Clinical Data Set: An evaluation of the proposed national database for Medicare’s quality review program. Ann Intern Med 1993; 119: 1209-13.