Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1636526
Resumen guía de práctica clínica para la valoración urológica pretrasplante renal
Resumed Clinical Practice Guidelines, Urological Evaluation for Kidney TransplantPublication History
Publication Date:
26 March 2018 (online)
Resumen
En Colombia actualmente, se ha visto un aumento significativo en el número de pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica terminal (ERC-T) llegando a 23.914 en 2014 según las estadísticas del instituto nacional de salud, lo que supone un aumento en el número de trasplantes, aumentando de un 12,5% en 2008 al 18% en 2014 del total de pacientes con ERC-T. Teniendo en cuenta que el trasplante renal se ha consolidado como la mejor opción terapéutica en esos pacientes, es de suma importancia unificar criterios y conceptos basados en la mejor evidencia científica disponible para reducir complicaciones y efectos nocivos derivados de esta terapia, razón por la cual se ha creado esta guía.
Abstract
In Colombia, exist a significant increase in the number of patients with terminal chronic kidney disease (CKD), up to 23,914 patients in 2014 according to statics of the national health institute. This means an increase in the number of transplants, from 12.5% in 2008 to 18% in 2014 from the overall patients with terminal CKD. Considering that kidney transplant is the best option to those patients, it became of extreme importance to unify criteria and concepts based in the best available evidence to reduce complications and negative effects from the therapy. For these reasons we have created this guideline.
-
Bibliografia
- 1 Oosterlee A, Rahmel A, van Zwet W. (eds). Annual report 2005. Leiden: Eurotransplant International Foundation; 2005
- 2 Malaise J, Van Deynse D, Dumont V. , et al. Non-heart-beating donor, 10-year experience in a Belgian transplant center. Transplant Proc 2007; 39 (08) 2578-2579
- 3 Abouna GM. Ethical issues in organ and tissue transplantation. Exp Clin Transplant 2003; 1 (02) 125-138
- 4 Moritsugu KP. Organ donation: the gift of life. J Am Diet Assoc 2007; 107 (01) 15
- 5 Sanni AO, Wilson CH, Wyrley-Birch H. , et al. Non-heart-beating kidney transplantation: 6-year outcomes. Transplant Proc 2006; 38 (10) 3396-3397
- 6 Gok MA, Bhatti AA, Asher J. , et al. The effect of inadequate in situ perfusion in the non heart-beating donor. Transpl Int 2005; 18 (10) 1142-1146
- 7 Signori S, Boggi U, Vistoli F. , et al. Regional procurement team for abdominal organs. Transplant Proc 2004; 36 (03) 435-436
- 8 Simforoosh N, Bassiri A, Ziaee SA. , et al. Laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy: the first randomized clinical trial. Transplant Proc 2003; 35 (07) 2553-2554
- 9 Dalla Valle R, Mazzoni MP, Capocasale E. , et al. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: short learning curve. Transplant Proc 2006; 38 (04) 1001-1002
- 10 Brown SL, Biehl TR, Rawlins MC, Hefty TR. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a comparison of the conven- tional open approach. J Urol 2001; 165 (03) 766-769
- 11 Berardinelli L. Technical problems in living donor transplantation. Transplant Proc 2005; 37 (06) 2449-2450
- 12 Ruszat R, Wyler SF, Wolff T. , et al. Reluctance over right-sided retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy: justified or not?. Transplant Proc 2007; 39 (05) 1381-1385
- 13 Sasaki TM, Finelli F, Bugarin E. , et al. Is laparoscopic donor nephrectomy the new criterion standard?. Arch Surg 2000; 135 (08) 943-947
- 14 Dittrich S, Groneberg DA, von Loeper J. , et al. Influence of cold storage on renal ischemia reperfusion injury after non-heart-beating donor explantation. Nephron Exp Nephrol 2004; 96 (03) e97-e102
- 15 Kootstra G, Daemen JH, Oomen AP. Categories of non-heart beating donors. Transplant Proc 1995; 27 (05) 2893-2894
- 16 Azar SA, Nakhjavani MR, Tarzamni MK, Faragi A, Bahloli A, Badroghli N. Is living kidney donation really safe?. Transplant Proc 2007; 39 (04) 822-823
- 17 Hazebroek EJ, Gommers D, Schreve MA. , et al. Impact of intraoperative donor management on short-term renal function after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg 2002; 236 (01) 127-132
- 18 Lucan M. (ed). [Textbook of surgical urologic techniques.] Bucharest: Infomedica; 2001: 528-536
- 19 Signori S, Boggi U, Vistoli F. , et al. Regional procurement team for abdominal organs. Transplant Proc 2004; 36 (03) 435-436
- 20 Gres P, Avances C, Iborra F, Mourad G, Guiter J. Long-term morbidity of living donor kidney harvesting. Prog Urol 2007; 17 (02) 194-198
- 21 Gürke L, Steiger J, Gasser TC, Sulser T, Bachmann A. Reluctance over right-sided retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy: justified or not?. Transplant Proc 2007; 39 (05) 1381-1385
- 22 Sasaki TM, Finelli F, Bugarin E. , et al. Is laparoscopic donor nephrectomy the new criterion standard?. Arch Surg 2000; 135 (08) 943-947
- 23 Dittrich S, Groneberg DA, von Loeper J. , et al. Influence of cold storage on renal ischemia reperfusion injury after non-heart-beating donor explantation. Nephron Exp Nephrol 2004; 96 (03) e97-e102
- 24 Kootstra G, Daemen JH, Oomen AP. Categories of non-heart beating donors. Transplant Proc 1995; 27 (05) 2893-2894
- 25 Azar SA, Nakhjavani MR, Tarzamni MK, Faragi A, Bahloli A, Badroghli N. Is living kidney donation really safe?. Transplant Proc 2007; 39 (04) 822-823
- 26 Hazebroek EJ, Gommers D, Schreve MA. , et al. Impact of intraoperative donor management on short-term renal function after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg 2002; 236 (01) 127-132
- 27 Lucan M. (ed). [Textbook of surgical urologic techniques.] Bucharest: Infomedica; 2001: 528-536
- 28 Signori S, Boggi U, Vistoli F. , et al. Regional procurement team for abdominal organs. Transplant Proc 2004; 36 (03) 435-436
- 29 Gres P, Avances C, Iborra F, Mourad G, Guiter J. Long-term morbidity of living donor kidney harvesting. Prog Urol 2007; 17 (02) 194-198