Incident Risk Factors and Major Bleeding in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Oral Anticoagulants: A Comparison of Baseline, Follow-up and Delta HAS-BLED Scores with an Approach Focused on Modifiable Bleeding Risk Factors^[*]

Abstract

Aim When assessing bleeding risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), risk stratification is often based on the baseline risks. We aimed to investigate changes in bleeding risk factors and alterations in the HAS-BLED score in AF patients. We hypothesized that a follow-up HAS-BLED score and the ‘delta HAS-BLED score’ (reflecting the change in score between baseline and follow-up) would be more predictive of major bleeding, when compared with baseline HAS-BLED score.

Methods and Results A total of 19,566 AF patients receiving warfarin and baseline HAS-BLED score ≤2 were studied. After a follow-up of 93,783 person-years, 3,032 major bleeds were observed. The accuracies of baseline, follow-up, and delta HAS-BLED scores as well as cumulative numbers of baseline modifiable bleeding risk factors, in predicting subsequent major bleeding, were analysed and compared. The mean baseline HAS-BLED score was 1.43 which increased to 2.45 with a mean ‘delta HAS-BLED score’ of 1.03. The HAS-BLED score remained unchanged in 38.2% of patients. Of those patients experiencing major bleeding, 76.6% had a ‘delta HAS-BLED’ score ≥1, compared with only 59.0% in patients without major bleeding (p < 0.001). For prediction of major bleeding, AUC was significantly higher for the follow-up HAS-BLED (0.63) or delta HAS-BLED (0.62) scores, compared with baseline HAS-BLED score (0.54). The number of baseline modifiable risk factors was non-significantly predictive of major bleeding (AUC = 0.49).

Conclusion In this ‘real-world’ nationwide AF cohort, follow-up HAS-BLED or ‘delta HAS-BLED score’ was more predictive of major bleeding compared with baseline HAS-BLED or the simple determination of ‘modifiable bleeding risk factors’. Bleeding risk in AF is a dynamic process and use of the HAS-BLED score should be to ‘flag up’ patients potentially at risk for more regular review and follow-up, and to address the modifiable bleeding risk factors during follow-up visits.

Keywords

atrial fibrillation - follow-up HAS-BLED score - delta HAS-BLED score - major bleeding

• References

• 1 Lip G, Freedman B, De Caterina R, Potpara TS. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: past, present and future. Comparing the guidelines and practical decision-making. Thromb Haemost 2017; 117 (07) 1230-1239
• 2 Pisters R, Lane DA, Nieuwlaat R, de Vos CB, Crijns HJ, Lip GY. A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: the Euro Heart Survey. Chest 2010; 138 (05) 1093-1100
• 3 Lip GY, Lane DA. Bleeding risk assessment in atrial fibrillation: observations on the use and misuse of bleeding risk scores. J Thromb Haemost 2016; 14 (09) 1711-1714
• 4 National-Institute-for-Health-and-Care-Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: the management of atrial fibrillation. (Clinical guideline 180.) 2014. Available at: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG180 . Accessed February 5, 2018
• 5 Chiang C-E, Okumura K, Zhang S. , et al. 2017 consensus of the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society on stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. J Arrhythm 2017; 33 (04) 345-367
• 6 Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D. , et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J 2016; 37 (38) 2893-2962
• 7 Chao TF, Liu CJ, Wang KL. , et al. Using the CHA2DS2-VASc score for refining stroke risk stratification in ‘low-risk’ Asian patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 64 (16) 1658-1665
• 8 Chao TF, Liu CJ, Wang KL. , et al. Should atrial fibrillation patients with 1 additional risk factor of the CHA2DS2-VASc score (beyond sex) receive oral anticoagulation?. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 65 (07) 635-642
• 9 Chao TF, Wang KL, Liu CJ. , et al. Age threshold for increased stroke risk among patients with atrial fibrillation: a nationwide cohort study from Taiwan. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 66 (12) 1339-1347
• 10 Chao TF, Liu CJ, Tuan TC. , et al. Rate-control treatment and mortality in atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2015; 132 (17) 1604-1612
• 11 Chao TF, Liu CJ, Liao JN. , et al. Use of oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation who have a history of intracranial hemorrhage. Circulation 2016; 133 (16) 1540-1547
• 12 Chao TF, Liu CJ, Tuan TC. , et al. Impact on outcomes of changing treatment guideline recommendations for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a nationwide cohort study. Mayo Clin Proc 2016; 91 (05) 567-574
• 13 Lin LJ, Cheng MH, Lee CH, Wung DC, Cheng CL, Kao Yang YH. Compliance with antithrombotic prescribing guidelines for patients with atrial fibrillation--a nationwide descriptive study in Taiwan. Clin Ther 2008; 30 (09) 1726-1736
• 14 Chang CH, Lee YC, Tsai CT. , et al. Continuation of statin therapy and a decreased risk of atrial fibrillation/flutter in patients with and without chronic kidney disease. Atherosclerosis 2014; 232 (01) 224-230
• 15 Roldán V, Marín F, Muiña B. , et al. Plasma von Willebrand factor levels are an independent risk factor for adverse events including mortality and major bleeding in anticoagulated atrial fibrillation patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57 (25) 2496-2504
• 16 Ban N, Siegfried CJ, Lin JB. , et al. GDF15 is elevated in mice following retinal ganglion cell death and in glaucoma patients. JCI Insight 2017; 2 (09) 2
• 17 Proietti M, Senoo K, Lane DA, Lip GY. Major bleeding in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: impact of time in therapeutic range on contemporary bleeding risk scores. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 24376
• 18 Senoo K, Proietti M, Lane DA, Lip GY. Evaluation of the HAS-BLED, ATRIA, and ORBIT bleeding risk scores in patients with atrial fibrillation taking warfarin. Am J Med 2016; 129 (06) 600-607