Download PDF
Yearb Med Inform 2007; 16(01): 34-46
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1638520
Survey
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart

Section 2: Patient Records: Electronic Patient Records: Moving from Islands and Bridges towards Electronic Health Records for Continuity of Care

Petra Knaup
1   Department of Medical Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Germany
,
Oliver Bott
2   Institute for Medical Informatics, Technical University of Braunschweig, Germany
,
Christian Kohl
1   Department of Medical Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Germany
,
Christian Lovis
3   Service of Medical Informatics, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
,
Sebastian Garde
4   Health Informatics Research Group, Central Queensland University; Austin Health, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
05 March 2018 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objectives

Electronic patient record (EPR) systems are increasingly used and have matured sufficiently so as to contribute to high quality care and efficient patient management. Our objective is to summarize current trends and major achievements in the field of EPR in the last year and to discuss their future prospects.

Results

Integrating health data from a variety of sources in a comprehensive EPR is a major prerequisite for e-health and eresearch. Current research continues to elaborate architectures, technologies and security concepts. To achieve semantic interoperability standards are developed on different levels, including basic data types, messages, services, architectures, terminologies, ontologies, scope and presentation of EPR content. Standards development organisations have started to harmonize their work to arrive at a consensus standard for EPR systems. Integrating the health care enterprise as a whole will optimize efficient use of resources, logistics and scheduling.

Conclusions

The past few years have seen a myriad of developments of EPR systems. However, it is still a long way, until EPR systems can flexibly fulfill all user requirements and an EHR will become broadly accepted. Semantic interoperability will be a key to successful EPR use, especially to avoid double data entries and to better integrate data recording within local workflows. The patient will become an empowered partner, not only by giving him access to his health data. All this will result in enormous quantities of data. Thus, time has come to determine how relevant data can be presented to the stakeholders adequately.

Keywords

Computerized patient record systems - electronic health record - standards - interoperability - medical informatics
 

  • References

  • 1 Oh H, Rizo C, Enkin M, Jadad A. What is eHealth (3): a systematic review of published definitions. J Med Internet Res 2005; 07 (01) e1.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ahern DK, Kreslake JM, Phalen JM. What is eHealth (6): perspectives on the evolution of eHealth research. J Med Internet Res 2006; 08 (01) e4.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Moehr JR, Schaafsma J, Anglin C, Pantazi SV, Grimm NA, Anglin S. Success factors for telehealth A case study. Int J Med Inform 2006; Oct-Nov; 75 (10-11): 755-63.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Hernandez V, Blanquer I. The Grid as a healthcare provision tool. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44 (02) 144-8.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 van Bemmel JH, Musen MA. Handbook of Medical Informatics. Heidelberg: Springer; 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Schabetsberger T, Ammenwerth E, Andreatta S, Gratl G, Haux R, Lechleitner G. et al. From a paperbased transmission of discharge summaries to electronic communication in health care regions. Int J Med Inform 2006; Mar-Apr; 75 (3-4): 209-15.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Knaup P, Pilz J, Kaltschmidt J, Ludt S, Szecsenyi J, Haefeli WE. Standardized documentation of drug recommendations in discharge letters—a contribution to quality management in cooperative care. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (04) 336-42.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Ford EW, Menachemi N, Phillips MT. Predicting the adoption of electronic health records by physicians: when will health care be paperless?. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; Jan-Feb; 13 (01) 106-12.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Ammenwerth E, Iller C, Mahler C. IT-adoption and the interaction of task, technology and individuals: a fit framework and a case study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2006; 06: 3.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Gans D, Kralewski J, Hammons T, Dowd B. Medical groups’ adoption of electronic health records and information systems. Practices are encountering greater-than-expected barriers to adopting an EHR system, but the adoption rate continues to rise. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005; Sep-Oct; 24 (05) 1323-33.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bates DW. Physicians and ambulatory electronic health records. U.S. Physicians are ready to make the transition to EHRs—which is clearly overdue, given the rest of the world’s experience. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005; Sep-Oct; 24 (05) 1180-9.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Nohr C, Andersen SK, Vingtoft S, Bernstein K, Bruun-Rasmussen M. Development, implementation and diffusion of EHR systems in Denmark. Int J Med Inform 2005; Mar; 74 (2-4): 229-34.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Reicher J, Reicher D, Reicher M. Use of Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) Tags in Bedside Monitoring of Endotracheal Tube Position. J Clin Monit Comput. 2007. Apr 4
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Jiang M, Xing B, Sun Z, Fu P, Chen H, Chen M. et al. A Dynamic Blood Information Management System Based on RFID. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2005; 01: 546-9.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Walker J, Pan E, Johnston D, Adler-Milstein J, Bates DW, Middleton B. The Value Of Health Care Information Exchange And Interoperability. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jan 19
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Narayan D. Empowerment. J Ambul Care Manag 2007; Apr-Jun; 30 (02) 120-5.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ma C, Warren J, Phillips P, Stanek J. Empowering patients with essential information and communication support in the context of diabetes. Int J Med Inform 2006; Aug; 75 (08) 577-96.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Tuil WS, Verhaak CM, Braat DD, de Vries Robbe PF, Kremer JA. Empowering patients undergoing in vitro fertilization by providing Internet access to medical data. Fertil Steril. 2007 Apr 6; Epub ahead of print
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Leiner F, Gaus W, Haux R, Knaup-Gregori P. Medical Data Management A Practical Guide. New York: Springer; 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Tang PC, Ash JS, Bates DW, Overhage JM, Sands DZ. Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; Mar-Apr; 13 (02) 121-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Thompson W, Dodek PM, Norena M, Dodek J. Computerized physician order entry of diagnostic tests in an intensive care unit is associated with improved timeliness of service. Crit Care Med 2004; Jun; 32 (06) 1306-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Walker I, Sigouin C, Sek J, Almonte T, Carruthers J, Chan A. et al. Comparing hand-held computers and paper diaries for haemophilia home therapy: a randomized trial. Haemophilia 2004; Nov; 10 (06) 698-704.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Knaup P. Electronic Patient Records and their Benefit for Patient Care. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (Suppl. 01) 40-2.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Jaspers MW, Knaup P, Schmidt D. The computerized patient record: where do we stand?. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (Suppl. 01) 29-39.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Varpio L, Schryer CF, Lehoux P, Lingard L. Working off the record: physicians’ and nurses’ transformations of electronic patient record-based patient information. Acad Med 2006; Oct; 81 (Suppl. 10) S35-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Cheek J, Gillham D, Mills P. Use with care: possibilities and constraints offered by computers in nursing clinical education. Int J Med Inform 1998; 50: 111-5.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Cruz-Correia R, Vieira-Marques P, Ferreira A, Oliveira-Palhares E, Costa P, Costa-Pereira A. Monitoring the integration of hospital information systems: How it may ensure and improve the quality of data. Stud Health Technol Inform 2006; 121: 176-82.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Patel VL, Kaufman DR, Allen VG, Shortliffe EH, Cimino JJ, Greenes RA. Toward a framework for computer-mediated collaborative design in medical informatics. Methods Inf Med 1999; Sep; 38 (03) 158-76.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Gerdsen F, Müller S, Jablonski S, Prokosch HU. Standardized exchange of clinical documents—towards a shared care paradigm in glaucoma treatment. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (04) 359-66.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 van der Haak M, Mludek V, Wolff AC, Bülzebruck H, Oetzel D, Zierhut D. et al. Networking in Shared Care First Steps towards a Shared Electronic Patient Record for Cancer Patients. Methods Inf Med 2002; 41: 419-25.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 de Groen PC, Barry JA, Schaller WJ. Applying World Wide Web Technology to the Study of Patients with Rare Diseases. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129: 107-13.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Rahman M, Morita S, Fukui T, Sakamoto J. Physicians’ choice in using Internet and fax for patient recruitment and follow-up in a randomized controlled trial. Methods Inf Med 2004; 43 (03) 268-72.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Missinou MA, Olola CH, Issifou S, Matsiegui PB, Adegnika AA, Borrmann S. et al. Short report: Piloting paperless data entry for clinical research in Africa. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2005; Mar; 72 (03) 301-3.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 McDonald CJ, Overhage M, Dexter P, Takesue BY, Dwyer D. A Framework for Capturing Clinical Data Sets from Computerized Sources. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127: 675-82.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 El Emam K, Jabbouri S, Sams S, Drouet Y, Power M. Evaluating common de-identification heuristics for personal health information. J Med Internet Res 2006; 08 (04) e28.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Kalra D. Electronic health record standards. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (Suppl. 01) 136-44.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Souhami R. Governance of research that uses identif iable personal data. BMJ 2006; Aug 12; 333 (7563): 315-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Walley T. Using personal health information in medical research. BMJ 2006; Jan 21; 332 (7534): 130-1.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Dorr DA, Phillips WF, Phansalkar S, Sims SA, Hurdle JF. Assessing the difficulty and time cost of de-identification in clinical narratives. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (03) 246-52.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Shabo A. A global socio-economic-medico-legal model for the sustainability of longitudinal electronic health records. Part 1. Methods Inf Med IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2007 2006; 45 (03) 240-5.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Shabo A. A Global Socio-economic-medico-legal Model for the Sustainability of Longitudinal Electronic Health Records Part 2. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (05) 498-505.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Sax U, Schmidt S. Integration of genomic data in Electronic Health Records—opportunities and dilemmas. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44 (04) 546-50.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Kakazu KK, Cheung LW, Lynne W. The Cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid (caBIG): pioneering an expansive network of information and tools for collaborative cancer research. Hawaii Med J 2004; Sep; 63 (09) 273-5.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Hanauer DA, Rhodes DR, Sinha-Kumar C, Chinnaiyan AM. Bioinformatics approaches in the study of cancer. Curr Mol Med 2007; Feb; 07 (01) 133-41.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Saltz J, Oster S, Hastings S, Langella S, Kurc T, Sanchez W. et al. caGrid: design and implementation of the core architecture of the cancer biomedical informatics grid. Bioinformatics 2006; Aug 1; 22 (15) 1910-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Phillips J, Chilukuri R, Fragoso G, Warzel D, Covitz PA. The caCORE Software Development Kit: streamlining construction of interoperable biomedical information services. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2006; 06: 2.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Tobias J, Chilukuri R, Komatsoulis GA, Mohanty S, Sioutos N, Warzel DB. et al. The CAP cancer protocols—a case study of caCORE based data standards implementation to integrate with the Cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2006; 06: 25.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Pare G, Jaana M, Sicotte C. Systematic review of home telemonitoring for chronic diseases: the evidence base. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007; May-Jun; 14 (03) 269-77.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Meystre S. The current state of telemonitoring: a comment on the literature. Telemed J E Health 2005; Feb; 11 (01) 63-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Revere D, Turner AM, Madhavan A, Rambo N, Bugni PF, Kimball A. et al. Understanding the information needs of public health practitioners: A literature review to inform design of an interactive digital knowledge management system. J Biomed Inform. 2007 Jan 11
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Noone J, Warren J, Brittain M. Information overload: opportunities and challenges for the GP’s desktop. Medinfo 1998; 09 Pt 2: 1287-91.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Quaglini S. Information models for data sharing. Neurol Sci 2006; Jun; 27 (Suppl. 03) S281-3.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Blobel BG, Engel K, Pharow P. Semantic interoperability—HL7 Version 3 compared to advanced architecture standards. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (04) 343-53.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Rothschild AS, Lehmann HP. Information retrieval performance of probabilistically generated, problem-specific computerized provider order entry picklists: a pilot study. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005; May-Jun; 12 (03) 322-30.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Sundvall E, Nyström M, Forss M, Chen R, Petersson H, Åhlfeldt H. Graphical Overview and Navigation of Electronic Health Records in a prototyping environment using Google Earth and openEHR Archetypes. Accepted to Medinfo 2007. 2007
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Ruotsalainen P. Security requirements in EHR systems and archives. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004; 103: 453-8.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Pharow P, Blobel B. Security infrastructure services for electronic archives and electronic health records. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004; 103: 434-40.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Georgiadis CK, Mavridis IK, Pangalos GI. Healthcare teams over the Internet: programming a certificate-based approach. Int J Med Inform 2003; Jul; 70 (2-3): 161-71.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Pharow P, Blobel B. Security infrastructure requirements for electronic health cards communication. Stud Health Technol Inform 2005; 116: 403-8.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Ash JS, Berg M, Coiera E. Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; Mar-Apr; 11 (02) 104-12.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Norgall T. Interoperability—a key infrastructure requirement for personalised health services. Stud Health Technol Inform 2005; 117: 125-33.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Hinchley A. Understanding. A primer on the HL7 Version 3 Communication Standard. Köln: Alexander Mönch Verlag. 2005
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Dolin RH, Alschuler L, Beebe C, Biron PV, Boyer SL, Essin D. et al. The HL7 Clinical Document Architecture. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2001; Nov-Dec; 08 (06) 552-69.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Kalra D, Beale T, Heard S. The openEHR Foundation. Stud Health Technol Inform 2005; 115: 153-73.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Schweiger R, Brumhard M, Hoelzer S, Dudeck J. Implementing health care systems using XML standards. Int J Med Inform 2005; Mar; 74 (2-4): 267-77.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Spyrou SS, Berler AA, Bamidis PD. Information system interoperability in a regional health care system infrastructure: a pilot study using health care information standards. Stud Health Technol Inform 2003; 95: 364-9.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Bludau HB, Wolff A, Hochlehnert AJ. Presenting XML-based medical discharge letters according to CDA. Methods Inf Med 2003; 42 (05) 552-6.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Goossen WT, Jonker MJ, Heitmann KU, Jongeneelde ICHaas, de Jong T, van der Slikke JW. et al. Electronic patient records: domain message information model perinatology. Int J Med Inform 2003; Jul; 70 (2-3): 265-76.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Muller ML, Uckert F, Burkle T, Prokosch HU. Cross-institutional data exchange using the clinical document architecture (CDA). Int J Med Inform 2005; Mar; 74 (2-4): 245-56.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 van der Linden H, Tange H, Talmon J, Hasman A. PropeR revisited. Stud Health Technol Inform 2003; 95: 346-51.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 van der Linden H, Boers G, Tange H, Talmon J, Hasman A. PropeR: a multi disciplinary EPR system. Int J Med Inform 2003; Jul; 70 (2-3): 149-60.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Simons WW, Mandl KD, Kohane IS. The PING personally controlled electronic medical record system: technical architecture. JAm Med Inform Assoc 2005; Jan-Feb; 12 (01) 47-54.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 W3C. Extensible Markup Language (XML). [cited 20.04.2007]; Available from: http://www.w3.org/ XML/.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Hanzlicek P, Spidlen J, Heroutova H, Nagy M. User interface of MUDR electronic health record. Int J Med Inform 2005; Mar; 74 (2-4): 221-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Blobel B. Comparing approaches for advanced ehealth security infrastructures. Int J Med Inform 2007; May-Jun; 76 (5-6): 454-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Bergmann J, Bott OJ, Pretschner DP, Haux R. An econsent-based shared EHR system architecture for integrated healthcare networks. Int J Med Inform 2007; Feb-Mar; 76 (2-3): 130-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Sucurovic S. Implementing security in a distributed web-based EHCR. Int J Med Inform 2007; May-Jun; 76 (5-6): 491-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Boniface M, Watkins ER, Saleh A, Dogac A, Eichelberg M. A secure semantic interoperability infrastructure for inter-enterprise sharing of electronic healthcare records. Stud Health Technol Inform 2006; 120: 225-35.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Lenz R, Beyer M, Kuhn KA. Semantic integration in healthcare networks. Int J Med Inform 2007; FebMar; 76 (2-3): 201-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Blobel B. Advanced and secure architectural EHR approaches. Int J Med Inform 2006; Mar-Apr; 75 (34) 185-90.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Bernstein K, Bruun-Rasmussen M, Vingtoft S. A method for specification of structured clinical content in electronic health records. Stud Health Technol Inform 2006; 124: 515-21.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Giokas D. Canada Health Infoway Towards a National Interoperable Electronic Health Record (EHR) Solution. Stud Health Technol Inform 2005; 115: 108-40.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 83 Wozak F, Ammenwerth E, Breu M, Penz R, Schabetsberger T, Vogl R. et al. Medical Data GRIDs as approach towards secure cross enterprise document sharing (based on IHE XDS). Stud Health Technol Inform 2006; 124: 377-83.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 84 Kuhn KA, Wurst SH, Bott OJ, Giuse DA. Expanding the scope of health information systems. Challenges and developments. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (Suppl. 01) 43-52.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 85 Koch S. Home telehealth—current state and future trends. Int J Med Inform 2006; Aug; 75 (08) 565-76.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 86 Bott OJ, Ammenwerth E, Brigl B, Knaup P, Lang E, Pilgram R. et al. The challenge of ubiquitous computing in health care: technology, concepts and solutions. Findings from the IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2005. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44 (03) 473-9.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 87 Haux R. Individualization, globalization and health about sustainable information technologies and the aim of medical informatics. Int J Med Inform 2006; Dec; 75 (12) 795-808.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 88 Chronaki CE, Chiarugi F. Interoperability as a quality labelforportable&wearablehealthmonitoringsystems. Stud Health Technol Inform 2005; 117: 108-16.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 89 Walseth OA, Arsand E, Sund T, Skipenes E. Wireless transferofsensordataintoelectronichealthrecords. Stud Health Technol Inform 2005; 116: 334-9.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 90 NHS Connecting for Health. Investigating implementing CEN 13606 with HL7 V3 and SNOMED CT Final Report. 2006 http://detailedclinicalmodels. org/documents/NHS_CFH_13606InvestigationRpt_ v1-0.pdf last accessed June 2007, 12th
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 91 Martin-Sanchez F, Iakovidis I, Norager S, Maojo V, De Groen P, Van Der Lei J. et al. Synergy between medical informatics and bioinformatics: facilitating genomic medicine for future health care. J Biomed Inform 2004; Feb; 37 (01) 30-42.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 92 Schadow G, Mead CN, Walker DM. The HL7 reference information model under scrutiny. Stud Health Technol Inform 2006; 124: 151-6.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 93 Smith B, Ceusters W. HL7 RIM: an incoherent standard. Stud Health Technol Inform 2006; 124: 133-8.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 94 Dolin RH, Alschuler L, Boyer S, Beebe C. et al. Behlen IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2007 FM Biron PVHL7 Clinical Document Architecture, Release 2. J Am Med InformAssoc 2006; Jan-Feb; 13 (01) 30-9.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 95 Schulz S, Hanser S, Hahn U, Rogers J. The semantics of procedures and diseases in SNOMED CT. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (04) 354-8.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 96 Richesson RL, Andrews J, Krischer J. Use of SNOMED CT to Represent Clinical Research Data: A Semantic Characterization of Data Items on Case Report Forms in Vasculitis Research. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006. Jun 23
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 97 Cornet R, de Keizer NF, Abu-Hanna A. A framework for characterizing terminological systems. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (03) 253-66.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 98 Hovenga EJS, Garde S, Carr T, Hullin CM. Innovative approaches and processes for capturing expert aged care knowledge for multiple purposes. electronic Journal of Health Informatics 2007; 02 (01) e5.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 99 Standards Australia. Report on international standards meetings and HIMSS Europe, October-November 2006. Part 1 of 3 – Global Health Information Technology Standards Summit. 2006
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 100 Ferranti JM, Musser RC, Kawamoto K, Hammond WE. The clinical document architecture and the continuity of care record: a critical analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; MayJun; 13 (03) 245-52.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 101 Haux R, Winter A, Ammenwerth E, Brigl B. Strategic Information Management in Hospitals. An Introduction to Hospital Information Systems. New York: Springer; 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 102 Brigl B, Hubner-Bloder G, Wendt T, Haux R, Winter A. Architectural quality criteria for hospital information systems. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2005; 81-5.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 103 Ammenwerth E, Buchauer A, Haux R. A Requirements Index for Information Processing in Hospitals. Methods Inf Med 2002; 41: 282-8.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 104 Hübner-Bloder G, Ammenwerth E, Brigl B, Winter A. Specification of a reference model for the domain layer of a hospital information system. Stud Health Technol Inform 2005; 116: 497-502.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 105 Winter A, Brigl B, Wendt T. Modeling hospital information systems. Part 1: The revised threelayer graph-based meta model 3LGM2. Methods Inf Med 2003; 42 (05) 544-51.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 106 Frisse M. IAIMS: planning for change. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1997; Mar-Apr; 04 (Suppl. 02) S13-9.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 107 Boyes A, Newell S, Girgis A. Rapid assessment of psychosocial well-being: are computers the way forward in a clinical setting?. Qual Life Res 2002; 11 (01) 27-35.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 108 Kaushal R, Shojania KG, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 2003; Jun 23; 163 (12) 1409-16.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 109 Krohn R. In search of the ROI from CPOE. J Healthc Inf Manag 2003; Fall; 17 (04) 6-9.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 110 Garde S, Baumgarten B, Basu O, Graf N, Haux R, Herold R. et al. A Meta-Model of Chemotherapy Planning in the Multi-Hospital / MultiTrial-Center-Environment of Pediatric Oncology. Methods Inf Med 2004; 43: 171-83.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 111 Menachemi N, Brooks RG. Reviewing the benefits and costs of electronic health records and associated patient safety technologies. J Med Syst 2006; Jun; 30 (03) 159-68.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 112 Haux R. Health information systems past, present, future. Int J Med Inform 2006; Mar-Apr; 75 (3-4): 268-81.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 113 Müller H, Michoux N, Bandon D, Geissbuhler A. A review of content-based image retrieval systems in medical applications-clinical benefits and future directions. Int J Med Inf 2004; Feb; 73 (01) 1-23.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 114 Maudlin J, Keene J, Kobb R. A road map for the last journey: home telehealth for holistic end-oflife care. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2006; Oct-Nov; 23 (05) 399-403.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 115 Poh CL, Kitney RI, Shrestha RB. Addressing the future of clinical information systems—Webbased multilayer visualization. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2007; Mar; 11 (02) 127-40.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 116 Schlag PM. On the Way to New Horizons: Telemedicine in Oncology. Oncologist 1997; 02 (02) III-IV.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 117 Turisco F, Keogh D, Stubbs C, Glaser J, Crowley Jr WF. Current status of integrating information technologies into the clinical research enterprise within US academic health centers: strategic value and opportunities for investment. J Investig Med 2005; Dec; 53 (08) 425-33.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 118 Kramer S. The doctor will see you now. Looking to cut costs and improve care, providers are turning to telehealth. Healthc Inform 2007; Feb; 24 (02) 48-50.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 119 Spahni S, Lovis C, Ackermann M, Mach N, Bonnabry P, Geissbuhler A. Guarantying the quality of chemotherapy: from the order to the administration. Stud Health Technol Inform 2006; 124: 241-6.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 120 Shea S, Weinstock RS, Starren J, Teresi J, Palmas W, Field L. et al. A randomized trial comparing telemedicine case management with usual care in older, ethnically diverse, medically underserved patients with diabetes mellitus. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; Jan-Feb; 13 (01) 40-51.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 121 Halamka J, Juels A, Stubblefield A, Westhues J. The security implications of VeriChip cloning. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; Nov-Dec; 13 (06) 601-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 122 Lester J, Prady S, Finegan Y, Hoch D. Learning from e-patients at Massachusetts General Hospital. BMJ 2004; May 15; 328 (7449): 1188-90.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 123 Vishwanatham R. Citation analysis in journal rankings: medical informatics in the library and information science literature. Bulletin of the Medical LibraryAssociation 1998; 86 (04) 518-22.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 124 Sutherland LA, Campbell M, Ornstein K, Wildemuth B, Lobach D. Development of an adaptive multimedia program to collect patient health data. Am J Prev Med 2001; 21 (04) 320-4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 125 Simons W, Halamka J, Kohane IS, Nigrin D, Finstein N, Mandl KD. Integration of the Personally Controlled Electronic Medical Record into Regional Inter-regional Data Exchanges: A National Demonstration. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006; 1099.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 126 Heeks R. Health information systems: Failure, success and improvisation. Int J Med Inform 2006; Feb; 75 (02) 125-37.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 127 Shapiro JS, Kannry J, Lipton M, Goldberg E, Conocenti P, Stuard S. et al. Approaches to patient health information exchange and their impact on emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med 2006; Oct; 48 (04) 426-32.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 128 Barthell EN, Pemble KR. The National Emergency Medical Extranet project. J Emerg Med 2003; Jan; 24 (01) 95-100.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 129 Lagoe RJ, Westert GP. Community wide electronic distribution of summary health care utilization data. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2006; 06: 17.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 130 Rosenbloom ST, Miller RA, Johnson KB, Elkin PL, Brown SH. Interface terminologies: facilitating direct entry of clinical data into electronic health record systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; May-Jun; 13 (03) 277-88.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 131 Hazlehurst B, Frost HR, Sittig DF, Stevens VJ. MediClass: A system for detecting and classifying encounter-based clinical events in any electronic medical record. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005; standardized documentation structured data entry; 12 (05) 517-29.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 132 Li Q, Wu YF. Identifying important concepts from medical documents. J Biomed Inform 2006; Dec; 39 (06) 668-79.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 133 Melton GB, Hripcsak G. Automated detection of adverse events using natural language processing of discharge summaries. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005; Jul-Aug; 12 (04) 448-57.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 134 Meystre S, Haug PJ. Natural language processing to extract medical problems from electronic clinical documents: performance evaluation. J Biomed Inform 2006; Dec; 39 (06) 589-99.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 135 Zeng QT, Goryachev S, Weiss S, Sordo M, Murphy SN, Lazarus R. Extracting principal diagnosis, co-morbidity and smoking status for asthma research: evaluation of a natural language processing system. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2006; 06: 30.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 136 Kuperman GJ, Gibson RF. Computer physician order entry: benefits, costs, and issues. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139 (01) 31-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 137 Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A, Abaluck B, Localio AR, Kimmel SE. et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA 2005; Mar 9; 293 (10) 1197-203.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 138 Ali NA, Mekhjian HS, Kuehn PL, Bentley TD, Kumar R, Ferketich AK. et al. Specificity of computerized physician order entry has a significant effect on the efficiency of workflow for critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2005; Jan; 33 (01) 110-4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar