RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1638845
Formal Ontologies in Biomedical Knowledge Representation
Publikationsverlauf
Publikationsdatum:
05. März 2018 (online)
Summary
Objectives: Medical decision support and other intelligent applications in the life sciences depend on increasing amounts of digital information. Knowledge bases as well as formal ontologies are being used to organize biomedical knowledge and data. However, these two kinds of artefacts are not always clearly distinguished. Whereas the popular RDF(S) standard provides an intuitive triple-based representation, it is semantically weak. Description logics based ontology languages like OWL-DL carry a clear-cut semantics, but they are computationally expensive, and they are often misinterpreted to encode all kinds of statements, including those which are not ontological.
Method: We distinguish four kinds of statements needed to comprehensively represent domain knowledge: universal statements, terminological statements, statements about particulars and contingent statements. We argue that the task of formal ontologies is solely to represent universal statements, while the non-ontological kinds of statements can nevertheless be connected with ontological representations. To illustrate these four types of representations, we use a running example from parasitology.
Results: We finally formulate recommendations for semantically adequate ontologies that can efficiently be used as a stable framework for more context-dependent biomedical knowledge representation and reasoning applications like clinical decision support systems.
-
References
- 1 (Web resources: last accessed Mar 28, 2013) Anderson C. The end of theory: the data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete. 2008 http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/magazine/16-07/pb_theory
- 2 Müller H, Hanbury A, Al Shorbaji N. Health information search to deal with the exploding amount of health information produced. Methods Inf Med 2012; Dec 4 51 (6) 516-8.
- 3 Keim B. Paging Dr. Watson: Artificial intelligence as a prescription for health care. 2012 http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/10/watson-for-medicine/all/
- 4 United States National Library of Medicine (NLM). Unified Medical Language System (UMLS). 2013 http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls
- 5 World Health Organization (WHO). International Classification of Diseases (ICD). 2013 http://www.who.int/classifications/icd
- 6 World health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/
- 7 UMC (Uppsala Centre for International Drug Monitoring). WHO Drug Dictionary Enhanced. 2013 http://www.umc-products.com
- 8 WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (WHOCC). Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System (ATC). 2013 http://www.whocc.no/atcddd
- 9 United States National Library of Medicine (NLM). RxNorm. 2013 http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/rxnorm
- 10 World Health Organization. Dictionary of Medicines and Devices (dm+d). 2013 http://www.dmd.nhs.uk
- 11 Regenstrief Institute. Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC). 2013 http://loinc.org
- 12 United States National Library of Medicine (NLM). Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). 2013 http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh
- 13 Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT). 2008 http://www.ihtsdo.org/snomed-ct
- 14 Greenes RA, McClure RC, Pattison-Gordon E, Sato L. The findings-diagnosis continuum: implications for image descriptions and clinical databases. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1992; 383-7.
- 15 Rodrigues JM, Trombert-Paviot B, Baud R, Wagner J, Rusch P, Meusnier F. Galen-In-Use: an EU Project applied to the development of a new national coding system for surgical procedures: NCAM. Stud Health Technol Inform 1997; 43 Pt B 897-901.
- 16 Schulz S, Romacker M, Hahn U. Part-whole reasoning in medical ontologies revisited -introducing EP triplets into classification-based description logics. Proc AMIA Symp 1998; 830-4.
- 17 Hahn U, Romacker M, Schulz S. MedSynD-iKATe--design considerations for an ontology-based medical text understanding system. Proc AMIA Symp 2000; 330-4.
- 18 Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM. et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 2000; May 25 (1) 25-9.
- 19 Cimino JJ, Zhu X. The practical impact of ontologies on biomedical informatics. Yearb Med Inform 2006; 124-35.
- 20 Bodenreider O. Biomedical ontologies in action: role in knowledge management, data integration and decision support. Yearb Med Inform 2008; 67-79.
- 21 Guarino N, Giaretta P. Ontologies and Knowledge Bases — Towards a Terminological Clarification. In: Towards Very Large Knowledge Bases. 1995: 25-32 IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.:
- 22 Kusnierczyk W. Nontological Engineering. Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference (FOIS 2006). Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2006. p. 39-50.
- 23 Musen M. Ontologies — Necessary-Indeed Essential-but Not Sufficient. In: Brewster C, O'Hara K. Knowledge Representation with Ontologies: The Present and Future. IEEE Intelligent Systems. 2004 19. (1) 77-9.
- 24 Hofweber T. Logic and Ontology. In: Zalta EN. editor. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Spring; 2013. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2013/entries/logic-ontology/
- 25 Guarino N. Formal Ontology, Conceptual Analysis and Knowledge Representation. IntJHum Comput Stud 1995; 43 (5-6) 625-40.
- 26 Smith B. Beyond Concepts: Ontology as Reality Representation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems. 2004 11. 39-50.
- 27 Quine WV. On what there is. In: Gibson R. Quintessence-Basic Readings from the Philosophy of W. V. Quine. Cambridge: Belknap Press, Harvard University; 2004
- 28 Kremer K, Wolf U. Ontologie. In: Ritter J, Gründer K. editors Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, vol. 6. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft; 1984. p. 1189-200.
- 29 Uschold M, Gruninger M. Ontologies: Principles, Methods and Applications. Knowl Eng Rev 1996; 11 (2) 39-136.
- 30 Castillo-Barrera FE, Medina Ramirez C, Duran-Limon HA. Knowledge Capitalization in a Component-Based Software Factory: a Semantic Viewpoint. LA-NMR. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2001; 804: 105-14.
- 31 Fiannaca A, La Rosa M, Rizzo R, Urso A, Gaglio S. An ontology design methodology for Knowledge-Based systems with application to bioinformatics. Computational Intelligence in Bio-informatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB), 2012. IEEE Symposium. 9-12 May 2012 p. 85-91.
- 32 Semy SK, Hetherington-Young KN, Frey SE. Ontology Engineering: An Application Perspective. Technical Paper. The MITRE Corporation. 2004 http://www.mitre.org/work/tech_papers/tech_papers_04/04_0847/index.html
- 33 Stevens R, Goble CA, Bechhofer S. Ontology-based knowledge representation for bioinformatics. Brief Bioinform 2000; Nov 1 (4) 398-414.
- 34 White S. What the Heck is an Ontology?. http://www.catalysoft.com/articles/WhatIsAnOntology.html
- 35 Gruber TR. A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications. Knowledge Acquisition (Special issue: Current issues in knowledge modeling) 1993; 5 (2) 199-200.
- 36 Schulz S, Johansson I. Continua in Biological Systems. The Monist 2007; 90 (4) 499-522.
- 37 Sowa J. Ontology. http://www.jfsowa.com/ontology/
- 38 OWL2 profiles. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-profiles
- 39 Klein GO, Smith B. Concept Systems and Ontologies: Recommendations for Basic Terminology. Trans Jpn Soc Artif Intell 2010; Jan 1 25 (3) 433-41.
- 40 Smith B, Ashburner M, Rosse C, Bard J, Bug W, Ceusters W. et al. The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nat Biotechnol 2007; Nov 25 (11) 1251-5.
- 41 Baader F, Calvanese D, McGuinness DL, Nardi D, Patel-Schneider PF. The Description Logic Handbook. Theory, Implementation, and Applications (2nd Edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007
- 42 Musen MA, Noy NF, Shah NH, Whetzel PL, Chute CG, Story MA. et al NCBO team. The National Center for Biomedical Ontology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012; Mar-Apr 19 (2) 190-5.
- 43 Whetzel PL, Noy NF, Shah NH, Alexander PR, Nyulas C, Tudorache T. et al. BioPortal: enhanced functionality via new Web services from the National Center for Biomedical Ontology to access and use ontologies in software applications. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jul;39.
- 44 The OBO Foundry. http://www.obofoundry.org
- 45 Ontology Design Datterns. http://ontologydesign-patterns.org
- 46 Ontology Design Patterns Public Catalog. http://www.gong.manchester.ac.uk/odp/html/
- 47 BMIR (Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research). The Protégé Ontology Editor and Knowledge Acquisition System. 2013 http://protege.stanford.edu
- 48 The OWL API. http://owlapi.sourceforge.net/
- 49 OntoFox. http://ontofox.hegroup.org/
- 50 Poveda-Villalon M, Suârez-Figueroa M, Gomez-Pérez A. Validating Ontologies with OOPS!. EKAW 2012; 267-81.
- 51 Schober D, Tudose I, Svatek V, Boeker M. Onto-Check: verifying ontology naming conventions and metadata completeness in Protégé 4. J Biomed Semantics 2012; Sep 21 3 Suppl 2 S4.
- 52 Horrocks I, Patel-Schneider PF, van Harmelen F. From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: The Making of a Web Ontology Language. Journal of Web Semantics 2003; 1 (1) 7-26.
- 53 Golbreich C, Horrocks I. The OBO to OWL mapping, GO to OWL 1.1! OWLED 2007. OWL: Experiences and Directions. Third International Workshop, Innsbruck; Austria 6-7 June 2007
- 54 Grenon P, Smith B. SNAP and SPAN: Towards Dynamic Spatial Ontology. Spat Cogn Comput 2004; 4 (1) 69-103.
- 55 Borgo S, Masolo C. Ontological Foundations of DOLCE. In: Staab S, Studer R. editors. Handbook on Ontologies (Second Edition). Springer Verlag; 2009. p. 361-82.
- 56 Sowa JF. Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical, and Computational Foundations. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks Cole Publishing Co; 2000
- 57 Guarino N. An Overview of OntoClean. Handbook on Ontologies, second edition. Springer; 2009. p. 201-22.
- 58 ONTOLOG-collaborative work environment. http://ontolog.cim3.net/
- 59 Cornet R, de Keizer N. Forty years of SNOMED: a literature review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2008; 8 Suppl.1 S2.
- 60 Schulz S, Rector A, Rodrigues JM, Chute C, Üstün B, Spackman K. Ontology-based convergence of medical terminologies: SNOMED CT and ICD 11. eHealth 2012-Health Informatics meets eHealth. May 10-11 2012. Vienna, Austria.:
- 61 McCray AT. An upper-level ontology for the biomedical domain. Comp Funct Genomics 2003; 4 (1) 80-4.
- 62 Smith B, Ceusters W, Klagges B, Köhler J, Kumar A, Lomax J. et al. Relations in biomedical ontologies. Genome Biology 2005; 6 (5) R46.
- 63 Beisswanger E, Schulz S, Stenzhorn H, Hahn U. BioTop: An upper domain ontology for the life sciences. A description of its current structure, contents and interfaces to OBO ontologies. Appl Ontol 2008; 3 (4) 205-12.
- 64 Schulz S, Beisswanger E, van den Hoek L, Bodenreider O, van Mulligen EM. Alignment of the UMLS semantic network with BioTop: methodology and assessment. Bioinformatics 2009; Jun 15 2 (12) i69-76.
- 65 Smith B, Almeida M, Bona J, Brochhausen M, Ceusters W, Courtot M. et al. Basic Formal Ontology 2.0. Draft specification and user's guide. http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/bfo/2012-07-20/Reference
- 66 Hoehndorf R, Loebe F, Poli R, Herre H. Kelso GFO-Bio: A biological core ontology. Appl Ontol 2008; 3 (4) 219-27.
- 67 Dumontier M. The Semanticscience Integrated Ontology (SIO). 2012 http://semanticscience.org
- 68 Brachman RJ, Gilbert VP, Levesque HJ. An Essential Hybrid Reasoning System: Knowledge and Symbol Level Accounts of KRYPTON. IJCAI 1985; 532-9.
- 69 Filariasis. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filariasis
- 70 Elephantiasis. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elephantiasis
- 71 Podoconiasis. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Podoconiosis
- 72 Meeting of the International Task Force for Disease Eradication, April 2011. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 2011; Aug 5 86 (32) 341-51.
- 73 Shortliffe EH, Davis R, Axline SG, Buchanan BG, Green CC, Cohen SN. Computer-based consultations in clinical therapeutics: explanation and rule acquisition capabilities of the MYCIN system. Comput Biomed Res 1975; 8 (8) 303-20.
- 74 Klyne G, Carroll GG. Resource Description Framework (RDF): Concepts and Abstract Syntax. W3C Recommendation 10 February. 2004 http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/
- 75 Schulz S, Stenzhorn H, Boeker M, Smith B. Strengths and limitations of formal ontologies in the biomedical domain. RECIIS: Revista Eletrônica de Comunicaçao, Informaçao & Inovaçao em Saude. 2009 Mar'l 3. (1) 31-45.
- 76 Boyd R. Scientific Realism, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2002 http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-realism
- 77 Merrill G. Ontological Realism: Methodology or Misdirection. Appl Ontol 2010; 5 (2) 79-108.
- 78 Merrill G. Realism and Reference Ontologies: Considerations, Reflections, and Problems. Appl Ontol 2010; 5: 189-221.
- 79 Smith B, Ceusters W. Ontological realism: A methodology for coordinated evolution of scientific ontologies. Appl Ontol 2010; Nov 15 5 (3-4) 139-88.
- 80 Maojo V, Crespo J, Garcia-Remesal M, de la Iglesia D, Perez-Rey D, Kulikowski C. Biomedical ontologies: toward scientific debate. Methods Inf Med 2011; 50 (3) 203-16.
- 81 Brochhausen M, Burgun A, Ceusters W, Hasman A, Leong TY, Musen M. et al. Discussion of “Biomedical ontologies: toward scientific debate”. Methods Inf Med 2011; 50 (3) 217-36.
- 82 Rector AL, Bechhofer S, Goble CG, Horrocks I, Nowlan WA, Solomon WD. The GRAIL concept modelling language for medical terminology. Artif Intell Med 1997; 9 (2) 139-71.
- 83 Hermit OWL. reasoner. http://www.hermit-reasoner.com/
- 84 Sirin E, Parsia B, Cuenca Grau B, Kalyanpur A, Katz Y. Pellet: A Practical OWL DL Reasoner. Journal of Web Semantics 2007; 5 (2) 51-3.
- 85 Tsarkov D, Horrocks I. FaCT++ Description Logic Reasoner: System Description. Proceedings ofthe Third International Joint Conference on Automated Reasoning, 8. 2006. Heidelberg: Springer; 2006. p. 292-7.
- 86 Horridge M, Drummond N, Goodwin J, Rector A, Stevens R, Wang H. The Manchester OWL Syntax. Proc. of the OWLED Workshop: Experiences and Directions, 2006, 11. 2006 http://ftp.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-216
- 87 W3C OWL working group. OWL 2 Web Ontology Language, Document Overview. W3C Recommendation. 11 December 2012 http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/
- 88 Krieger HU. Where temporal description logics fail: representing temporally-changing relationships. KI 2008: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 5243. Springer. 2008 p. 249-57
- 89 Zamborlini V, Guizzardi G. On the Representation of Temporally Changing Information in OWL. EDOCW; 2010: 283-92.
- 90 Noy N, Rector A. Defining N-ary Relations on the Semantic Web. W3C Working Group Note. 12 April 2006 http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-n-aryRelations/
- 91 Grewe N. A generic reification strategy for n-ary relations in DL. 2nd Workshop of Ontologies in Biomedicine and Life Sciences (OBML). Mannheim. 9.-10.9 2010 http://www.bioontology.org/node/628
- 92 Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). http://code.google.com/p/bfo/
- 93 Schulz S. BioTop-A Top-Domain Ontology for the Life Sciences. 2012 http://purl.org/biotop
- 94 Röhl J, Jansen L. Representing Dispositions. J Biomed Semantics 2011; 2 Suppl 4 S4. http://www.biomedsem.com/content/2/S4/S4
- 95 Baader F, Penaloza R, Suntisrivarporn B. Pinpointing in the Description Logic EL. Proceedings of the DL 2007 International Workshop on Description Logics (DL2007). Edited by Diego Calvanese. et al. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-250/
- 96 Baader F, Litz C, Suntisrivarporn B. CEL — A Polynomial-time Reasoner for Life Science Ontologies. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Automated Reasoning, 8, 2006. Heidelberg: Springer; 2006. p. 287-91.
- 97 Rector A. Barriers, approaches and research priorities for integrating biomedical ontologies. 2008 http://www.semantichealth.org/DELIVER-ABLES/SemanticHEALTH_D6_1.pdf
- 98 Fellbaum C. editor. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1998
- 99 Kless D, Milton SK, Kazmierczak E. Relationships and relata in ontologies and thesauri: Differences and similarities. Appl Ontol 2012; 7 (4) 401-28.
- 100 Soualmia LF, Golbreich C, Darmoni S. Representing the MeSH in OWL: Towards a Semi-Automatic Migration. Workshop on Formal Biomedical Knowledge Representation (KR-MED) 7 2004; 81-7.
- 101 Schulz S, Schober D, Tudose I, Stenzhorn H. The Pitfalls of Thesaurus Ontologization-the Case of the NCI Thesaurus. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2010; Nov 13 2010: 727-31.
- 102 Schulz S, Hahn U. Medical knowledge reengineering-converting major portions of the UMLS into a terminological knowledge base. Int J Med Inform 2001; 64 (2-3) 207-21.
- 103 Kless D, Jansen L, Lindenthal J, Wiebensohn J. A method for re-engineering a thesaurus into an ontology. In: Donnelly M, Guizzardi G. editors. Formal Ontology and Information Systems (FOIS 2012). Amsterdam: IOS; 2012. p. 133-46.
- 104 Neuhaus F, Smith B. Modelling Principles and Methodologies. Relations in anatomical ontologies. In: Burger A, Davidson D, Baldock R. editors. Anatomy Ontologies for Bioinformatics: Principles and Practice. 2007
- 105 Schulz S, Hahn U. Towards the ontological foundations of symbolic biological theories. Artif Intell Med 2007; Mar 39 (3) 237-50.
- 106 UNIPROT (Universal Protein Resource Consortium). UniProt Protein Knowledgebase. 2013 http://www.uniprot.org
- 107 Noy NF, McGuinness DL. Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology. 2001 Technical Report http://ce.sharif.edu/~daneshpajouh/ontology/ontology-tutorial-noy-mcguinness.pdf
- 108 Schulz S, Karlsson D. Records and situations. Integrating contextual aspects in clinical ontologies. In: Shah N, Sansone SA, Stephens R, Soldatova L. editors. The 14th Annual Bio-Ontologies Meeting. Vienna, Austria: ISCB; 2011. p. 49-52.
- 109 Semantic Health Net Network of Excellence. http://www.semantichealthnet.eu/
- 110 Martinez-Costa C, Schulz S. Ontology-based reengineering of the SNOMED CT context hierarchy. Manuscript under review at AIME. 2013
- 111 Stevens R. Higher Order Knowledge in Ontologies. Ontogenesis Blod. May 2011 http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/1080
- 112 Schulz S, Rector A, Rodrigues JM, Spackman K. Competing interpretations of disorder codes in SNOMED CT and ICD. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2012; 2012: 819-27.
- 113 Rector AL. Defaults, Context, and Knowledge: Alternatives for OWL-Indexed Knowledge Bases. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 2004; 226-37.
- 114 Hoehndorf R, Loebe F, Kelso J, Herre H. Representing default knowledge in biomedical ontologies: application to the integration of anatomy and phenotype ontologies. BMC Bioinformatics 2007; 8: 377.
- 115 Rector AL, Stevens R, Drummond N. What Causes Pneumonia? The Case for a Standard Semantics for “may” in OWL. OWLED: OWL — Experiences and Directions, 26-27. October 2008. Karlsruhe; 2008
- 116 Schulz S, Cornet R, Spackman K. Consolidating SNOMED CT's ontological commitment. Applied ontology 2011; 6: 1-11.
- 117 Jansen L. On Ascribing Dispositions. In: Kistler M, Gnassounou B. editors. Dispositions and Causal Powers. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2007. p. 161-77.
- 118 Hastings J, Steinbeck C, Jansen L, Schulz J. Substance concentrations as conditions for the realization of dispositions. CEUR Workshop Proceedings: KR-MED 2010-Semantic Applications in Life Sciences. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Formal Biomedical Knowledge Representation, hosted by Bio-Ontologies, 2010. July 9-10 Boston, MA, USA: 2010
- 119 Guarino N. Avoiding IS-A Overloading: The Role of Identity Conditions in Ontology Design. International Conference on Spatial Information Theory: Cognitive and Computational Foundations of Geographic Information Science, Proceedings. 1999 p. 221-34.
- 120 Welty C, Guarino N. Supporting ontological analysis of taxonomic relationships. Data Knowl Eng 2001; 39 (1) 51-74.
- 121 Reiter R. A logic for default reasoning. Artif Intell 1980; 13: 81-132.
- 122 Minsky M. A Framework for Representing Knowledge. MIT-AI Laboratory Memo 306. June 1974 http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html
- 123 Kifer M, Lausen G. F-logic: a higher-order language for reasoning about objects, inheritance, and scheme. ACM SIGMOD Record 1989; 2: 134-46.
- 124 Koller D, Levy A, Pfeffer A. P-classic: A tractable probabilistic description logic. Proceedings of AAAI 1997; p. 390-97.
- 125 Klinov P. Pronto: A Non-monotonic Probabilistic Description Logic Reasoner. Proc. of the European Semantic Web Conference, 6, 2008. Heidelberg: Springer; 2008. p. 822-6.
- 126 Quillian MR. Word concepts: A theory and simulation of some basic semantic capabilities. Syst Res 1967; 12: 410-30.
- 127 Lindberg C. The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) of the National Library of Medicine. J Am Med Rec Assoc 1990; May 61 (5) 40-42.
- 128 Pauker SG, Gorry GA, Kassirer JP, Schwartz WB. Towards the simulation of clinical cognition. Taking a present illness by computer. Am J Med 1976; Jun 60 (7) 981-96.
- 129 Nardon FB, Moura LA. Knowledge sharing and information integration in healthcare using ontologies and deductive databases. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004; 107 (Pt 1) 62-6.
- 130 Racoceanu D, Lacoste C, Teodorescu R, Vuillemenot N. A Semantic Fusion Approach Between Medical Images and Reports Using UMLS. 3rd Asia Information Retrieval Symposium. 2006 p. 460-75.
- 131 Munn K, Smith B. editors. Applied Ontology. An Introduction. Frankfurt am Main: Ontos; 2008
- 132 Cimino JJ. Desiderata for controlled medical vocabularies in the twenty-first century. Methods Inf Med 1998; Nov 37 (4-5) 394-403.
- 133 Jansen J, Schulz S. The Ten Commandments of Ontological Engineering. Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop of Ontologies in Biomedicine and Life Sciences (OBML). Berlin: 06.-07.10 2011. www.onto-med.de/obml/ws2011/obml-2011report.pdf
- 134 Schober D, Smith B, Lewis SE, Kusnierczyk W, Lomax J, Mungall C. et al. Survey-based naming conventions for use in OBO Foundry ontology development. BMC Bioinformatics 2009; Apr 27 10: 125.
- 135 Welty CA. Are Upper-Level Ontologies Worth the Effort? Proceedings of the Eights International Conference on Principles and Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR-02). 2002 p. 632.
- 136 Schulz S, Spackman K, James A, Cocos C, Boeker M. Scalable representations of diseases in biomedical ontologies. Journal of Biomedical Semantics 2011; May 17 2 Suppl 2 S6.
- 137 Bodenreider O, Smith B, Burgun A. The Ontology-Epistemology Divide: A Case Study in Medical Terminology. Proceedings of FOIS 2004. Amsterdam: IOS; 2004
- 138 Ingenerf J, Linder R. Assessing applicability of ontological principles to different types of biomedical vocabularies. Methods Inf Med 2009; 48: 459-67.
- 139 Cheetham E. et al. Using SNOMED CT in HL7 ersion 3; Implementation Guide, Release 1.5. 2009 http://www.ihtsdo.org/fileadmin/user_upload/doc/tig/hl7/hl7_terminfo.html
- 140 Garde S, Knaup P, Hovenga E, Heard S. Towards semantic interoperability for electronic health records. Methods Inf Med 2007; 46 (3) 332-43.
- 141 The National Center for Biomedical Ontology Protégé. http://protege.stanford.edu/
- 142 Rector A, Drummond N, Horridge M, Rogers J, Knublauch H, Stevens R. et al. OWL Pizzas: Practical Experience of Teaching OWL-DL: Common Errors & Common Patterns. In: Motta E, Shadbolt N, Stutt A, Gibbins N. editors. Engineering Knowledge in the Age of the Semantic Web. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin/ Heidelberg: Springer; 2004. p. 63-81.
- 143 Schulz S, Seddig-Raufie D, Grewe N, Röhl J, Schober D, Boeker M, Jansen L. Guideline on Developing Good Ontologies in the Biomedical Domain with Description Logics. 2012 http://purl.org/goodod/guideline
- 144 Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB. Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. Second edition. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2003
- 145 Kitchenham BA, Dybâ T, Jorgensen M. Evidence-Based Software Engineering. ICSE, 04 Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Software Engineering. 2004 p. 273-81.
- 146 Boeker M, Jansen J, Grewe N, Röhl J, Schober D, Seddig-Raufie D, Schulz S. Effects of Guideline-Based Training on the Quality of Formal Ontologies: A Randomized Controlled Trial. PLOS ONE. Accepted for publication 2013
- 147 Gruninger M, Fox MS. The role of competency questions in enterprise engineering. In: Proceedings of the IFIP WG5. 1994 7. 212. http://www.eil.utoronto.ca/enterprise-modelling/papers/benchIFIP94.pdf
- 148 Hoehndorf R, Dumontier M, Gkoutos GV. Evaluation of research in biomedical ontologies. Brief Bioinform. 2012 Sep 8.