Background and Study Aim Cortical screws were proposed as an alternative to the traditional pedicle screws. Diverse experimental results support the biomechanical superiority of cortical screws compared to pedicle screws. Laminectomy is often part of multilevel lumbar surgeries. Laminectomy might weaken the medial bony edge at the entry of the divergently oriented screw and, thereby, the screw purchase. This study investigated the biomechanical strength of lumbar cortical screw after laminectomy.
Objective To compare the fixation strength of cortical screws and traditional pedicle screws after lumbar laminectomy.
Material and Methods A total of 120 pedicles from 60 lumbar vertebrae of 12 cadavers (8 men, 4 women) were assessed. The mean age of the cadavers was 73.4 ± 6.2 years (range: 62–82 years). Using a posterior midline approach, we inserted the traditional pedicle screws into one and the cortical screws into the other side of each vertebra. Laminectomy was performed after screw insertion. Vertical pullout strength and toggle strength testing were performed to compare the fixation strength between the two sides.
Results After laminectomy, the pullout strength of the cortical screws was 718.92 ± 340.76 N, and that of the pedicle screws was 625.78 ± 287.10 N (p = 0.183). The toggle strength of the cortical screws was 544.83 ± 329.97 N; that of the pedicle screws was 613.17 ± 311.70 N (p = 0.145). No significant difference was found in biomechanical strength between the two types of screws.
Conclusion Despite laminectomy, lumbar cortical screws offers comparable pullout and toggle biomechanical strength as traditional pedicle screws.
2
Matsukawa K,
Taguchi E,
Yato Y.
, et al. Evaluation of the fixation strength of pedicle screws using cortical bone trajectory: what is the ideal trajectory for optimal fixation?. Spine 2015; 40 (15) E873-E878
3
Matsukawa K,
Yato Y,
Kato T,
Imabayashi H,
Asazuma T,
Nemoto K.
In vivo analysis of insertional torque during pedicle screwing using cortical bone trajectory technique. Spine 2014; 39 (04) E240-E245
4
Matsukawa K,
Yato Y,
Nemoto O,
Imabayashi H,
Asazuma T,
Nemoto K.
Morphometric measurement of cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screw insertion using computed tomography. J Spinal Disord Tech 2013; 26 (06) E248-E253
8
Kojima K,
Asamoto S,
Kobayashi Y,
Ishikawa M,
Fukui Y.
Cortical bone trajectory and traditional trajectory—a radiological evaluation of screw-bone contact. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2015; 157 (07) 1173-1178
10
Glennie RA,
Dea N,
Kwon BK,
Street JT.
Early clinical results with cortically based pedicle screw trajectory for fusion of the degenerative lumbar spine. J Clin Neurosci 2015; 22 (06) 972-975
13
Cheng WK,
İnceoğlu S.
Cortical and standard trajectory pedicle screw fixation techniques in stabilizing multisegment lumbar spine with low grade spondylolisthesis. Int J Spine Surg 2015; 9: 46
14
Patel SS,
Cheng WK,
Danisa OA.
Early complications after instrumentation of the lumbar spine using cortical bone trajectory technique. J Clin Neurosci 2016; 24: 63-67
15
Akpolat YT,
İnceoğlu S,
Kinne N,
Hunt D,
Cheng WK.
Fatigue performance of cortical bone trajectory screw compared with standard trajectory pedicle screw. Spine 2016; 41 (06) E335-E341
