Future Perspectives in the Management of Nerve Injuries

Abstract

Aim The author presents a solicited “white paper” outlining her perspective on the role of nerve transfers in the management of nerve injuries.

Methods PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were evaluated to compare nerve graft and nerve transfer. An evaluation of the scientific literature by review of index articles was also performed to compare the number of overall clinical publications of nerve repair, nerve graft, and nerve transfer. Finally, a survey regarding the prevalence of nerve transfer surgery was administrated to the World Society of Reconstructive Microsurgery (WSRM) results.

Results Both nerve graft and transfer can generate functional results and the relative success of graft versus transfer depended on the function to be restored and the specific transfers used. Beginning in the early 1990s, there has been a rapid increase from baseline of nerve transfer publications such that clinical nerve transfer publication now exceeds those of nerve repair or nerve graft. Sixty-two responses were received from WSRM membership. These surgeons reported their frequency of “usually or always using nerve transfers for repairing brachial plexus injuries as 68%, radial nerves as 27%, median as 25%, and ulnar as 33%. They reported using nerve transfers” sometimes for brachial plexus 18%, radial nerve 30%, median nerve 34%, ulnar nerve 35%.

Conclusion Taken together this evidence suggests that nerve transfers do offer an alternative technique along with tendon transfers, nerve repair, and nerve grafts.

Keywords

nerve graft - nerve transfer - brachial plexus injury

• References

• 1 Poppler LH, Ee X, Schellhardt L. , et al. Axonal growth arrests after an increased accumulation of Schwann cells expressing senescence markers and stromal cells in acellular nerve allografts. Tissue Eng Part A 2016; 22 (13–14): 949-961
• 2 Saheb-Al-Zamani M, Yan Y, Farber SJ. , et al. Limited regeneration in long acellular nerve allografts is associated with increased Schwann cell senescence. Exp Neurol 2013; 247: 165-177
• 3 Thomas K. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. London:: The University of Chicago Press;; 1962
• 4 Ali ZS, Heuer GG, Faught RW. , et al. Upper brachial plexus injury in adults: comparative effectiveness of different repair techniques. J Neurosurg 2015; 122 (01) 195-201
• 5 Yang LJ, Chang KW, Chung KC. A systematic review of nerve transfer and nerve repair for the treatment of adult upper brachial plexus injury. Neurosurgery 2012; 71 (02) 417-429 , discussion 429
• 6 Garg R, Merrell GA, Hillstrom HJ, Wolfe SW. Comparison of nerve transfers and nerve grafting for traumatic upper plexus palsy: a systematic review and analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93 (09) 819-829
• 7 Koshy JC, Agrawal NA, Seruya M. Nerve transfer versus interpositional nerve graft reconstruction for post-traumatic, isolated axillary nerve injuries: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (05) 953-960
• 8 Socolovsky M, Martins RS, Di Masi G, Siqueira M. Upper brachial plexus injuries: grafts vs ulnar fascicle transfer to restore biceps muscle function. Neurosurgery 2012; 71 (2, Suppl Operative): ons227-ons232
• 9 Bhandari PS, Deb P. Management of isolated musculocutaneous injury: comparing double fascicular nerve transfer with conventional nerve grafting. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (10) 2003-2006
• 10 Wolfe SW, Johnsen PH, Lee SK, Feinberg JH. Long-nerve grafts and nerve transfers demonstrate comparable outcomes for axillary nerve injuries. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39 (07) 1351-1357
• 11 Baltzer HL, Kircher MF, Spinner RJ, Bishop AT, Shin AY. A comparison of outcomes of triceps motor branch-to-axillary nerve transfer or sural nerve interpositional grafting for isolated axillary nerve injury. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (02) 256e-264e
• 12 Malessy MJ, de Ruiter GC, de Boer KS, Thomeer RT. Evaluation of suprascapular nerve neurotization after nerve graft or transfer in the treatment of brachial plexus traction lesions. J Neurosurg 2004; 101 (03) 377-389
• 13 Flores LP. Comparative study of nerve grafting versus distal nerve transfer for treatment of proximal injuries of the ulnar nerve. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31 (09) 647-653
• 14 Baltzer H, Woo A, Oh C, Moran SL. Comparison of ulnar intrinsic function following supercharge end-to-side anterior interosseous-to-ulnar motor nerve transfer: a matched cohort study of proximal ulnar nerve injury patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (06) 1264-1272
• 15 Sallam AA, El-Deeb MS, Imam MA. Nerve transfer versus nerve graft for reconstruction of high ulnar nerve injuries. J Hand Surg Am 2017; 42 (04) 265-273
• 16 Hu CH, Chang TN, Lu JC, Laurence VG, Chuang DC. Comparison of surgical strategies between proximal nerve graft and/or nerve transfer and distal nerve transfer based on functional restoration of elbow flexion: a retrospective review of 147 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (01) 68e-79e