Giving Patients Choice and Control: Health Informatics on the Patient Journey

Summary

Objectives

In modern society, people expect to be actively informed and engaged in decisions about their own health care. Developments in health informatics for patients are increasingly enabling digital solutions to supporting a culture of shared decision making between patients and clinicians. In England, the national patient portal NHS Choices has pioneered patient access to information, with the objectives of achieving significant volumes of use and delivering measurable benefits for patients and the healthcare system.

Methods

Opportunities for patients to use online information and transactions exist along the patient pathway, utilising a variety of methods including using online symptom checkers to manage minor ailments, choosing health services informed by metrics about the quality of service provided and patient comments, through to care delivered online.

Results

Independent evaluation of NHS Choices has indicated that the website is effective in reducing primary care consultations for minor ailments through providing information on appropriate self care. Further research is demonstrating that the collective voice of patients, expressed through online ratings and comments on care received, has a good correlation with more objective, quantitative measures of provider quality.

Conclusion

NHS Choices has achieved high volumes of public use (15 million visits a month) and positive impacts for patients and the health care system. A new information strategy for health and social care in England published in 2012 sets the way ahead for the future of informatics for patients and the public.

Keywords

Patients - consumer health - choice - shared decision making - patient ratings - self care

• References

• 1 Is online medical advice bad for your health? Which? November. 2010
• 2 Health consumer study: the role of digital in patients’ healthcare actions & decisions Google/OTX December. 2009 www.google.com/think/insights
• 3 The social life of health information Pew Research June. 2009
• 4 Getting patient information right, Which? September. 2010
• 5 Bessiere K, Pressman S, Kiesler S, Kraut R. Effects of internet use on health and depression: a longitudinal study. J Med Internet Res 2010; 12 (01) e6.
• 6 O’Connor AM, Bennett CL, Stacey D, Barry M, Col NF. et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; Jul 8; (03) CD001431
• 7 Coulter A, Collins A. Making shared decision making a reality: no decision about me without me Kings Fund/Foundation for Informed Medical Decision Making. 2011
• 8 Webb TL, Joseph J, Yardley L, Michie S. Using the internet to promote health behaviour change: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res 2010; 12 (01) e4.
• 9 Liberating the NHS: an information revolution. London: Department of Health; 2010
• 10 Department of Health: Liberating the NHS: an information revolution. Summary of consultation responses. London: Department of Health; 2011
• 11 NHS Choices. http://www.nhs.uk
• 12 Health consumer study: the role of digital in patients’ healthcare actions & decisions Google/OTX December. 2009 http://www.google.com/think/insights
• 13 Information Standard. http://www.theinformationstandard. org
• 14 Information Prescriptions. http://www.nhs.uk/planners/yourhealth/pages/information.aspx
• 15 Murray J, Majeed A, Khan MS, Lee JT, Nelson P. Use of NHS Choices website for primary care consultations. JRSM Short Rep 2011; 02 (07) 56.
• 16 Workforce adults with minor ills overwhelming NHS The Times. March 16 2010.
• 17 Boyce T, Dixon A, Fasolo B, Reutskaja E. Choosing a high quality hospital: the role of nudges, scorecard design and information. London: King’s Fund; 2010
• 18 Patient Opinion. http://www.patientopinion.org.uk
• 19 iWantGreatCare. http://www.iwantgreatcare.org
• 20 Greaves F, Pape UJ, King D, Darzi A, Majeed A, Wachter RM. et al. Associations between web-based patient ratings and objective measures of hospital quality. Arch Intern Med 2012; 172 (05) 435-6.
• 21 Gao GG, McCullough JS, Agarwal R, Jha AK. The changing landscape of physician quality reporting: analysis of patients’ online ratings of their physicians over a 5-year period. J Med Internet Res 2012; 14 (01) e38.
• 22 Remote control: the patient practitioner relationship in the digital age NHS Confederation. 2011
• 23 Pyper C, Amery J, Watson M, Crook C. Patients’ experiences when accessing their online patient records in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2004; 54 (498) 38-43.
• 24 The power of information: putting us in control of the health and care information we need. London: Department of Health; 2010