Findings from 2017 on Consumer Health Informatics and Education: Health Data Access and Sharing

Summary

Objective: To summarize the state of the art during the year 2017 in consumer health informatics and education, with a special emphasis on sharing health data and accessing personal health information (PHI) from patients' and consumers' perspective.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search of articles published in PubMed using a predefined set of queries which identified 228 potential articles for review. The section editors then screened these articles according to topic relevance and selected 15 candidate best papers for full review and scoring by a panel of international experts. Based on the scores and the reviews, four papers received the highest score and were selected in a consensus meeting as the best papers on health data access and sharing from consumers' and patients' perspective.

Results: These four papers were categorised into the following topics: 1) data sharing for research and governance in privacy protection; 2) use of personal health information and individual privacy concerns; and 3) consumers' views and demographic characteristics regarding health data sharing and the use of digital health portals. Overall, it was surprising to see only a small number of papers reporting original research in this area.

Conclusions: Patients understand the need for sharing information to facilitate best care and to enrich biomedical knowledge. When confronted with the reality of accessing information systems for their own information, patients are concerned about usability as well as privacy. Overall, there is a need for more emphasis on: 1) considering privacy as a feature defined by design; 2) using specific consent approaches and data sharing mechanisms for recruiting clinical trial participants; 3) taking into account socio-demographic characteristics when promoting consumer access to personal health information; and 4) defining indicators of high-quality care to incorporate healthcare professionals' level of caution when accessing patients' medical information and fostering patient trust in data exchange. Ultimately, privacy mechanisms should be part of the design process and not only be implemented when security has been breached and violated.

Keywords

Consumer health informatics - health data sharing - personal health information - privacy by design - online access to health records

• References

• 1 Denecke K, Bamidis P, Bond C, Gabarron E, Househ M, Lau AYS. , et al. Ethical Issues of Social Media Usage in Healthcare. Yearb Med Inform 2015; 10: 137-47
• 2 Landau S. What Went Wrong? Facebook and ‘Sharing’ Data with Cambridge Analytica. March 28, 2018. https://cacm.acm.org/blogs/blog-cacm/226442-what-went-wrong-facebook-and-sharing-data-with-cambridge-analytica/fulltext (last visit: 16.06.2018)
• 3 Bender JL, Cyr AB, Arbuckle L, Ferris LE. Ethics and Privacy Implications of Using the Internet and Social Media to Recruit Participants for Health Research: A Privacy-by-Design Framework for Online Recruitment. J Med Internet Res 2017; Apr 6; 19 (04) e104
• 4 Ohmann C, Banzi R, Canham S, Battaglia S, Matei M, Ariyo C. , et al. Sharing and reuse of individual participant data from clinical trials: principles and recommendations. BMJ Open 2017; Dec 14; 7 (12) e018647
• 5 Sanderson SC, Brothers KB, Mercaldo ND, Clayton EW, Antommaria AHM, Aufox SA. , et al. Public Attitudes toward Consent and Data Sharing in Biobank Research: A Large Multi-site Experimental Survey in the US. Am J Hum Genet 2017; Mar 2; 100 (03) 414-27
• 6 Abdelhamid M, Gaia J, Sanders GL. Putting the Focus Back on the Patient: How Privacy Concerns Affect Personal Health Information Sharing Intentions. J Med Internet Res 2017; Sep 13; 19 (09) e169
• 7 Entzeridou E, Markopoulou E. Mollaki V Public and physician's expectations and ethical concerns about electronic health record: Benefits outweigh risks except for information security. Int J Med Inform 2018; Feb; 110: 98-107
• 8 Kim KK, Sankar P, Wilson MD, Haynes SC. Factors affecting willingness to share electronic health data among California consumers. BMC Med Ethics 2017; Apr 4; 18 (01) 25
• 9 Lee BS, Oster NV, Chen GY, Ding LL, Walker JD, Elmore JG. Ophthalmology patients’ interest in online access to clinic notes at three US clinics. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2017; Jul; 37 (04) 420-7
• 10 Medford-Davis LN, Chang L. Rhodes KV Health Information Exchange: What do patients want?. Health Informatics J 2017; Dec; 23 (04) 268-78
• 11 Peacock S, Reddy A, Leveille SG, Walker J, Payne TH, Oster NV. , et al. Patient portals and personal health information online: perception, access, and use by US adults. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017; Apr 1; 24 (e1): e173-e177
• 12 Rau HH, Wu YS, Chu CM, Wang FC, Hsu MH, Chang CW. , et al. Importance-Performance Analysis of Personal Health Records in Taiwan: A Web-Based Survey. J Med Internet Res 2017; Apr 27; 19 (04) e131
• 13 Dhir A, Torsheim T, Pallesen S, Andreassen CS. Do Online Privacy Concerns Predict Selfie Behavior among Adolescents, Young Adults and Adults?. Front Psychol 2017; May 23; 8: 815
• 14 Garcia D. Leaking privacy and shadow profiles in online social networks. Sci Adv 2017; Aug 4; 3 (08) e1701172
• 15 Sakaguchi-Tang DK, Bosold AL, Choi YK, Turner AM. Patient Portal Use and Experience Among Older Adults: Systematic Review. JMIR Med Inform 2017; Oct 16; 5 (04) e38
• 16 Trachtenbarg DE, Asche C, Ramsahai S, Duling J, Ren J. The benefits, risks and costs of privacy: patient preferences and willingness to pay. Curr Med Res Opin 2017; May; 33 (05) 845-51
• 17 Walker DM, Johnson T, Ford EW, Huerta TR. Trust Me, I'm a Doctor: Examining Changes in How Privacy Concerns Affect Patient Withholding Behavior. J Med Internet Res 2017; Jan 4; 19 (01) e2