PDF herunterladen
J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34(09): 708-718
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1642619
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Vascularized Bone Grafting for Reconstruction of Oncologic Defects in the Spine: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of the Literature

Rachel Pedreira
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Charalampos Siotos
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Brian H. Cho
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Stella M. Seal
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Deepa Bhat
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Hannah M. Carl
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Michelle Seu
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
J. P. Wolinksy
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Justin M. Sacks
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
› Institutsangaben Funding None.
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

09. Dezember 2017

13. März 2018

Publikationsdatum:
02. Mai 2018 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background Resection of primary spinal tumors requires reconstruction for restoration of spinal column stability. Traditionally, some combination of bone grafting and instrumentation is implemented. However, delayed healing environments are associated with pseudoarthrodesis and failure. Implementation of vascularized bone grafting (VBG) to complement hardware may present a solution. We evaluated the use of VBG in oncologic spinal reconstruction via systematic review and pooled analysis of literature.

Methods We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus for studies published through September 2017 according to the PRISMA guidelines and performed a pooled analysis of studies with n > 5. Additionally, we performed retrospective review of patients at the Johns Hopkins Hospital that received spinal reconstruction with VBG.

Results We identified 21 eligible studies and executed a pooled analysis of 12. Analysis indicated an 89% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75–1.03) rate of successful union when VBG is employed after primary tumor resection. The overall complication rate was 42% (95% CI: 0.23–0.61) and reoperation rate was 27% (95% CI: 0.12–0.41) in the pooled cohort. Wound complication rate was 18% (95% CI: 0.11–0.26). Fifteen out of 209 patients (7.2%) had instrumentation failure and mean time-to-union was 6 months. Consensus in the literature and in the patients reviewed is that introduction of VBG into irradiated or infected tissue beds proves advantageous given decreased resorption, increased load bearing, and faster consolidation. Downsides to this technique included longer operations, donor-site morbidity, and difficulty in coordinating care.

Conclusions Our results demonstrate that complication rates using VBG are similar to those reported in studies using non-VBG for similar spinal reconstructions; however, fusion rates are better. Given rapid fusion and possible hardware independence, VBG may be useful in reconstructing defects in patients with longer life expectancies and/or with a history of chemoradiation and/or infection at the site of tumor resection.

Keywords

vascularized bone grafting - spinal reconstruction - spinal tumor
 

  • References

  • 1 Boriani S, Gasbarrini A, Bandiera S, Ghermandi R, Lador R. Predictors for surgical complications of en bloc resections in the spine: review of 220 cases treated by the same team. Eur Spine J 2016; 25 (12) 3932-3941
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 de Boer HH. The history of bone grafts. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; (226) 292-298
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Fu TS, Wang IC, Lu ML, Hsieh MK, Chen LH, Chen WJ. The fusion rate of demineralized bone matrix compared with autogenous iliac bone graft for long multi-segment posterolateral spinal fusion. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2016; 17 (01) 3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Lewandrowski KU, Hecht AC, DeLaney TF, Chapman PA, Hornicek FJ, Pedlow FX. Anterior spinal arthrodesis with structural cortical allografts and instrumentation for spine tumor surgery. Spine 2004; 29 (10) 1150-1158 , discussion 1159
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Sciubba DM, De la Garza Ramos R, Goodwin CR. , et al. Total en bloc spondylectomy for locally aggressive and primary malignant tumors of the lumbar spine. Spine J 2016; 25 (12) 4080-4087
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Matsumoto M, Watanabe K, Tsuji T. , et al. Late instrumentation failure after total en bloc spondylectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 2011; 15 (03) 320-327
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Muramatsu K, Hashimoto T, Tominaga Y, Taguchi T. Vascularized bone graft for oncological reconstruction of the extremities: review of the biological advantages. Anticancer Res 2014; 34 (06) 2701-2707
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Brown CW, Orme TJ, Richardson HD. The rate of pseudarthrosis (surgical nonunion) in patients who are smokers and patients who are nonsmokers: a comparison study. Spine 1986; 11 (09) 942-943
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Jandali S, Diluna ML, Storm PB, Low DW. Use of the vascularized free fibula graft with an arteriovenous loop for fusion of cervical and thoracic spinal defects in previously irradiated pediatric patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (05) 1932-1938
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Su AW, Habermann EB, Thomsen KM, Milbrandt TA, Nassr A, Larson AN. Risk factors for 30-day unplanned readmission and major perioperative complications after spine fusion surgery in adults: a review of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Spine 2016; 41 (19) 1523-1534
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Clemens MW, Chang EI, Selber JC, Lewis VO, Oates SD, Chang DW. Composite extremity and trunk reconstruction with vascularized fibula flap in postoncologic bone defects: a 10-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (01) 170-178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Hsu RW, Wood MB, Sim FH, Chao EY. Free vascularised fibular grafting for reconstruction after tumour resection. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997; 79 (01) 36-42
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Wilden JA, Moran SL, Dekutoski MB, Bishop AT, Shin AY. Results of vascularized rib grafts in complex spinal reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (04) 832-839
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Lee MJ, Ondra SL, Mindea SA, Fine NA, Dumanian GA. Indications and rationale for use of vascularized fibula bone flaps in cervical spine arthrodeses. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116 (01) 1-7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Yajima H, Tamai S, Mizumoto S, Sugimura M, Horiuchi K. Vascularized fibular graft for reconstruction after resection of aggressive benign and malignant bone tumors. Microsurgery 1992; 13 (05) 227-233
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 2003; 73 (09) 712-716
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Houdek MT, Rose PS, Bakri K. , et al. Outcomes and complications of reconstruction with use of free vascularized fibular graft for spinal and pelvic defects following resection of a malignant tumor. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99 (13) e69
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Yanamadala V, Rozman PA, Kumar JI. , et al. Vascularized fibular strut autografts in spinal reconstruction after resection of vertebral chordoma or chondrosarcoma: a retrospective series. Neurosurgery 2017; 81 (01) 156-164
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Ogura K, Sakuraba M, Miyamoto S, Fujiwara T, Chuman H, Kawai A. Pelvic ring reconstruction with a double-barreled free vascularized fibula graft after resection of malignant pelvic bone tumor. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2015; 135 (05) 619-625
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Saksena A, Aho J, Winocour S. , et al. Combination of a fillet flap, free tissue transfer, and autologous tissue grafts in pelvic reconstruction following retroperitoneal sarcoma: a case report. Microsurgery 2015; 35 (04) 320-323
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Vrints I, Depreitere B, Vranckx JJ. Multilevel cervical reconstruction with no remaining hardware: the potential of a vascularised fibular strut graft. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65 (12) e344-e347
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kaltoft B, Kruse A, Jensen LT, Elberg JJ. Reconstruction of the cervical spine with two osteocutaneous fibular flap after radiotherapy and resection of osteoclastoma : a case report. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65 (09) 1262-1264
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Lewis SJ, Kulkarni AG, Rampersaud YR. , et al. Posterior column reconstruction with autologous rib graft after en bloc tumor excision. Spine 2012; 37 (04) 346-350
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Mendel E, Mayerson JL, Nathoo N, Edgar RL, Schmidt C, Miller MJ. Reconstruction of the pelvis and lumbar-pelvic junction using 2 vascularized autologous bone grafts after en bloc resection for an iliosacral chondrosarcoma. J Neurosurg Spine 2011; 15 (02) 168-173
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Sivabalan P, Li J, Mobbs RJ. Extensive lumbar chordoma and unique reconstructive approach. Eur Spine J 2011; 20 (Suppl. 02) S336-S342
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Ackerman DB, Rose PS, Moran SL, Dekutoski MB, Bishop AT, Shin AY. The results of vascularized-free fibular grafts in complex spinal reconstruction. J Spinal Disord Tech 2011; 24 (03) 170-176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Vos CG, Hartemink KJ, Oosterhuis JW, Winters HA, Paul MA. En bloc resection of 3 vertebra in a pancoast patient: long-term stability using a free vascularized fibular graft. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 91 (01) 295-298
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Winters HA, van Engeland AE, Jiya TU, van Royen BJ. The use of free vascularised bone grafts in spinal reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (03) 516-523
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Moran SL, Bakri K, Mardini S, Shin AY, Bishop AT. The use of vascularized fibular grafts for the reconstruction of spinal and sacral defects. Microsurgery 2009; 29 (05) 393-400
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Choudry UH, Moran SL, Karacor Z. Functional reconstruction of the pelvic ring with simultaneous bilateral free fibular flaps following total sacral resection. Ann Plast Surg 2006; 57 (06) 673-676
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Oshima Y, Miyoshi K, Mikami Y, Kawamura N. Pelvic ring reconstruction with a vascularized pedicle iliac bone graft for a large sacral schwannoma. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005; 18 (02) 200-202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Nakamura H, Yamano Y, Seki M, Konishi S. Use of folded vascularized rib graft in anterior fusion after treatment of thoracic and upper lumbar lesions. Technical note. J Neurosurg 2001; 94 (2, Suppl): 323-327
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Wright NM, Kaufman BA, Haughey BH, Lauryssen C. Complex cervical spine neoplastic disease: reconstruction after surgery by using a vascularized fibular strut graft. Case report. J Neurosurg 1999; 90 (1, Suppl): 133-137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Nemoto K, Asazuma T, Amako M, Kawaguchi M, Yamagishi M, Mizuno H. Vascularized fibula graft for spinal fusion in severe cervical kyphosis due to neurofibromatosis. J Reconstr Microsurg 1997; 13 (08) 559-562
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Taylor GI. The current status of free vascularized bone grafts. Clin Plast Surg 1983; 10 (01) 185-209
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Taylor GI, Miller GD, Ham FJ. The free vascularized bone graft. A clinical extension of microvascular techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 1975; 55 (05) 533-544
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Taylor GI, Watson N. One-stage repair of compound leg defects with free, revascularized flaps of groin skin and iliac bone. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978; 61 (04) 494-506
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Métaizeau JP, Czorny A, Miahle C, Kuhnast M, Prévot J. Use of vascularized bone grafts in surgery of the spine. Apropos of 6 cases [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1989; 75 (03) 166-171
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Yajima H, Tamai S, Ono H, Kizaki K. Vascularized bone grafts to the upper extremities. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 101 (03) 727-735 , discussion 736–737
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Lareau CR, Deren ME, Fantry A, Donahue RM, DiGiovanni CW. Does autogenous bone graft work? A logistic regression analysis of data from 159 papers in the foot and ankle literature. Foot Ankle Surg 2015; 21 (03) 150-159
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Moura LB, Carvalho Pde A, Xavier CB. , et al. Autogenous non-vascularized bone graft in segmental mandibular reconstruction: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 45 (11) 1388-1394
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Aydinli U, Akin S, Tirelioglu O, Ozturk C, Yalcinkaya U, Sadikoglu Y. A new autogenous graft choice in pelvic reconstructions: free vascularized rib (a case report). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2006; 126 (01) 57-62
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Aliano KA, Agulnick M, Cohen B. , et al. Spinal reconstruction for osteomyelitis with free vascularized fibular grafts using intra-abdominal recipient vessels: a series of three cases. Microsurgery 2013; 33 (07) 560-566
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Sur YJ, Morsy M, Mohan AT, Zhu L, Lachman N, Saint-Cyr M. The first perforating branch of the deep femoral artery: a reliable recipient vessel for vascularized fibular grafts: an anatomical study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016; 69 (03) 351-358
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Korompilias AV, Paschos NK, Lykissas MG, Kostas-Agnantis I, Vekris MD, Beris AE. Recent updates of surgical techniques and applications of free vascularized fibular graft in extremity and trunk reconstruction. Microsurgery 2011; 31 (03) 171-175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Addosooki AI, Alam-Eldin M, Abdel-Wanis Mel-S, Yousef MAA, Dionigi P, Kenawey MO. Anterior cervical reconstruction using free vascularized fibular graft after cervical corpectomy. Global Spine J 2016; 6 (03) 212-219
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Erdmann D, Meade RA, Lins RE, McCann RL, Richardson WJ, Levin LS. Use of the microvascular free fibula transfer as a salvage reconstruction for failed anterior spine surgery due to chronic osteomyelitis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (07) 2438-2445 , discussion 2446–2447
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Govender S, Kumar KP, Med PC. Long-term follow-up assessment of vascularized rib pedicle graft for tuberculosis kyphosis. J Pediatr Orthop 2018; 21 (03) 281-284
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Eastlack RK, Dekutoski MB, Bishop AT, Moran SL, Shin AY. Vascularized pedicled rib graft: a technique for posterior placement in spinal reconstruction. J Spinal Disord Tech 2007; 20 (08) 610-615
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Garvey PB, Clemens MW, Rhines LD, Sacks JM. Vertical rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flow-through flap to a free fibula flap for total sacrectomy reconstruction. Microsurgery 2013; 33 (01) 32-38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Shin AY, Dekutoski MB. The role of vascularized bone grafts in spine surgery. Orthop Clin North Am 2007; 38 (01) 61-72 , vi
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Mesfin A, Sciubba DM, Dea N. , et al. Changing the adverse event profile in metastatic spine surgery: an evidence-based approach to target wound complications and instrumentation failure. Spine 2016; 41 (Suppl. 20) S262-S270
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Shaffer JW, Davy DT, Field GA, Bensusan JS, Kellis GJ. The superiority of vascularized compared to nonvascularized rib grafts in spine surgery shown by biological and physical methods. Spine 1988; 13 (10) 1150-1154
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Shpitzer T, Neligan P, Boyd B, Gullane P, Gur E, Freeman J. Leg morbidity and function following fibular free flap harvest. Ann Plast Surg 1997; 38 (05) 460-464
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Feuvrier D, Sagawa Jr Y, Béliard S, Pauchot J, Decavel P. Long-term donor-site morbidity after vascularized free fibula flap harvesting: clinical and gait analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016; 69 (02) 262-269
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Ling XF, Peng X. What is the price to pay for a free fibula flap? A systematic review of donor-site morbidity following free fibula flap surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (03) 657-674
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Momoh AO, Yu P, Skoracki RJ, Liu S, Feng L, Hanasono MM. A prospective cohort study of fibula free flap donor-site morbidity in 157 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (03) 714-720
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Peng YP, Lahiri A. Spare-part surgery. Semin Plast Surg 2013; 27 (04) 190-197
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar