Comparison of Mortality and 30-Day Complication Rates for Patients Undergoing Fixation versus Revision Arthroplasty after Periprosthetic Fractures of the Hip and Knee

Shalen Kouk; Benjamin S. Kester; Omar A. Behery; Jonathan M. Vigdorchik; Ran Schwarzkopf

doi:10.1055/s-0038-1646935

The Journal of Hip Surgery, Table of Contents

The Journal of Hip Surgery 2018; 02(01): 009-014
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1646935

Special Section Article

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Comparison of Mortality and 30-Day Complication Rates for Patients Undergoing Fixation versus Revision Arthroplasty after Periprosthetic Fractures of the Hip and Knee

Shalen Kouk

¹Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, New York

,

Benjamin S. Kester

¹Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, New York

,

Omar A. Behery

¹Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, New York

,

Jonathan M. Vigdorchik

¹Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, New York

,

Ran Schwarzkopf

¹Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, New York

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Periprosthetic fractures of the hip and knee are often associated with significant morbidity and mortality and may require operative fixation or revision arthroplasty to restore ambulation and functional status. There is scarce literature comparing patient profiles and operative complications between periprosthetic fractures of the hip/knee and the predisposing risk factors. The main study goal is to compare the postoperative complication rates and mortality between operative osteosynthesis fixation and revision arthroplasty while also evaluating the patient characteristics, intraoperative factors, and 30-day postoperative complications of periprosthetic total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) fractures, as well as patient-related risk factors for serious adverse events. Patients who underwent surgery for periprosthetic fractures around a THA/TKA prosthesis were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database between 2008 and 2015. Preoperative patient demographics and comorbidities, as well as operative factors and 30-day postoperative complications were compared between periprosthetic factures of the hip and those of the knee. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify patient risk factors for adverse events. Of 1,171 identified patients, patients with THA and TKA periprosthetic fractures had similar characteristics and were more likely female, with age over 70 years and a body mass index of > 25. Both groups had similar 30-day complication rates, with 9.8% of hip patients and 11.2% of knee patients having a postoperative complication. Mortality rate for THA periprosthetic fracture status postrevision or fixation was 3.6% and 3.3% for those with TKA periprosthetic fractures. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality or postoperative complication rates in periprosthetic fractures treated with operative osteosynthesis fixation versus revision arthroplasty for THA and TKA. Patients with periprosthetic hip and knee arthroplasty fractures can be effectively managed with either operative osteosynthesis fixation or revision arthroplasty when properly indicated, with no significant difference in mortality, complication, or reoperation rates.

Keywords

Hip - knee - complications - risk factors - periprosthetic fractures

Full Text

References

References
1 Ruder JA, Hart GP, Kneisl JS, Springer BD, Karunakar MA. Predictors of functional recovery following periprosthetic distal femur fractures. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (05) 1571-1575
2 Drew JM, Griffin WL, Odum SM, Van Doren B, Weston BT, Stryker LS. Survivorship after periprosthetic femur fracture: factors affecting outcome. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (06) 1283-1288
3 Ristevski B, Nauth A, Williams DS. , et al. Systematic review of the treatment of periprosthetic distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2014; 28 (05) 307-312
4 Griffiths EJ, Cash DJ, Kalra S, Hopgood PJ. Time to surgery and 30-day morbidity and mortality of periprosthetic hip fractures. Injury 2013; 44 (12) 1949-1952
5 Bhattacharyya T, Chang D, Meigs JB, Estok II DM, Malchau H. Mortality after periprosthetic fracture of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (12) 2658-2662
6 Matharu GS, Pynsent PB, Dunlop DJ, Revell MP. Clinical outcome following surgical intervention for periprosthetic hip fractures at a tertiary referral centre. Hip Int 2012; 22 (05) 494-499
7 Streubel PN. Mortality after periprosthetic femur fractures. J Knee Surg 2013; 26 (01) 27-30
8 Holder N, Papp S, Gofton W, Beaulé PE. Outcomes following surgical treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures: a single centre series. Can J Surg 2014; 57 (03) 209-213
9 Kester BS, Merkow RP, Ju MH. , et al. Effect of post-discharge venous thromboembolism on hospital quality comparisons following hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96 (17) 1476-1484
10 Hall BL, Hamilton BH, Richards K, Bilimoria KY, Cohen ME, Ko CY. Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals. Ann Surg 2009; 250 (03) 363-376
11 Shiloach M, Frencher Jr SK, Steeger JE. , et al. Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 210 (01) 6-16
12 Khuri SF, Henderson WG, Daley J. , et al; Principal Site Investigators of the Patient Safety in Surgery Study. The patient safety in surgery study: background, study design, and patient populations. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 204 (06) 1089-1102